Zis Guns and Pak 40s
Posts: 14
For TLR skip to the BALANCING PROBLEM section...
Both of these AT guns perform very consistently against light vehicles and medium armour, the Pak very occasionally bounces T-34s but they have slopped armour so this can be deemed reasonable. If the Zis can bounce Pz4s I have not yet seen it happen in my 263 hours played but this isn't an issue.
FOR REFERENCE:
Against heavy armour there are some serious problems.
The Pak 40 statistically had 132mm of penetration at a 90 degree angle at 500 metres, so had to be far closer to penetrate IS-2 frontal armour. From a balance point of view it's very reasonable that a basic AT gun isn't likely to penetrate the frontal armour of a heavy tank. The pak doesn't have any issues with the KV series and performs fairly. When not comparing the Pak to the Zis, there are no issues.
The Soviet Zis gun, on the other hand, barely bounces when firing upon a tigers frontal armour, that's 100mm at a 90 degree angle. The Zis gun could not touch a tigers frontal armour unless it managed to strike a critical point like a vision port, so by that logic a Zis gun should not penetrate the tiger from the front most of the time. Zis guns only had 82mm of perpendicular penetration even at 100m.
Don't even get me started on the panther, 140mm (effective) sloped armour, Zis guns still seem to bounce very infrequently.
Then to make things even worse there's the elefant, 200mm of armour (even though not sloped). Zis Guns are a serious threat to even these beasts from the front.
BALANCING PROBLEM:
Now real life aside, it should be obvious what the issue is here. Zis guns effectively out perform Pak 40s simply because they actually hurt heavy tanks which they fire at. The Pak is regarded as the best AT gun in the game and while it does have the stun, in every other respect the Zis is just better
Pak40:
4 man crew
pens all tanks consistently excluding IS-2 and ISU (which it is useless against when firing at frontal armour)
stun ability
Zis Gun:
6 man crew, very good survivability vs mortars and grenades
Only has issues with the king tiger, it's a king tiger after all.
Based on the fact that Zis Guns can shut down panthers tigers and even elefants (although not so much elefants because you can sit outside Zis Gun range) while IS-2s will sit there bouncing consecutive frontal hits, the Zis gun is actually the better of the two AT guns.
The IS-2s armour could be considered the problem however it is a heavy tank and it;s fair enough that AT guns should have trouble, but this should be universal! The Zis gun does not deserve it's crazy effectiveness and superior usefulness over the Pak 40. The soviets have a tank destroyer option with an 85mm gun which they should be forced to rely on for dealing with heavier tanks as 2 AT guns should not be an immediate pain in the arse for german heavy armour, especially considering the soviets DO have other options which are redundant because the Zis gun's crazy goodness.
The Germans on the other hand, rely completely on the Pak 40 for long ranged AT support (unless elefant), while panzershreks are a decent supplement AT tool they still have issues with heavy armour and are not really worth the cost on pgrens, not to mention they really don't operate like tanks destroyers, more like glorified AT guns.
This issue really needs a fix, especially because of the poor neglected SU-85...
Posts: 760
Posts: 245
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
This is a troll thread, I feel like killing my self for reading this
Well, I wouldn't go that far...but yeah, the thread apparently believes only IS-2 exists for Soviets in addition to Tigers and Panthers get killed by ZiS-3s nearly instantly and Panthers don't out-range IS-2s.
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Stealing a pak is an axis players worst nightmare
And when it enters the dreams of Allies players, they wake up with sticky pants.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 14
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Posts: 135
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedPosts: 300
Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4
Intelligent/productive replies would be far more preferable to mindless comments ) Honestly if you think this is a troll thread you're pretty stupid considering there is obviously solid basis behind this, I wouldn't waste time on it otherwise. I am curious to hear feedback as to whether this is actually even the problem or if I've taken the wrong approach, perhaps tiger have an armour value bug or something which means they don't bounce hits, I dunno?
The pak has armor penetration 210/200/190.
The Zis has armor penetration 200/190/180.
All soviet tanks have less armor than their equivalent axis tank except for the IS-2. The Zis bounces shots much more on everything.
Basically everything you are saying is wrong.
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Intelligent/productive replies would be far more preferable to mindless comments ) Honestly if you think this is a troll thread you're pretty stupid considering there is obviously solid basis behind this, I wouldn't waste time on it otherwise. I am curious to hear feedback as to whether this is actually even the problem or if I've taken the wrong approach, perhaps tiger have an armour value bug or something which means they don't bounce hits, I dunno?
Pak40:
4 man crew
pens all tanks consistently excluding IS-2 and ISU (which it is useless against when firing at frontal armour)
stun ability
Zis Gun:
6 man crew, very good survivability vs mortars and grenades
Only has issues with the king tiger, it's a king tiger after all.
why did you not mention ROF?
Based on the fact that Zis Guns can shut down panthers tigers and even elefants (although not so much elefants because you can sit outside Zis Gun range) while IS-2s will sit there bouncing consecutive frontal hits, the Zis gun is actually the better of the two AT guns.
zis has less chance of penning elefants than pak penning is2. how can anyone take this thread not as a troll thread?
edit: damn it, i fell into the trap....
Posts: 300
only on mobile,MVForum
im on chrome(desktop) and cant see it
Posts: 14
I must just be incredibly unlucky, I've had disgusting luck with Pak guns vs IS-2s and also some unfortunate experiences with the tigers main gun bouncing frequently, I can upload a replay if people really want but it doesn't seem necessary.
It seems like the tiger being shit is more of a problem, really though as if that thing doesn't under perform... Doesn't help that I had a game where a several Zis literally did not fail to pen my panther a single time (frontal hits mostly). I'll ask about stats next time.
Posts: 300
finally, thankyou someone for providing the information I want via stats.
I must just be incredibly unlucky, I've had disgusting luck with Pak guns vs IS-2s and also some unfortunate experiences with the tigers main gun bouncing frequently, I can upload a replay if people really want but it doesn't seem necessary.
It seems like the tiger being shit is more of a problem, really though as if that thing doesn't under perform... Doesn't help that I had a game where a several Zis literally did not fail to pen my panther a single time (frontal hits mostly). I'll ask about stats next time.
ummm how exactly is the Tiger I crap again?
Posts: 622
Livestreams
30 | |||||
880 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, sunwinctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM