Login

russian armor

M5 Quadrush

PAGES (16)down
22 Jul 2015, 17:19 PM
#61
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600


Keep in mind that it costs 120 Munitions to get that upgrade. Increasing the fuel cost is pushing back the Soviet ability to reinforce on the field. Quite dangerous for those who use Conscripts and Penals (No call in infantry).

Of course, there's also another possibility we can pursue. What if we moved it's suppression buff to Vet 3 rather than have it from the start? :)


Soviets generally are not as ammo demanding as other factions (since cons dont have a weapon upgrade). and a sov player will have around 220 ammo by the 6:30 marker if they own half the map.
Alot of people skipped T3 totally before the last patch, so im not sure it would be a massive issue to have to pay an extra 15 fuel for the M5. But might make a player take more care of it than yolo it in with a quad cannon. Because 2-3 squad wipes is worth it ect.


I dont mid your last suggestion either, but its unlikely Ostheer will have a shrek upgrade anyway by 6:30 if hes upgraded LMG's. The "force retreat" factor will still be there :/
22 Jul 2015, 17:47 PM
#62
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

The quad upgrade should just require T4.


I support this idea :foreveralone:

22 Jul 2015, 17:49 PM
#63
avatar of Chocoboknight88

Posts: 393

I would considering increasing fuel an issue. Definitely. There's no guarantee that the Soviets can hold onto half the map for long enough. Not to mention that the Ostheer have multiple, cheap ways of reinforcing like Fuel-less Bunkers (Cost munition but still...), cheap half tracks and that rare Repair HQ. For far superior infantry no less. Hardly fair, is it? While I do recognize the early Quad is a problem, I feel the cheap half track's ability to reinforce is crucial for keeping the Soviet's in the game if things don't go their way early on.

This is why I cannot support a fuel cost increase for the half track. Let's focus on changes that tackle the quad directly.
22 Jul 2015, 17:59 PM
#64
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

I would considering increasing fuel an issue. Definitely. There's no guarantee that the Soviets can hold onto half the map for long enough. Not to mention that the Ostheer have multiple, cheap ways of reinforcing like Fuel-less Bunkers (Cost munition but still...), cheap half tracks and that rare Repair HQ. For far superior infantry no less. Hardly fair, is it? While I do recognize the early Quad is a problem, I feel the cheap half track's ability to reinforce is crucial for keeping the Soviet's in the game if things don't go their way early on.

This is why I cannot support a fuel cost increase for the half track. Let's focus on changes that tackle the quad directly.


Fuel increase worked for the flacktrak
22 Jul 2015, 18:01 PM
#65
avatar of Chocoboknight88

Posts: 393

Flak Tracks don't reinforce nor do they need an upgrade... -_-'
22 Jul 2015, 18:02 PM
#66
avatar of Corsin

Posts: 600

Flak Tracks don't reinforce nor do they need an upgrade... -_-'


M5 doesnt have a setup time :P
22 Jul 2015, 18:10 PM
#67
avatar of Chocoboknight88

Posts: 393

Probably wasn't designed to in real life. Perhaps the M5 was heavy enough in real life to not require being anchored down compared to it's German cousin? Not an expert on the technicals but...

Real world debate aside, it's still doesn't justify the fuel cost increase in my eyes. It's only a problem when upgraded and that's what should be tackled without affecting the non upgraded version.
22 Jul 2015, 18:11 PM
#68
avatar of korgoth

Posts: 170

The quad upgrade should just require T4.

Want to do a reinforcement push? Get an early M5.
Want to do early harrasment? Invest in the more expensive T70 (which is still a fine vehicle, just now completely outclassed by the M5 quad).

Quad upgrade at T4 will make the M5 stay relevent in the lategame, because unlike the FlamerHT it has long range, supression, and helpt to deal with loitering planes.



I like this one!
22 Jul 2015, 18:12 PM
#69
avatar of Chocoboknight88

Posts: 393

Indeed! That's a suggestion I like too. :)
22 Jul 2015, 18:12 PM
#70
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

Relic, just swap Soviet and American half tracks Kappa
22 Jul 2015, 18:19 PM
#71
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

@Relic

pls make Quad upgrade require T4
22 Jul 2015, 19:24 PM
#72
avatar of ATCF
Donator 33

Posts: 587

Plz remove suppression from M5 quads since it ruins their awesome DPS, without suppression you could kill enemy soldiers in seconds, but that damn suppression ruins everything!
22 Jul 2015, 19:41 PM
#73
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 17:10 PMCorsin


At least the T-70's fuel cost reflects its impact, the M5 is way too cheap atm.

Because you're not factoring in 120mun.
Thats resource too, which bumps the cost.
22 Jul 2015, 19:46 PM
#74
avatar of Lumpy
Patrion 27

Posts: 78

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 19:41 PMKatitof

Because you're not factoring in 120mun.
Thats resource too, which bumps the cost.

except the soviets float munitions like no other :foreveralone:
22 Jul 2015, 19:52 PM
#75
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 19:46 PMLumpy

except the soviets float munitions like no other :foreveralone:

Soviets would love to spend that muni on infantry and vehicle upgrades and on effective grenades, believe me, they would love to.

Just a tiiiiiiiny wiiiiiiiiny detail prevents them :foreveralone:
22 Jul 2015, 20:00 PM
#76
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

I rushed an M5 into the enemies base yesterday and killed his Stuka lol. Yeah something needs to be fixed with it's damage.
22 Jul 2015, 20:03 PM
#77
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post22 Jul 2015, 19:46 PMLumpy

except the soviets float munitions like no other :foreveralone:


Lel soviet must use ammo for many things to be in game.
22 Jul 2015, 20:06 PM
#78
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 830

I rushed an M5 into the enemies base yesterday and killed his Stuka lol. Yeah something needs to be fixed with it's damage.


Haha I did this as well, not only killed a stuka, killed a squad as well :megusta:

I love the thing, it is way to good xd
22 Jul 2015, 20:06 PM
#79
avatar of G4bb4_G4nd4lf
Donator 33

Posts: 658

I honestly think ambush camo might be really useful this patch.

Just camo a gren squad and ambush faust those early light vehicles.

Does the damage buff apply to Pzfausts as well?
22 Jul 2015, 20:07 PM
#80
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 830

I honestly think ambush camo might be really useful this patch.

Just camo a gren squad and ambush faust those early light vehicles.

Does the damage buff apply to Pzfausts as well?


Yeah untill they uncloack and get rekt before you can even blink.
PAGES (16)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

844 users are online: 844 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49070
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM