Login

russian armor

Does anyone miss StuGlife?

6 Jun 2015, 03:01 AM
#1
avatar of herrtin

Posts: 64

I simply love this tank, even if it's not that good like StuGIV in CoH1. Is there any buff in the new upcoming patch? It would be so good to play StuG in a more defensive role... What do u think?
6 Jun 2015, 03:13 AM
#2
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

Stug life is still alive and well with STUG e, :snfPeter:


However the STUG G will get its WELL deserved buff... :snfPeter: ..........

6 Jun 2015, 03:21 AM
#3
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Soon™

The lines of stugs rolling over everything will come... Unless they get flanked or destroyed by AT guns or tank destroyers.
6 Jun 2015, 03:31 AM
#4
avatar of CieZ

Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4

You can thank Dane for the current state of the StugG.

He just HAD to have his "infantry assault gun" or whatever stupidity he crusaded for. I think that was the last time Relic did/will listen to him for balance advice.
6 Jun 2015, 05:04 AM
#5
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jun 2015, 03:31 AMCieZ
You can thank Dane for the current state of the StugG.

He just HAD to have his "infantry assault gun" or whatever stupidity he crusaded for. I think that was the last time Relic did/will listen to him for balance advice.


It wasn't even that bad prior to its current iteration. It was my go-to counter for most armoured threats and it could still peg infantry pretty well, just not AoE them. Now it's saddening to see it to deflect off medium tanks.

Currently, against vehicles, it only really excels vs American tanks, but you need a meatshield and support and you generally won't get up to that point if you're facing a good USF as that stuff costs more than the Tiger.
6 Jun 2015, 05:50 AM
#7
avatar of Jaedrik

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

SOON™
I PRAY IT BUFF
AND IT WILL
I TRUST
I just hope it's still just as useful against infantry or something.
6 Jun 2015, 05:58 AM
#8
avatar of MarcoRossolini

Posts: 1042

I have a distinct feeling the only time the StuG was any good was when the game was in open beta prior to release.
6 Jun 2015, 10:41 AM
#9
avatar of SwonVIP
Donator 11

Posts: 640

I still like Stuggie :)
6 Jun 2015, 12:01 PM
#10
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

The Stug is still useful with the Elite Troops doctrine. 1 troop straining and it gets TWP. 1 vet1 stugG and a PAK can blow up a sherman in no-time.
6 Jun 2015, 17:53 PM
#11
avatar of herrtin

Posts: 64

It was like, get the StuG G asap and vet it while killing infantry to vet 1 so it can stun tanks. I hope it will get buffed, I loved it in CoH1 even if it was StuG IV
6 Jun 2015, 18:20 PM
#12
avatar of Cardboard Tank

Posts: 978

It was like, get the StuG G asap and vet it while killing infantry to vet 1 so it can stun tanks. I hope it will get buffed, I loved it in CoH1 even if it was StuG IV
I actually like that the current StuG can also kill infantry. It should have that advantage since it lacks the 60 range of other tank destroyers. The health should be buffed and the price should be increased.
6 Jun 2015, 18:22 PM
#13
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
What the stug G cant be good vs infantry and tanks? It can only be one or the other or be shitty at both?
6 Jun 2015, 19:00 PM
#14
avatar of Jaedrik

Posts: 446 | Subs: 2

What the stug G cant be good vs infantry and tanks? It can only be one or the other or be shitty at both?

People will complain that versatility means OP.
Which, sometimes it does, but in the case of the StuG-G, I'm confident there are other factors which can be used to balance it easily.
6 Jun 2015, 20:05 PM
#15
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

I would think that no one wants a turretless panzer iv... (Well, except he who wants Stug to be a specific way IE useless in practicality) and infantry killing power is not lacking in T3.
6 Jun 2015, 20:12 PM
#16
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

What the stug G cant be good vs infantry and tanks? It can only be one or the other or be shitty at both?

Well it's got a low price. Personally I liked it as an AT vehicle. T3's AI is already the Ostwind, and it's AI/AT is already the Panzer IV. That left T3 without any dedicated AT, though.

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jun 2015, 03:31 AMCieZ
You can thank Dane for the current state of the StugG.

The only way Dane can have his dream StuG is if the Jagdpanzer and StuG traded places, with the Jagdpanzer as Ostheer T3 AT, and StuG has OKW generalist.
6 Jun 2015, 20:17 PM
#17
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
I seriously see no issue with keeping the stugs lackluster, but not useless ai but increasing health armor and pen for a cost increase to like 110 fuel.
7 Jun 2015, 05:00 AM
#18
avatar of ThoseDeafMutes

Posts: 1026

I'm holding out for the Stuart buff, tbh.
7 Jun 2015, 09:45 AM
#19
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

However the STUG G will get its WELL deserved buff... :snfPeter: ..........


NDA :snfQuinn:
7 Jun 2015, 09:52 AM
#20
avatar of l4hti

Posts: 476

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

867 users are online: 867 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM