Satellite control of demo charge is not really a 1941 or 1944 weapon neither
LOL this made my day.
T-34 needs a buff
8 Jun 2015, 16:58 PM
#81
Posts: 1484
LOL this made my day.
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
8 Jun 2015, 16:58 PM
#82
3 
Posts: 545
Horse and cart was the Whermachts primary mover even in 44 Alex so guess we can change the half track to carts and use the history as justification right. Fact is the 76 is crap, and being stubborn about it is wonderful. And yes the OKW does have units that didn't see much deployment until late 44 early 45, wouldn't matter much if there wasn't so many soviet units and commanders that are unreliable,leaving us in call in land.
8 Jun 2015, 18:03 PM
#83
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedAll the t34 needs is a cost decrease, its not supposed to be a panzer4 equivalent for less resources.
1337 h4X0R, dank memes
axis
8 Jun 2015, 18:11 PM
#84
3 Posts: 545
Or keep the cost the same and buff it, as many patches of it having it be nothing great did nothing for it unless paired with industry. Buff it make it a preferred unit maybe you'll see people build a tier instead of wait all the time for call ins.
8 Jun 2015, 19:08 PM
#85
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Horse and cart was the Whermachts primary mover even in 44 Alex so guess we can change the half track to carts and use the history as justification right. Fact is the 76 is crap, and being stubborn about it is wonderful. And yes the OKW does have units that didn't see much deployment until late 44 early 45, wouldn't matter much if there wasn't so many soviet units and commanders that are unreliable,leaving us in call in land.
Nobody wants to go full Imperial Dane and have a Wehrmacht of nothing but StuG III's and horse drawn carts or T34's that fail half the time due to welding errors or poor crew training. Iv said in this very thread historical accuracy has nothing to do with unit performance.
I think the T34/76 needs a buff, it needs it's original ROF back and a slight cost decrease to 90 fuel.
8 Jun 2015, 20:05 PM
#86
3 Posts: 545
Making it come out 2 minuets sooner isn't going to solve much. It needs a Buff not a reversion to a time it still wasn't used much.
8 Jun 2015, 20:26 PM
#87
Posts: 1484
Making it come out 2 minuets sooner isn't going to solve much. It needs a Buff not a reversion to a time it still wasn't used much.
Yea this makes sense. The Tank needs something more.
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
8 Jun 2015, 20:55 PM
#88
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Making it come out 2 minuets sooner isn't going to solve much. It needs a Buff not a reversion to a time it still wasn't used much.
Did you not see were I mentioned returning it to it's original ROF? It would be a huge increase to it's DPS.
8 Jun 2015, 21:01 PM
#89
3 Posts: 545
It's original ROF, to a time it still wasn't popular. Or make other changes to make it better *beard scratch* yep that sounds better still.
8 Jun 2015, 21:59 PM
#90
Posts: 476
Why Queenratchet wants Pershing so hard? FFS l2p Kappa
8 Jun 2015, 22:59 PM
#91
1 
Posts: 551
Why Queenratchet wants Pershing so hard? FFS l2p Kappa
Maybe becouse Pershing would enrich the game with a lot of fresh new strats and break the boring jackson spam & kite meta
8 Jun 2015, 23:04 PM
#92
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe becouse Pershing would enrich the game with a lot of fresh new strats and break the boring jackson spam & kite meta
If you want to break jackson spam meta, then stop spamming tigers and panthers.
Its not like people use jacksons because they want to, they are being spammed as a response to panther and tiger spam, which USF have no answer to except it.
And pretty much the same case with current soviets and pitiful state of T3.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
8 Jun 2015, 23:04 PM
#93
1 Posts: 551
I voted no because buffing a unit from the strongest faction makes no sense even if that unit could be preforming better.
Sov tech is a mess but is supported by excellent callin options. Probably too much work to fix at this stage unfortunately.
There goes the democracy...
8 Jun 2015, 23:05 PM
#94
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
8 Jun 2015, 23:05 PM
#95
1 Posts: 551
If you want to break jackson spam meta, then stop spamming tigers and panthers.
Its not like people use jacksons because they want to, they are being spammed as a response to panther and tiger spam, which USF have no answer to except it.
And pretty much the same case with current soviets and pitiful state of T3.
I totally agree
8 Jun 2015, 23:35 PM
#96
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Cost decrease on T-34 won't help much. In fact it will make things worse as it will make first T-34 come faster which will cement good early game for Soviets.
But the main problem is that cheap units without late potential are not viable (conscripts, anyone?)
Also, why not just wait for the patch?
But the main problem is that cheap units without late potential are not viable (conscripts, anyone?)
Also, why not just wait for the patch?
8 Jun 2015, 23:57 PM
#97
Posts: 4928
Horse and cart was the Whermachts primary mover even in 44 Alex so guess we can change the half track to carts and use the history as justification right.
Horse and cart was not used in combat, so no that is not justification.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
9 Jun 2015, 00:07 AM
#98
Posts: 354
Maybe upgrade to OT-34/76, which will change frontal mg to flame thrower,
something like 100-120 mu (so you can't spam them), only frontal usage (very small ark), worse flamer characteristics than KV-8, generally - quite bad flamer, but flamer with it benefits. It was one of the most mass produced flamer tank of WW2 - 1170 OT-34/76 and 331 OT-34/85. It will solve - 1.performance against infantry, 2.late game potential, 3. munition float for SU, so you will chose between more mines/demos or T-34/76 upgrade.
something like 100-120 mu (so you can't spam them), only frontal usage (very small ark), worse flamer characteristics than KV-8, generally - quite bad flamer, but flamer with it benefits. It was one of the most mass produced flamer tank of WW2 - 1170 OT-34/76 and 331 OT-34/85. It will solve - 1.performance against infantry, 2.late game potential, 3. munition float for SU, so you will chose between more mines/demos or T-34/76 upgrade.
9 Jun 2015, 01:11 AM
#99
Posts: 1072
If you want to break jackson spam meta, then stop spamming tigers and panthers.
Its not like people use jacksons because they want to, they are being spammed as a response to panther and tiger spam, which USF have no answer to except it.
And pretty much the same case with current soviets and pitiful state of T3.
You really think its possible to spam those units?
9 Jun 2015, 02:08 AM
#100
1 Posts: 1276
Cheaper t-34 would be dumb, it needs a role and not crummy unit stats.
Give it a buff already
Give it a buff already
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
248 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
825 users are online:
825 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49070
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM