Mortar Carriage

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 20:46 PMKwenRetchetWunToThre

guise tis isent funney i em cumplately seris abawt thes u gais r buleys tew

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 15:15 PMBurts

Why? I can look at your playercard and say that you really are not a good player. Neither is katitof, but he is a pretty okay player. And this arguement was not really targeted at you, but rather at bulgakov who was the first one here to attack players skill while being a very mediocre player himself.

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 15:15 PMBurts

Why? I can look at your playercard and say that you really are not a good player. Neither is katitof, but he is a pretty okay player. And this arguement was not really targeted at you, but rather at bulgakov who was the first one here to attack players skill while being a very mediocre player himself.

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 22:39 PMCorsin

All my playercard says is that i dont get much chance to play... in COh1 i was in the top 25 (1v1) for Wehrmacht and Brits for quite a while... Until the big reset.

Then i got a life and a job and my play time has gone down.

My ratios in 1v1 are still better than most. + lasted 48 mins in a 1v1 vs Jesulin. If im really not a good player pretty sure it would of taken alot less time to beat me.


But thats all assuming that i/we care about your opinion and that you know what youre talking about...


Clearly not. Im sorry you felt you were losing ground in the debate and felt the need to bring playercard into it.

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 06:27 AMGrumpy

It's because so many of the allied units are garbage, with many having been nerfed into oblivion after "discussions." It's made US and Soviet pretty boring most of the time. Now you start a "discussion" because you think one of the three semi-decent USF units is OP because someone used it well against you.

In the meantime, Axis players get vehicles that (in most cases) start out better, and then are given complete fantasy abilities (Pak43's shooting though forests, buildings, IR halftracks that can see through forests, buildings, etc) because somehow just being better units isn't enough.

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 06:27 AMGrumpy

It's because so many of the allied units are garbage, with many having been nerfed into oblivion after "discussions." It's made US and Soviet pretty boring most of the time. Now you start a "discussion" because you think one of the three semi-decent USF units is OP because someone used it well against you.

In the meantime, Axis players get vehicles that (in most cases) start out better, and then are given complete fantasy abilities (Pak43's shooting though forests, buildings, IR halftracks that can see through forests, buildings, etc) because somehow just being better units isn't enough.

Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 06:27 AMGrumpy

It's because so many of the allied units are garbage, with many having been nerfed into oblivion after "discussions." It's made US and Soviet pretty boring most of the time. Now you start a "discussion" because you think one of the three semi-decent USF units is OP because someone used it well against you.

In the meantime, Axis players get vehicles that (in most cases) start out better, and then are given complete fantasy abilities (Pak43's shooting though forests, buildings, IR halftracks that can see through forests, buildings, etc) because somehow just being better units isn't enough.