It's almost like people think all units should have penalty for building while under fire.
No just cons
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
It's almost like people think all units should have penalty for building while under fire.
Posts: 258
Posts: 345
Posts: 2779
Asymmetrical balance
Posts: 2779
Yes Cons sandbags are annoying as hell but they really need them to survive.
But it's kind of ridiculous that it feels like they don't take any additional damage while building.
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1740
And do Guards need them to survive? Airborne need them to survive?
Posts: 440
Posts: 1355
Posts: 1653
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Sandbags are annoying, but without them Soviets have nothing. I think they're extremely annoying when Guards are defending the sandbags. Modelsniping whoop whoop Kappa Kappa MVGame
Posts: 692
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
And do Guards need them to survive?
Those sandbag can be used by them and it is ridiculous stupid. I start hate playing 1v1 because of this. Cons getting some vital point with sandbag and you need at least 3 times manpower based unit to flush it out. Very fun indeed.
Posts: 1653
I see someone have met Lenny in matchmaking
That would require using something that isn't blob a-move and blob a-move is integral part of axis players playstyle, mentality and culture.
Posts: 2779
Combined arms
Posts: 1653
By your excellent logic, Ober and Volks blobs are combined arms.
Posts: 1108
next thread about conscripts is probably gonna be "Flare traps are owerpowered". Kappa
Posts: 1653
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
By your excellent logic, Ober and Volks blobs are combined arms.
Posts: 2779
Well, they are.
Be happy sandbags don't walk around with guards, shooting rockets at your tanks.
14 | |||||
168 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |