Twice now I have faced IS2s with no armor and raketens and they are awesome! Because of the cloak I am getting them to half health before he even knows whats happening. Yay to slightly more combined arms but now I feel OKW is just infantry tactics till you have enough fuel for 2 tanks then roll over the enemy. At the moment with the speed of firing and cloaking its a pure AT god.
Could OKW now afford a slight increase in price for volks shreks? (I personally hate facing and using blob tactics)
RaketenWerfer 43 op?
8 Apr 2015, 18:59 PM
#1
Posts: 55
8 Apr 2015, 19:03 PM
#2
Posts: 2779
That shit is, OP? Wut?
8 Apr 2015, 19:04 PM
#3
Posts: 578
...
8 Apr 2015, 19:06 PM
#4
Posts: 627
Racketenwerfers have excllent pen, reasonably good RoF and vet up very quickly.
Vet 0 ones are very vulnerable to tanks because of the short range, but vet them up a bit (easier then usual with the retreat capability) and they quickly become brutal. Vet 5 ones utterly wreck face, as usual.
Not as much as they used to when their damage bonus was bugged and they one shot literally anything, though.
Still. Not OP, I'd say, just alarmingly good with vet. And really squishy without.
Vet 0 ones are very vulnerable to tanks because of the short range, but vet them up a bit (easier then usual with the retreat capability) and they quickly become brutal. Vet 5 ones utterly wreck face, as usual.
Not as much as they used to when their damage bonus was bugged and they one shot literally anything, though.
Still. Not OP, I'd say, just alarmingly good with vet. And really squishy without.
8 Apr 2015, 19:07 PM
#5
2 
Posts: 1108
the old vet5 raketen was OP, it oneshotted IS2 with his first strike bonus and +10000% damage boost.
But now its finally usable and not OP
But now its finally usable and not OP
 | Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
8 Apr 2015, 19:07 PM
#6
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
They are finally viable units now.
8 Apr 2015, 19:07 PM
#7
Posts: 2053
Strange thread entitled "R43 OP" but appraises it for being useful and calling for a nerf of volk schreck blobs.
I certainly am happy with it; great to see tanks actually piss off at the sight of it.
I certainly am happy with it; great to see tanks actually piss off at the sight of it.
8 Apr 2015, 19:36 PM
#8
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Yea let's reduce both it's crew and damage to half.
8 Apr 2015, 19:42 PM
#9
Posts: 1701
lmfao
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
8 Apr 2015, 20:09 PM
#10
Posts: 1024 | Subs: 1
Kappa
8 Apr 2015, 20:58 PM
#11
Posts: 770
Twice now I have faced IS2s with no armor and raketens and they are awesome! Because of the cloak I am getting them to half health before he even knows whats happening. Yay to slightly more combined arms but now I feel OKW is just infantry tactics till you have enough fuel for 2 tanks then roll over the enemy. At the moment with the speed of firing and cloaking its a pure AT god.
Could OKW now afford a slight increase in price for volks shreks? (I personally hate facing and using blob tactics)
Mate the entire point of the volks was their vet not their AT. And the raketens are still nowhere as usefull as the pak
8 Apr 2015, 21:23 PM
#12
Posts: 542
Not op, but they should be good now.
8 Apr 2015, 21:49 PM
#13
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
They'll still die instantly once they make a wrong move, but the firing time reductions will make it way easier to do something and not make wrong moves (translated: Retreat once they start going to it after it fires).
8 Apr 2015, 22:13 PM
#14
14 Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
OP reads like "Praise the raketenwerfer" Moved to COH2 Gameplay
9 Apr 2015, 02:56 AM
#15
8 Posts: 2470
since people still don't look up pen values...
the only gun on that list with bad pen (ie. significantly different from the others) is the 57mm, which has shit pen.
for reference:
Code
Raketen
200.0/190.0/180.0
Pak
210.0/200.0/190.0
Zis
200.0/190.0/180.0
57mm
140.0/125.0/115.0
the only gun on that list with bad pen (ie. significantly different from the others) is the 57mm, which has shit pen.
for reference:
Code
Panzerschreck
180.0/170.0/160.0
Bazooka
130.0/120.0/110.0
9 Apr 2015, 05:37 AM
#16
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Raketens were always good, but people refused to use them because they aren't PAK-40s
I almost never built obers and I build raketens almost every game; so I was quite happy about the patch. It wasn't a nerf for me
I almost never built obers and I build raketens almost every game; so I was quite happy about the patch. It wasn't a nerf for me
Resident Soviet Whiner and Grand Master Bias Jedi; General Secretary of the Soviet Whine Hydra Collective; Axis Hating Sheeple; Allied Butt Buddy! Collect Them All!
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
9 Apr 2015, 05:59 AM
#17
Posts: 151
If you had told me on March 30th that I would be seeing Racketen 43 OP and PTRS OP threads, I would have laughed at you...
Its useful now, a refreshing change as now you dont need to spam volks to have at options.
Its useful now, a refreshing change as now you dont need to spam volks to have at options.
9 Apr 2015, 06:16 AM
#18
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
"raketenwerfer Op" he said
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
9 Apr 2015, 07:14 AM
#19
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Raketens were always good, but people refused to use them because they aren't PAK-40s
The only reason I don't usually call in raketens is the crew. No cover, they clump up and get insta-wiped
9 Apr 2015, 08:58 AM
#20
3 
Posts: 587
Dont you think its strange that rockets have different penetration values at different ranges, since i dont think rocket penetration cares about distance in real life...but i guess its balance
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
111 | ||
 |
|
|
41 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
144 | ||
|
|
|
|
29 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
833 users are online:
833 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM