The first thing infantry do when occupying a position, no matter how temporary, is to begin constructing covered positions.
And fuck, cover is a good asset against blobbers.
But yeah the Soviet sandbags have problems
Sandbags Sandbags Everywhere
15 Jul 2015, 04:14 AM
#21
Posts: 395
I bought vCoH on January 3rd, 2007.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
15 Jul 2015, 04:34 AM
#22
Posts: 760
I've been saying con's needed a late game buff for since march deployment, but every kept crying about con's getting green cover and soviet call in infantry like that magically made con's useful pass the 12 minute mark
15 Jul 2015, 05:01 AM
#23
Posts: 1930
as annoying as the sandbags are, they are one of the few things that keep the conscript useful into late game. placing
15 Jul 2015, 05:22 AM
#24
4 
Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
I agree, sandbags need some changes. With just conscripts, its not so bad, but the problem comes with the synergies that you get with guards.
Unfortunately, after the nerf to molotovs, conscripts have almost no role in the lategame except as sandbag/ AT nade dispensers. I'm all for scaling down conscript sandbags, but I feel like it would need to come with a buff to conscript scaling, like a T4 upgrade for 3-4 PPS43s, which could work like weaker STGs.
Unfortunately, after the nerf to molotovs, conscripts have almost no role in the lategame except as sandbag/ AT nade dispensers. I'm all for scaling down conscript sandbags, but I feel like it would need to come with a buff to conscript scaling, like a T4 upgrade for 3-4 PPS43s, which could work like weaker STGs.
15 Jul 2015, 05:36 AM
#25
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I feel like just making it so building sandbags while being shot at gave you 25% more received damage would be enough.
15 Jul 2015, 05:54 AM
#26
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I feel like just making it so building sandbags while being shot at gave you 25% more received damage would be enough.
More like make all buildable objetcs give 25% more RA while constructing them.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
15 Jul 2015, 05:56 AM
#27
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
I don't think the soviet sandbags or better said barricades are OP except maybe against OKW and that's because of 1. volks shitty anti infantry capabilities, because of 2. you think twice before throwing a grenade (shouldn't I invest it to buy a shreck than try to flush these cons out of green cover? Decisions decisions...) because of 3. you don't have a flamethrower, because of 4. you don't have a proper mortar, 5. because you don't have a sniper and so on...... The only thing to do against this tactic is start with T3 and build an AA HT which willl be hardcountered pretty fast if your soviet opponent started with T2 or use that super-OP tank hunters doctrine. Or you can rely on more sturmpios, get close and be fast while doing it.
So OKW has some solutions too, in the end.
So OKW has some solutions too, in the end.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
15 Jul 2015, 06:02 AM
#28
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
dank hunters and sandbags equals pure Kappa
 |
Playercard of Dusty |
|||||||||||||||
|
Devils_Brigade: man captain molo why dont you just buy and m3 drive that around instead of playing coh
15 Jul 2015, 06:29 AM
#29
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
Does anyone know if the okw irht can crush sandbags? I feel like it would be a good troll counter to script sandbag spam.
15 Jul 2015, 06:34 AM
#30
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Does anyone know if the okw irht can crush sandbags? I feel like it would be a good troll counter to script sandbag spam.
It can crush OKW sandbags, but not conscript ones.
15 Jul 2015, 06:38 AM
#31
Posts: 1891
I don't think the soviet sandbags or better said barricades are OP except maybe against OKW and that's because of 1. volks shitty anti infantry capabilities, because of 2. you think twice before throwing a grenade (shouldn't I invest it to buy a shreck than try to flush these cons out of green cover? Decisions decisions...) because of 3. you don't have a flamethrower, because of 4. you don't have a proper mortar, 5. because you don't have a sniper and so on...... The only thing to do against this tactic is start with T3 and build an AA HT which willl be hardcountered pretty fast if your soviet opponent started with T2 or use that super-OP tank hunters doctrine. Or you can rely on more sturmpios, get close and be fast while doing it.
So OKW has some solutions too, in the end.
Once the Leig8 ISG is 330 MP all will be well.
What OKW should be worrying about is the new ML-20 and fast T70.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
15 Jul 2015, 06:40 AM
#32
Posts: 1487
There's no tactical movement in this game as long as people can just build green cover all over the map.
/rant
Thats not only rant about losing games. Thats a lie. In fact there are only few positions on the map were you can build usefull sandbags. In most places sandbags will serve for your enemy cuzz axis has mgs snipers and mortars right from the start and thats way can hold positions much better.
|
Playercard of eqdw |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
SteamId is set to private for user id aaa. Set it to public if you want to link to your playercard via your user id.
15 Jul 2015, 06:45 AM
#33
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedOKW spams sandbags too
But that's an an axis faction so its fine
Cons have a received accuracy penalty, sandbags are a MUST.
lieg got a price decrease, adapt and use it.
But that's an an axis faction so its fine
Cons have a received accuracy penalty, sandbags are a MUST.
lieg got a price decrease, adapt and use it.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
15 Jul 2015, 06:46 AM
#34
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Being able to spam sandbags isn't the issue, the issue is when I'm in a fire fight and a con horde can win it because they take no extra damage from pulling green cover out of their ass in the middle of a battle.
so if the enemy tries to magic in some green cover you can punish him for it.
Except Conscript sandbags have 5 times as much health and can't be crushed by light half tracks. OKW sandbags die to small arms fire easily or the very shrek of the volk that build it.
More like make all buildable objetcs give 25% more RA while constructing them.
so if the enemy tries to magic in some green cover you can punish him for it.
OKW spams sandbags too
But that's an an axis faction so its fine
Cons have a received accuracy penalty, sandbags are a MUST.
lieg got a price decrease, adapt and use it.
Except Conscript sandbags have 5 times as much health and can't be crushed by light half tracks. OKW sandbags die to small arms fire easily or the very shrek of the volk that build it.
15 Jul 2015, 06:48 AM
#35
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Indeed, all units should have increased received accuracy while doing repairs/construction/salvaging.
15 Jul 2015, 06:50 AM
#36
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
Except Conscript sandbags have 5 times as much health and can't be crushed by light half tracks. OKW sandbags die to small arms fire easily or the very shrek of the volk that build it.
Asymmetrical balance
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
15 Jul 2015, 06:52 AM
#37
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Asymmetrical balance
Being able to spam sandbags isn't the issue, the issue is when I'm in a fire fight and a con horde can win it because they take no extra damage from pulling green cover out of their ass in the middle of a battle.
Indeed, all units should have increased received accuracy while doing repairs/construction/salvaging.
15 Jul 2015, 06:54 AM
#38
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedVolks dont have a penalty while constructing sandbags either.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
15 Jul 2015, 06:55 AM
#39
Posts: 1740
Building under fire should result in a lot more damage taken. That's all the nerf that's needed I think...
Yes Cons sandbags are annoying as hell but they really need them to survive.
But it's kind of ridiculous that it feels like they don't take any additional damage while building.
It is though God by command has withdrawn every other throne.
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
And God is saying 'No. These people will deal with me alone.'
15 Jul 2015, 06:56 AM
#40
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Volks dont have a penalty while constructing sandbags either.
It's almost like people think all units should have penalty for building while under fire.
0 user is browsing this thread:
SHOUT IT OUT!
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
Last Friday, 19:14 PM
Last Friday, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
Last Thursday, 16:35 PM
Last Thursday, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
Last Thursday, 13:33 PM
Last Thursday, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
Last Thursday, 12:13 PM
Last Thursday, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! 
Last Thursday, 10:49 AM
Last Thursday, 10:49 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. 
Last Wednesday, 20:27 PM
Last Wednesday, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM
situsgbo777: Platform game online terpercaya dengan berbagai pilihan permainan seru dan peluang menang besar. Nikmati pengalaman bermain terbaik hanya di GBO777
03 Mar 2025, 06:48 AM
03 Mar 2025, 06:48 AM
aerafield: @OKSpitfire tbh I find it quite challenging to get the Pershing in time, having to suffer through the CoH3 tickrate and this endless bullshit meta of massive blobs going back and forth to the forward heal truck
01 Mar 2025, 17:24 PM
01 Mar 2025, 17:24 PM
OKSpitfire: Well... going to be seeing the Pershing a lot for a little while, that thing is a monster.
01 Mar 2025, 11:44 AM
01 Mar 2025, 11:44 AM
Livestreams
 |
|
|
113 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.42963.872+7
- 2.52875.876+1
- 3.303163.650+3
- 4.289112.721+1
- 5.12644.741-1
- 6.312114.732+8
- 7.13765.678+5
- 8.14760.710-2
- 9.6817.800+6
- 10.764442.633-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
13
Download
1335
Board Info
234 users are online:
234 guests
6 posts in the last 24h
17 posts in the last week
59 posts in the last month
17 posts in the last week
59 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52482
Welcome our newest member, Sirpilla
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Sirpilla
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM