Heavy Tank Limit
Posts: 1484
Heavy Tank Limit created by yours truly Relic has shifted the tank power to Axis. I think it is hilarious how OKW can build 2 heavy tanks while Soviets are restricted to 1. The funny thing about this is, Soviets medium armor "T-34/76" is garbage against P4 and Su-85s struggle against Panthers. The only viable strategy is T-34/85 callin?
Relic should either limit ALL armies to 1 Heavy or substantially buff Soviet medium armor.
Posts: 770
Heavy Tank Limit created by yours truly Relic has shifted the tank power to Axis. I think it is hilarious how OKW can build 2 heavy tanks while Soviets are restricted to 1. The funny thing about this is, Soviets medium armor "T-34/76" is garbage against P4 and Su-85s struggle against Panthers. The only viable strategy is T-34/85 callin?
Relic should either limit ALL armies to 1 Heavy or substantially buff Soviet medium armor.
Who gives a shit KT's are bad and overpriced . And t if he manages to get 2 KT's you really dropped the ball somewhere.
Posts: 978
Not to mention that picture shows 260 + ?290? fuel invested with a decreased income.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedEither player axis, avoid those game modes as allies, or play axis.
Frustrations gone
Posts: 130
Posts: 1702
Focus balance on 1v1,2v2.
Posts: 927
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Have fun investing 50 of your population cap into two vehicles. Map control is going to shift into the other teams favor quickly.
Not to mention that picture shows 260 + ?290? fuel invested with a decreased income.
In 4v4s each player only really needs to hold 1 key area most of the time, so having 2 heavy tanks at the same time really isn't a disadvantage.
And fuel income in big team games is always high. Getting two heavies as OKW is no special feat in the average 45 minute 4v4.
Posts: 1484
Who gives a shit KT's are bad and overpriced . And t if he manages to get 2 KT's you really dropped the ball somewhere.
Price shouldn't justify balance at all. At this moment, OKW is free to roam with Heavy tanks, especially late game. Don't forget in 4 v 4s OKW has no problem fielding two. My only problem is that T-34 and Su-85s on certain maps cannot do the job where if I had two IS-2s or ISU-152. In 4 v 4s, the Axis can field more than one Panthers, P4s and now Heavies. The only thing I can build is ONE IS-2 and shitty T-34s against that match up.
Posts: 1484
Lol all i see is a really bad Allied team or a team of AI. Or both.
This was a top 5 team as Axis, we are not too bad either.
Posts: 954
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
Move along.
Posts: 64
Posts: 987
Posts: 1701
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
While axis can get 1 tiger, you can get normally 4 T85, so who has the *power* now
230 axis fuel=520 allied fuel
#axifanboyslogic
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
While axis can get 1 tiger, you can get normally 4 T85, so who has the *power* now
Axis, clearly axis. Because panthers.
Posts: 1484
While axis can get 1 tiger, you can get normally 4 T85, so who has the *power* now
What if I don't pick Guards mortar? You expect Allies to stop Panthers, KTs and Jagds with 1 IS2s and bunch of garbage mediums?
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
What if I don't pick Guards mortar? You expect Allies to stop Panthers, KTs and Jagds with 1 IS2s and bunch of garbage mediums?
Get Su 76s and 85s?
Like, learn to counter?
Livestreams
7 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, brainpowerwellnessin
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM