Login

russian armor

Cruzz's The More You Know

PAGES (58)down
14 Aug 2015, 03:45 AM
#221
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Aug 2015, 12:07 PMCruzz

USF:
Rifle/Lieut/Capt 97% 35 28/25/30 1.4/1.5/1.5


not quite accurate.

The thompson using officers doesn't get any RA bonus and cost 50 mp to reinforce.
the attendant rifleman models for the Lt and Capt do have the 3% bonus, but the attendant rear echelon (long coat) do not.

the two officer squads for the US are a mess really.
14 Aug 2015, 06:15 AM
#222
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

Question, Do MG42 and .50 Cal bulletins also affect bunkers and fighting positions or just the HMG units?
14 Aug 2015, 07:11 AM
#223
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Is better to build sandbags on red cover or on normal cover or it is on both the same ?
14 Aug 2015, 07:53 AM
#224
avatar of Trubbbel

Posts: 721

Is better to build sandbags on red cover or on normal cover or it is on both the same ?

You get, red, yellow or green cover. Build sandbags and you have green cover. It's directional though so if somebody gets behind you on a road then you are exposed.
14 Aug 2015, 08:06 AM
#225
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

14 Aug 2015, 08:44 AM
#226
avatar of Cruzz

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41



not quite accurate.


That list was purely for recrewing and mostly to show which squad you actually should recrew with (ie. definitely not captain because even the best (which is the one shown on the list) out of 3 crew outcomes you can get with it is worse in every way than a rifleman recrew)


Question, Do MG42 and .50 Cal bulletins also affect bunkers and fighting positions or just the HMG units?


Only HMG units


Is it possible to design a unit that is capable of shooting through small environmental objects (fences) and/or terrain but that cannot shoot through large shot blockers such as houses?


Yes
14 Aug 2015, 10:57 AM
#227
avatar of Cruzz

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41

Burst small arms and focus_fire: false

HMGs and a select number of other small arms have focus_fire: false. What this option does is effectively give every bullet two chances to hit, once as normal and if that one misses then it will check the scatter area for another target and try another hit roll. This is effectively extra damage (and suppression for HMGs) spread over random targets next to whatever you're firing at. You can see this effect with the Kubel pretty easily as it often leaves squads with a lot of models but low health due to on average firing 1.8 bullets at random targets for every 1 that hits the model it's firing on.


Small arms with focus_fire: false:
BAR
Grease Gun
hmg42
mp40
mp44
ppsh
Maxim
DSHK
hmg34
fg42
kubel
OKW mp44
14 Aug 2015, 14:21 PM
#228
avatar of Jaedrik

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

Bless you, Cruzz, and everyone else who has contributed to this thread, you're doing God's work.
Here's my little bit.



Shock troops aren't the only ones with armor.
Precisely 1 model out of 5 of the OST Assault Grenadier's squad is labeled as a "leader" in the game files, and has 1.5 armor. Literally every other stat is shared between the models.
14 Aug 2015, 15:38 PM
#229
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

Indeed, thanks a bunch for all of this useful information. Knowing is half the battle~

Another bulletin question; are the % increases a flat increase (I.E. 3 more out of 100 shots will penetrate armor) or a % increase of the stat (I.E. 200 penetration is now 206 Penetration) and therefore units will higher base stats benefit more. Are those changes even really worth a damn? lol
14 Aug 2015, 17:17 PM
#230
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Get RET defensive stance like riflemen if they grab lmg ?
14 Aug 2015, 17:23 PM
#231
avatar of Switzerland
Donator 33

Posts: 545

Love the quote Cruzz, you need a smurf forum account called "The Onion Cruzz" for your clear bias.
14 Aug 2015, 17:47 PM
#232
avatar of Swift

Posts: 2723 | Subs: 1

Get RET defensive stance like riflemen if they grab lmg ?

Only Riflemen get the benefit of the LMG.
14 Aug 2015, 20:32 PM
#233
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

That focus fire thing is really interesting. I always wondered how Relic managed to make damage spread out over multiple models without recreating the mess that was Opposing Fronts on release.

For those who weren't there, in CoH1 every member in a squad shot at a single infantryman in a squad, which looked silly because the tracers from both squads would be pointed at one guy on the other side. Relic tried to fix this by having each model choose his own target. The problem was this lead to firefights where nobody died until the last few seconds, until entire squads suddenly died in one volley. Some players even accused Relic of adding "Squad Health" because squads died so quickly when their collective health ran low. PE suffered the most due to their small squad sizes, and having 4 men with less than 1/4 health wasn't rare. They reverted the system after complaints.
15 Aug 2015, 01:58 AM
#234
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

That focus fire thing is really interesting. I always wondered how Relic managed to make damage spread out over multiple models without recreating the mess that was Opposing Fronts on release.

For those who weren't there, in CoH1 every member in a squad shot at a single infantryman in a squad, which looked silly because the tracers from both squads would be pointed at one guy on the other side. Relic tried to fix this by having each model choose his own target. The problem was this lead to firefights where nobody died until the last few seconds, until entire squads suddenly died in one volley. Some players even accused Relic of adding "Squad Health" because squads died so quickly when their collective health ran low. PE suffered the most due to their small squad sizes, and having 4 men with less than 1/4 health wasn't rare. They reverted the system after complaints.


dow2 had a similar (possibly the same) system in place for a lot of the bolter weapons for a long time. the result was that stacking a bunch of squads in a line spread the dps of units like space marines out along all the units which made it much harder to kill models.
15 Aug 2015, 02:11 AM
#235
avatar of Cyanara

Posts: 769 | Subs: 1

Just another thought on the "cover less than 10 units away doesn't count": Does that mean that wiring off cover is pointless, or is that enough distance to give the defenders the benefit of cover while denying it to the attackers?
15 Aug 2015, 02:18 AM
#236
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Correct me if i'm wrong, but against green cover you are still receiving .5 damage. What is negated is the accuracy modifier.
15 Aug 2015, 02:21 AM
#237
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Aug 2015, 02:11 AMCyanara
Just another thought on the "cover less than 10 units away doesn't count": Does that mean that wiring off cover is pointless, or is that enough distance to give the defenders the benefit of cover while denying it to the attackers?


it certainly helps for long ranged fights so that the enemy can't camp there and shoot at you on approach. idk how much it help for close ranged stuff though.
15 Aug 2015, 07:22 AM
#238
avatar of Cyanara

Posts: 769 | Subs: 1


it certainly helps for long ranged fights so that the enemy can't camp there and shoot at you on approach.


Ah, that's a good thought. Although the wall would still be potentially blocking your shots as you approach, so at best it simply levels the playing field.

So is the shot-blocking effect of cover calculated at a flat rate, and by getting within that range of 10 units it then stops having a negative effect on your shots? In which case, the distance of wire would be very relevant.
15 Aug 2015, 11:35 AM
#239
avatar of Cruzz

Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41

Correct me if i'm wrong, but against green cover you are still receiving .5 damage. What is negated is the accuracy modifier.


You are wrong, both modifiers are negated.

Now to give the usual suspects something to abuse. Was pretty disappointed to see nothing about this issue had been fixed the past year.

How Suppression Works:
Penalties for suppression and pin


Penalties for firing on suppressed/pinned units

Suppression value required for suppress: 0.2
Suppression value required for pin: 0.6
Suppression value at which unit recovers from suppress: 0.15
Suppression value at which unit recovers from pin: 0.5
Suppression modifiers against cover: 0.1 green, 0.5 yellow, 1 nothing, 1.5 red.
Suppression recovery rate: 0.008 per second, multiplied by 0.5 in red, 1 in nothing, 2.5 in yellow, 5 in green
Units gain a 50* multiplier to recovery rate after 7 seconds of being out of combat.

Suppression is a squad value. Individual models don't feature into the equation except for the guy the suppressing weapon is firing on, whose cover will be used to determine the penalty applied to both regular suppression and AOE suppression. Suppression is always applied regardless of whether the bullet hits or misses. AOE suppression is only applied on hit.

Now let me explain why this is utterly broken. Because aoe suppression takes its modifier from the thing that its firing on, this means that any squad in front of green cover being shot at will make stuff behind the green cover suppress extremely fast as well through aoe suppression. AOE suppression also triggers from vehicles, especially as they are guaranteed to be hit with their large target sizes, leading to even faster aoe suppression behind green cover. And to top it all off you can fire on neutral structures like built razorwire, tank traps, and empty buildings* on map , to gain massive aoe suppression against green cover without any way for your opponent to avoid it. Only soviet sandbags have been fixed of this issue, every other neutral object is free game for suppression abuse

*Units fire silly short bursts against empty buildings so they aren't too good for this. Still way better than firing at green cover though.

Recovery works in combat, though is clearly interrupted by some events like receiving and receiving damage. As such while it's fairly easy to keep units not in cover suppressed just by firing at them occasionally because the natural recovery speed will take quite a while to remove suppression, against units in green cover you will have to be actively doing something to them in order to stop them from recovering.

Incremental accuracy is probably +15% for every 2 or 3 models in the search area in addition to the one being fired upon. It's definitely not per each model. Takes too long to test to give a certain answer.

15 Aug 2015, 15:13 PM
#240
avatar of Jabba

Posts: 80

Cruzz our Lord and Savior has spoken. this is the truth you all wanted to see.
I completely agree with cruzz OpieOP

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Aug 2015, 11:35 AMCruzz


You are wrong, both modifiers are negated.

Now to give the usual suspects something to abuse. Was pretty disappointed to see nothing about this issue had been fixed the past year.

How Suppression Works:
Penalties for suppression and pin


Penalties for firing on suppressed/pinned units

Suppression value required for suppress: 0.2
Suppression value required for pin: 0.6
Suppression value at which unit recovers from suppress: 0.15
Suppression value at which unit recovers from pin: 0.5
Suppression modifiers against cover: 0.1 green, 0.5 yellow, 1 nothing, 1.5 red.
Suppression recovery rate: 0.008 per second, multiplied by 0.5 in red, 1 in nothing, 2.5 in yellow, 5 in green
Units gain a 50* multiplier to recovery rate after 7 seconds of being out of combat.

Suppression is a squad value. Individual models don't feature into the equation except for the guy the suppressing weapon is firing on, whose cover will be used to determine the penalty applied to both regular suppression and AOE suppression. Suppression is always applied regardless of whether the bullet hits or misses. AOE suppression is only applied on hit.

Now let me explain why this is utterly broken. Because aoe suppression takes its modifier from the thing that its firing on, this means that any squad in front of green cover being shot at, will make stuff behind the green cover suppress extremely fast as well. AOE suppression also triggers from vehicles, especially as they are guaranteed to be hit with their large target sizes, leading to even faster aoe suppression behind green cover. And to top it all off you can fire on neutral structures like built razorwire, tank traps, and empty buildings* on map , to gain massive aoe suppression against green cover without any way for your opponent to avoid it. Only soviet sandbags have been fixed of this issue, every other neutral object is free game for suppression abuse

*Units fire silly short bursts against empty buildings so they aren't too good for this. Still way better than firing at green cover though.

Recovery works in combat, though is clearly interrupted by some events like receiving and receiving damage. As such while it's fairly easy to keep units not in cover suppressed just by firing at them occasionally because the natural recovery speed will take quite a while to remove suppression, against units in green cover you will have to be actively doing something to them in order to stop them from recovering.

Incremental accuracy is probably +15% for every 2 or 3 models in the search area in addition to the one being fired upon. It's definitely not per each model. Takes too long to test to give a certain answer.

PAGES (58)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

United Kingdom 203
United States 40
United States 16

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

809 users are online: 809 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49122
Welcome our newest member, Harda621
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM