Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Why don't you compare the rate of fore as well?
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
In this thread:
1. People who don't play the game and think PTRS are OP
2. People who have played the game and moved on with their lives, because PTRS is fine.
Posts: 106
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
so you lost a match? boo hoo
Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2
PTRS cons blobs are op but vetted volks blobs which thanks to acc bonuses snipe squads on retreat with shrecks are balanced. Hypocrite match.
Only op thing about PTRS conblobs their damage against team weapons.
Posts: 1484
Glad I'm not the only one who noticed this with the Shrecks.
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 122 | Subs: 2
in this thread:
1. People who are biased and think actual state of PTRS is fine for other units except guards;
2. People who are not biased and think that actual state of PTRS is not ok for other units except guards.
...and people like yourself who not only think that PTRS is fine, but abuse the hell out of PTRS conscript spam. Which is fine eventualy but not balanced. Lel.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
I don't even have the doctrine.
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Twice I have seen Shreks wiping squads now, but nope PTRS!
Posts: 122 | Subs: 2
Then you are speaking without knowing.
Posts: 403
PTRS cons blobs are op but vetted volks blobs which thanks to acc bonuses snipe squads on retreat with shrecks are balanced. Hypocrite match.
Only op thing about PTRS conblobs their damage against team weapons.
Posts: 976
Imagine Double PTRS Pathfinder
PTRS buff brings life to game admit it.Partisans,Tank Hunter commander,Guards chance of dropping PTRS while retreat Keepo
Posts: 1122
Strangely for the Axis side its ok for this to happen, but its not ok for a weapon that can do armour plate up to 40 mm in to turn a MG/Mortar/Pak into a hunk of scrap when hit.
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Posts: 1122
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Nobody talking about shreck destroying support weapons. Problem is shreck potency in infantry on infantry combat. Shrecks on volks, which is at upgrade and therefore should reduce ai power, in fact, increases volks ai power, allowing them to snipe 2 or even more models thanks to big aoe way too often.
.... example of rare occasion, but such occasions should not happen at all.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
The PTRS does 40 damage, the Gren Kar does 16 damage.
And what's even the point of the DP up for guards now?
I just hope they adjust it somehow, while it still remains a decent light AT as it is atm.
DPS is not everything, otherwise there would be no difference if the Elefant does 640 dmg per shot, but its reload is doubled - right?
,
You are wrong. guards with PTRS/lmg beats Ober with lmg head on. That should not be like that and it is fair enough considering their price difference, time they arrive, and teching Obers require and guards not.
Posts: 332
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
It is not question of realism. Don't get me wrong, i have no desire to see german ubermensch terminators fighting hordes of russians armed only with sapper shovels, but gameplay>realism for the sake of the game. Losing pak entirely to volley of ptrs shots as bad as losing clumped 2-3 man squad on retreat to marksman volksgren with his trusty rocket launcher which made to destroy tanks, but, apparently, kills infantry better than rifle. Both situations extreme examples of bad game design.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
 |
|
|
50 | ||
|
|
|
|
40 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
880 | ||
 |
|
|
56 | ||
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
18 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
