Jackson spam
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedPanther i'd say is the only real way to deal with a jackson. Infantry if your opponent isn't quite that good. ATleast in the late game. Early game you can bum rush it while you still have the edge, but nothing trades well against a jackson and the cumulative and reliable damage it causes to you over time will put you on the backfoot. Its almost like the obersoldaten of tank destroyers.
Not gonna say its OP except for the AP rounds, but its the best TD in the game pound for pound.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
Not gonna say its OP except for the AP rounds, but its the best TD in the game pound for pound.
jp4
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1653
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedPosts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1484
I will say that double jacksons is very hard to deal with. Add in a scott and your supporting riflemen. You can't really simply just compensate with shrecked infantry because the scott, just like the jackson is extremely cost effective and therefore share great synergy with each other.
This strategy requires tremendous amount of micro, the average player will have a difficult time kiting with scott/Rifiles and pulling Jacksons back from Shreks.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
This strategy requires tremendous amount of micro, the average player would give up and play axis.
fixed that for you
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
This strategy requires tremendous amount of micro, the average player will just go Soviets and full call in meta
fixed that for you
FTFY
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
This strategy requires tremendous amount of micro, the average player will gren blob into tiger spam
FTFY
fixed that for you
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently BannedPosts: 8154 | Subs: 2
/thread
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
This strategy requires tremendous amounts of micro, the average player will come to the forums to whine about how OP the other faction is.
It's like you're staring directly into my soul
Posts: 1162
And they could just fix USA pop cap abuse by giving the vehicle crews themselves the same pop cap as their tank, so when they exit, nothing would change..
Posts: 670
And they could just fix USA pop cap abuse by giving the vehicle crews themselves the same pop cap as their tank, so when they exit, nothing would change..
And when you lose the vehicle with crew outside, you are stuck with 0 dps shit unit
We've been through this multiple times.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Posts: 987
And when you lose the vehicle with crew outside, you are stuck with 0 dps shit unit
We've been through this multiple times.
Seems like a fitting result of losing your vehicle with the crew outside.
You can always banzai them into the MG42s. I don't really see a problem with the crews having high popcap. They can even keep their veterancy for the next vehicle. If they have no vet - kamikaze!!1!
Posts: 862
Best way to deal with Jackson is same way as Snipers, use shot blockers to prevent it from kiting.
And they could just fix USA pop cap abuse by giving the vehicle crews themselves the same pop cap as their tank, so when they exit, nothing would change..
I am not sure how the current meta truly stacks up... but prior to this patch it was certainly the case that a full 100 pop US late game army was not going to stand up to a 100 pop axis army with much more survivable heavies. harden the cap and you probably have to lower the pop cost and upkeep of US units.
Livestreams
56 | |||||
2 | |||||
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.620223.735-1
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.919405.694+3
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
litianyu0707
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Spdcderry
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM