don't you mean THIS abram's tank?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Abrams%27_Sherman_West_Point_Museum_02.JPG
No, the tank he posted was the M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank.
Pershing ?
1 Jul 2015, 03:55 AM
#101
Posts: 4928
No, the tank he posted was the M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
1 Jul 2015, 04:27 AM
#102
Posts: 341
Honestly the only problem I see with introducing a balanced Pershing would be the crew abuse...so just make it like the KT...when you use crew repair only part of the crew hops out to fix the problem and when it is fixed they hop straight back in.
1 Jul 2015, 05:09 AM
#103
1 Posts: 440
Dont you think its a bit debatable if all those Sturmtiges saw actual combat or not?
Those 20 M26s were part of the Zebra mission where they immediatly got split between the 3rd and the 9th armored divisions and then sent to fight along the Roer river with the Lovelady Task Force in 1945, during those battles 1 M26 got knocked out near Elsdorf and then an M26 claimed a Tiger I kill along with a Panzer IV kill during the very same battle.
Source: https://ospreypublishing.com/m26-m46-pershing-tank-1943-53
As he said, he is NOT the most reliable source
1 Jul 2015, 06:07 AM
#104
Posts: 2070
pershing is in the game files.
also about the pop cap abuse bug. i heard it was a feature/intentional but they could always fix it
also about the pop cap abuse bug. i heard it was a feature/intentional but they could always fix it
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
1 Jul 2015, 06:08 AM
#105
Posts: 2070
44
As he said, he is NOT the most reliable source
zaloga is one of the top academics in the ww2 armored warfare field.
Axis doesn't have the best AT options in the game
1 Jul 2015, 07:38 AM
#106
1 Posts: 440
44
zaloga is one of the top academics in the ww2 armored warfare field.
No no, I was talking about Alex
1 Jul 2015, 12:31 PM
#107
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
pershing is in the game files.
also about the pop cap abuse bug. i heard it was a feature/intentional but they could always fix it
They said it was a feature specifically because they couldn't fix it. It's not like the Pershing would need to be able to decrew itself to be good anyway.
No no, I was talking about Alex
Being half dead while on painkillers will do that to you~
But it's adorable how you follow me around nipping at my heels like a small animal desperate for attention.
1 Jul 2015, 12:48 PM
#108
Posts: 618
No, the tank he posted was the M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank.
It's a joke. That M4A3E8 was crewed by Creighton Abrams, whom the Abrams Main Battle Tank was named after.
2 Jul 2015, 00:38 AM
#109
Posts: 1026
Sturmtiger saw action in the Battle of the Bulge, so it fits.
The USF is mainly themed around Bulge but it's not a contractual obligation to never include anything else. The STG44 vampir that OKW gets wasn't fielded in active combat until February '45, but OKW gets it anyway. If they didn't want to "historically flub it", perhaps there upcoming content focused on things after Bulge, ToW missions or something? We might get a couple of new doctrines for OKW and USF like I was speculating for ages. And no, this isn't [NDA] stuff. I have no idea.
2 Jul 2015, 02:44 AM
#110
Posts: 27
This is a video game guys. The company doesn't have steel quality in it's mechanics lmao
3 Jul 2015, 13:29 PM
#111
Posts: 97
if the pershing comes one day ... THIS WILL BE A DREAM COMING TRUE!! and if that happen ... the cry of all those axis fanboys will be real.
I'll just see the Pershing's tears facing a 128mm Pak44 right in front of his eyes.
And it will be the same thing for both Tigers.
3 Jul 2015, 13:46 PM
#112
Posts: 228
I'll just see the Pershing's tears facing a 128mm Pak44 right in front of his eyes.
And it will be the same thing for both Tigers.
the pershing is not a super tank and will be killed like every other tank, but the axis fanboys will be like ´´ this is against faction design !!´´ MI MI MI...
you guys did this to us telling relic to not give us the pershing, for a year..
and if it comes, i want to see all your axis fanboys crying for a whole year.
3 Jul 2015, 14:24 PM
#113
Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7
I stoped it reading somewhere in page 4 when i realised this thread changed into Historical revue ....
Pershing woul be fine if it wont be having its crew like other USA tanks so you ll need to make echelons to repair it , you cant abuse Pop cap with pershing and it dont get Superglue®
EDIT I would like to see pershing with changeable munition like sherman , one would be something like dozer sherman ammo and second will be something like m 36 ammo. Switch time will be 4-5 seconds
Pershing woul be fine if it wont be having its crew like other USA tanks so you ll need to make echelons to repair it , you cant abuse Pop cap with pershing and it dont get Superglue®
EDIT I would like to see pershing with changeable munition like sherman , one would be something like dozer sherman ammo and second will be something like m 36 ammo. Switch time will be 4-5 seconds
3 Jul 2015, 14:39 PM
#114
3 
Posts: 545
I find it amusing that there is concern for multiple Pershings here, yet in the KT threads "If he gets a second KT it's your fault" lol.
3 Jul 2015, 15:34 PM
#115
Posts: 978
I find it amusing that there is concern for multiple Pershings here, yet in the KT threads "If he gets a second KT it's your fault" lol.There´s a distinct difference between a vehicle obtained by:
Reaching the end of tech tree,
with a fuel penalty,
no ability to build fuel caches,
for about the highest fuel cost ingame (only topped by the JT)
versus
a call in, no tech vehicle for a faction that has regular income and fuel caches.
So yeah, unless Allied call ins cost 390 fuel, you got horrendously outplayed, if there are two KTs.
3 Jul 2015, 17:17 PM
#116
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I find it amusing that there is concern for multiple Pershings here, yet in the KT threads "If he gets a second KT it's your fault" lol.
The Pershing would be a call in, call in spam is cancer.
4 Jul 2015, 08:18 AM
#117
Posts: 1891
The Pershing would be a call in, call in spam is cancer.
By the time Pershing comes call-in meta will be gone I assume.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
4 Jul 2015, 09:16 AM
#118
Posts: 618
What makes you think the Pershing wouldn't be limited like all other heavy tank call-ins?
4 Jul 2015, 09:34 AM
#119
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
By the time Pershing comes call-in meta will be gone I assume.
Let us hope.
What makes you think the Pershing wouldn't be limited like all other heavy tank call-ins?
If they gave it the ability to decrew itself like other USF tank's you could just pop the crew out and call in a new one.
4 Jul 2015, 09:37 AM
#120
4 Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1
If they gave it the ability to decrew itself like other USF tank's you could just pop the crew out and call in a new one.
They could just, not. You can't really say something won't work because Relic may mess-up, otherwise we would never get anything new.
Either way, I don't want a Pershing because I like USF as a medium tank heavy army. I'd rather see some fixes to current doctrines and units, as well as maybe the jumbo.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
9 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1000
Board Info
843 users are online:
843 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48726
Welcome our newest member, vanyaclinic02
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, vanyaclinic02
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM