Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » Encountered a very effective allied tactic

Encountered a very effective allied tactic

  • This thread is locked
PAGES (3)down
New topic New topic    
Squeaky Door 96
9 Jun 2015, 20:27 PM
#41
avatar of Squeaky Door 96

Posts: 192

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 19:10 PMsome one

So why you didn't like my post about 'how I Encountered a very effective axis tactic' it is exactly the same and what is more important absolutly true or anyone think it is not?

Double standards?


I think it has more to do with the fact that you made it very obvious that you were hostile and needed some attention becuase, like I said in a previous post, you are bitter about something game or player related, thus you make a rant. Yet you can't expect people who don't have influence on such a matter or have anything to do with the matter take you seriously if you act like this.
Stalin is said to have replied: "What fool will sell us his secrets?"
Reply Reply Multi Quote
CookiezNcreem
9 Jun 2015, 20:44 PM
#42
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 20:23 PMSqueaky Door 96


Nowhere in my post did I make any of these claims or assumptions. I just stated that I encoutered a very effective tactic, which others might want to use, because I have seen many people complain about Germans being to powerfull. So I thought, let me share the tactic that defeated me and my friend very effectively.

I placed it in gameplay? That is not suited for this kind of stuff? Duely noted than.



Ive been around here a while,read alot of posts... and coh2 central as a whole rarely has topics and discussion that are "good hearted/intent.". Threads like mirageflas voice acting thread are in the minority.

Theyre almost always whine threads and balance complaints. regardless of the subforum in coh2 central.

Now if you posted that in state office,the strategy forum :foreveralone: there would be no trolling or trolls. :foreveralone:

Just please note in the future that coh2 central is basical the cesspool of bitching.
most people/trolls took this thread as another balance complaint,even if it wasnt.

Personally I saw this as a typical strategy post,just in the wrong forum.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Squeaky Door 96
9 Jun 2015, 21:14 PM
#43
avatar of Squeaky Door 96

Posts: 192

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 20:44 PMCookiezNcreem



Ive been around here a while,read alot of posts... and coh2 central as a whole rarely has topics and discussion that are "good hearted/intent.". Threads like mirageflas voice acting thread are in the minority.

Theyre almost always whine threads and balance complaints. regardless of the subforum in coh2 central.

Now if you posted that in state office,the strategy forum :foreveralone: there would be no trolling or trolls. :foreveralone:

Just please note in the future that coh2 central is basical the cesspool of bitching.
most people/trolls took this thread as another balance complaint,even if it wasnt.

Personally I saw this as a typical strategy post,just in the wrong forum.


Thankyou Cookie, I will do that from now on!

Are you also active in the strategy section and VonIvan etc as well? I would love to make some posts concerning advice.
Stalin is said to have replied: "What fool will sell us his secrets?"
Reply Reply Multi Quote
JohnnyB
10 Jun 2015, 07:29 AM
#44
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 18:03 PMVonIvan




Fast Stuka/P2 = profit vs Dhsk spam. :foreveralone:
Shermans will get owned by Panthers. Heck, even dbl pumas can do well. :foreveralone:
Vs Jacksons/Paratroopers: Raketens vs Jacksons, and Obers vs Airborne + P2 to counter airborne :foreveralone:


"Shermans will get owned by Panthers" - let's be more accurate, no? did you in fact mean "you can resist with one Panther against 2-3 Shemanns?"

"Heck, even dbl pumas can do well" - of course, but not if Jackson arrives. And double pumas will be all that you will get. In soviets' case, going double Pumas may be suicide because of 85s or IS2 call-ins. The only situation where I was able to effectively use Puma throughout the game was when I stacked 3 penetration bulletins for this unit.

But who am I to argue with COHSUPERFABULOUSEXPERTS? :foreveralone:
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
CookiezNcreem
10 Jun 2015, 16:05 PM
#45
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 07:29 AMJohnnyB


"Shermans will get owned by Panthers" - let's be more accurate, no? did you in fact mean "you can resist with one Panther against 2-3 Shemanns?"

"Heck, even dbl pumas can do well" - of course, but not if Jackson arrives. And double pumas will be all that you will get. In soviets' case, going double Pumas may be suicide because of 85s or IS2 call-ins. The only situation where I was able to effectively use Puma throughout the game was when I stacked 3 penetration bulletins for this unit.

But who am I to argue with COHSUPERFABULOUSEXPERTS? :foreveralone:


:foreveralone::foreveralone::foreveralone::foreveralone::foreveralone:
Reply Reply Multi Quote
SwonVIP
10 Jun 2015, 16:26 PM
#46
avatar of SwonVIP
Donator 11

Posts: 640

Spamming jackson with a pair of scotts is probably the most common tactic.
Playercard of SwonVIP

2v2: Pstreak: + 2with d0ggY^
2v2: Pstreak: + 1with Pappy O´Daniel
4v4: Pstreak: + 7with Pappy O´Daniel, JDR, & Sunless Ocean, Starless Sky
4v4: Pstreak: - 1with Mik, Pappy O´Daniel, & JDR


Reply Reply Multi Quote
VonIvan
10 Jun 2015, 16:35 PM
#47
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 07:29 AMJohnnyB


"Shermans will get owned by Panthers" - let's be more accurate, no? did you in fact mean "you can resist with one Panther against 2-3 Shemanns?"


No, you can own 3-5 Shermans with two Panthers. :D


jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 07:29 AMJohnnyB

"Heck, even dbl pumas can do well" - of course, but not if Jackson arrives. And double pumas will be all that you will get. In soviets' case, going double Pumas may be suicide because of 85s or IS2 call-ins. The only situation where I was able to effectively use Puma throughout the game was when I stacked 3 penetration bulletins for this unit.

Two pumas can still own a Jackson easily, I hope you know that.(may or may not require micro) :foreveralone: Vs Soviets using the Dbl pumas at range can easily deal with a pair of 85s(with support you'll have an even easier time). Once you have vet on at least one of your pumas you can also hit each t-34/85 with the precision shot ability and force his main gun to be stuck in a certain direction for a good amount of time, thus allowing you to finish it off. :foreveralone:

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 07:29 AMJohnnyB

But who am I to argue with COHSUPERFABULOUSEXPERTS? :foreveralone:

I can feel that butthurt from outside my window. It's like a breeze of fresh air just purified my delicate environment around me.

Reply Reply Multi Quote
JohnnyB
10 Jun 2015, 18:53 PM
#48
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 16:35 PMVonIvan



Two pumas can still own a Jackson easily, I hope you know that.(may or may not require micro) :foreveralone: Vs Soviets using the Dbl pumas at range can easily deal with a pair of 85s(with support you'll have an even easier time). Once you have vet on at least one of your pumas you can also hit each t-34/85 with the precision shot ability and force his main gun to be stuck in a certain direction for a good amount of time, thus allowing you to finish it off. :foreveralone:


Don't talk like those 85s are alone on the field. And I saw so many times puma shells failing against 85s and even weaker armor that I don't have fingers at my hands and feet to count even if I add yours too. Let's not assume the 85s user is an idiot, shall we? That is why I spoke about penetration bulletins....

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 16:35 PMVonIvan

I can feel that butthurt from outside my window. It's like a breeze of fresh air just purified my delicate environment around me.



Buthurt? Why? I don't understand. Besides, using the words "but" and "fresh air" in the same post feels a little odd, don't ya think?
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
some one
10 Jun 2015, 19:28 PM
#49
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 20:23 PMSqueaky Door 96


because I have seen many people complain about Germans being to powerfull


I don't know why people arguing here. I am personally see that topic starter created a troll post from the beginning.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
some one
10 Jun 2015, 19:29 PM
#50
avatar of some one

Posts: 935

.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
VonIvan
10 Jun 2015, 20:25 PM
#51
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 18:53 PMJohnnyB


Don't talk like those 85s are alone on the field. And I saw so many times puma shells failing against 85s and even weaker armor that I don't have fingers at my hands and feet to count even if I add yours too. Let's not assume the 85s user is an idiot, shall we? That is why I spoke about penetration bulletins....

You misinterpreted what I said, as I was describing different scenarios involving the dbl puma, sometimes you'll be fighting lone 85s charging in, and sometimes you wont, that's why you have stukas to clear out AT-guns/inf blobs, and your own support inf with the pumas to take on the 85s. Also that penetration problem your having is honestly only slightly applicable vs IS-2/ISU frontal armor at times, if it occurred to anything else it was either A. Bad RNG or B. At Vet 0 :foreveralone:
jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 18:53 PMJohnnyB

Buthurt? Why? I don't understand. Besides, using the words "but" and "fresh air" in the same post feels a little odd, don't ya think?

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jun 2015, 08:44 AMJohnnyB


Finally, an accurate and non-biased analysis. Congratulations sir.

:foreveralone:
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Tea Maker Machine
10 Jun 2015, 21:45 PM
#52
avatar of Tea Maker Machine

Posts: 270

Elite RM/DshK to Easy8/M4c are only effective if you aren't dealing with poopchain43 blobs or PAK walls and you also had a massive early game advantage.
jump backJump back to quoted post18 Jun 2015, 10:57 AMKatitof
I'll try again.

The source of my frustrations that should be removed

Reply Reply Multi Quote
JohnnyB
11 Jun 2015, 07:07 AM
#53
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jun 2015, 20:25 PMVonIvan

You misinterpreted what I said, as I was describing different scenarios involving the dbl puma, sometimes you'll be fighting lone 85s charging in, and sometimes you wont, that's why you have stukas to clear out AT-guns/inf blobs, and your own support inf with the pumas to take on the 85s. Also that penetration problem your having is honestly only slightly applicable vs IS-2/ISU frontal armor at times, if it occurred to anything else it was either A. Bad RNG or B. At Vet 0


I can see what you mean and it looks nice on paper but 2 pumas and one wurframen means you will only have the OKW t3. You won't afford not even t2-medic truck (ok, I'm exagerrating, but you get the idea). I beat the shit out of an OKW-guy who was only relying on puma spaming and used just 76s :foreveralone: and ZIS. Was I lucky and he was a noob? Possibly. But this is not the idea. The idea is that I wouldn't trade my good old panther even if I build just one on pumas not in a hundred years. But who am I to argue with... I said this once allready, didn't I? :p:D
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
BeefSurge
13 Jun 2015, 15:03 PM
#54
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

An army of over three Paratroopers with LMGs and 1 pathfinder deploying beacons, recon, and sniping is the best infantry army ingame, I won't lie. The thing is though Paras have a hefty initial deployment, (380)and LMGs are 120 munitions.

They also come late at 3 CP. The best way to counter this is apply lots of early game pressure. If you force the enemy into rifle spam or a fast light vehicle, you delay paras.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
Jason
14 Jun 2015, 10:44 AM
#55
avatar of Jason

Posts: 82

Spamming Jacksons is quite common now given they're only 125 fuel.
Reply Reply Multi Quote
WiFiDi
14 Jun 2015, 15:38 PM
#56
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

okay ive clearly ignored this for to long. it needs to close (author is free to make another similar thread in the right section) but clearly this thread isn't going anywhere and frankly fell off the tracks from the first post, (which you can't see cause its invised :P).
:hyper: Failure is always an option. :crazy:
:D It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!):thumbsup:
:*( Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. :hyper:
:lol: To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! :lolol:
:P and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!:nahnah:
Reply Reply Multi Quote
PAGES (3)down
New topic New topic    
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Gameplay » Encountered a very effective allied tactic

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
Today, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
Today, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
Today, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
Yesterday, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
Yesterday, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
Yesterday, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
Yesterday, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
Yesterday, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
Yesterday, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
Yesterday, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
Yesterday, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
Last Wednesday, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
Last Wednesday, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
Last Wednesday, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
Last Wednesday, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
Last Wednesday, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
Last Wednesday, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
Last Wednesday, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
Last Wednesday, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
Last Wednesday, 03:52 AM

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
13
 Download
Download
1339
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

191 users are online: 191 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
25 posts in the last week
70 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52600
Welcome our newest member, Beldxscc55
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM