Login

russian armor

CoH 2 bonus unit

21 Nov 2012, 17:40 PM
#1
avatar of GenDodo

Posts: 74

Dogs with remote controlled bombs equivalent to the axis goliath.

Discuss....
21 Nov 2012, 18:13 PM
#2
avatar of FractionalEyes

Posts: 200

I can't wait...
21 Nov 2012, 19:08 PM
#3
avatar of Raindrop

Posts: 105

They did not carried remote controlled bombs.

So gameplaywise it should be like a seeker misslie targeted at an german tank with maybe a 30% chance that it will target a random soviet tank.

But I dont like the idea of sucide bomb dogs, So I would prefer to see mine-seeking dogs for soviets.
21 Nov 2012, 19:18 PM
#4
avatar of GenDodo

Posts: 74

I think it would be cool tbh, I love dogs but wouldn't it be cool to have such a unit :D
21 Nov 2012, 21:33 PM
#5
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Nov 2012, 19:18 PMGenDodo
I think it would be cool tbh, I love dogs but wouldn't it be cool to have such a unit :D


ah the history of these dogs see this was a total failure infact its kinda funny.

so they trained the dogs to carry bombs that detonated when they touched the bottom of the tank. (they later switched to remote control.) however since the soviets used soviet tanks to train them to achieve this task often times they would just run under a t34 and blow it up. that or they wouldn't do it at all.

i wouldn't mind (would love) seeing the Germans have Goliath and Soviets have dog unit however I imagine alot of people would go up in arms over such a unit as its cruel to dogs or some bs. politically it could be a nightmare for thq.
21 Nov 2012, 22:13 PM
#6
avatar of Basilone

Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2

Yeah it sounds cool but way too many PETA tards these days :D
21 Nov 2012, 23:21 PM
#7
avatar of TychoCelchuuu
Senior Caster Badge

Posts: 1620 | Subs: 2

I don't think objecting to dogs getting blown up makes you a PETA tard, or if it does, then we should all be PETA tards.
21 Nov 2012, 23:56 PM
#8
avatar of Sturmovik

Posts: 838

Oh noooo ! poor dogs :(
22 Nov 2012, 00:11 AM
#9
avatar of Basilone

Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2

Except they are actually just pixels on a screen, not dogs :P
22 Nov 2012, 00:17 AM
#10
avatar of Sturmovik

Posts: 838

lol yeah i know and it was all part of history and war..

but like WiFiDi said I bet alot of ... how should I say nicely... STUPID PEOPLE will go crazy over use of dogs in such way.. even thought it was all part of war..

but then again.. people kill dogs in Black Ops all day long..
22 Nov 2012, 02:16 AM
#11
avatar of Kolaris

Posts: 308 | Subs: 1

Slight difference in bloodthirsty dog trying to kill you and trained dog just happily doing what his master told him, then (bam)
22 Nov 2012, 02:45 AM
#12
avatar of Sturmovik

Posts: 838

what you taking about ? in Black Ops all dog wants to do is give you a hug :p
22 Nov 2012, 03:08 AM
#13
avatar of ApeMen

Posts: 65

the only thing i can think about dogs and how they could be usefull ingame are for spotting and detecting cloaked units
22 Nov 2012, 03:17 AM
#14
avatar of Sturmovik

Posts: 838

Thats good idea too..
also Soviets used dogs to carry med stuff and carry wounded in war..
22 Nov 2012, 04:00 AM
#15
avatar of Pepsi

Posts: 622 | Subs: 1

Dogs shouldn't be a unit by themselves (maybe some kind of long cooldown ability - like PE).
And btw, the recon dog thing would be pretty lame - as a dog won't say, wuut I've just spotted 2 gren squads and a sniper !

I'd prefer to see dogs used within a close-combat squad. For 2 duties, mine sweep and cannon fodder.
22 Nov 2012, 05:48 AM
#16
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Nov 2012, 04:00 AMPepsi
Dogs shouldn't be a unit by themselves (maybe some kind of long cooldown ability - like PE).
And btw, the recon dog thing would be pretty lame - as a dog won't say, wuut I've just spotted 2 gren squads and a sniper !

I'd prefer to see dogs used within a close-combat squad. For 2 duties, mine sweep and cannon fodder.


in this case hes referring to the russians employing dogs as suicide bombers. in this case they would work alot or exactly like Goliaths do in coh. (they used it for a brief stint in 1941.)

click here for edumacation.
22 Nov 2012, 15:22 PM
#17
avatar of GenDodo

Posts: 74

I rly don't see an issue if such a unit was/is introduced in the game and for the simply reason being that some arguments go with "it's not ok because people would object for it being an animal".

So in short... their argument is that killing human beings is ok while dogs is not in video games, kinda absurd don't you think?
22 Nov 2012, 16:00 PM
#18
avatar of Sturmovik

Posts: 838

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Nov 2012, 15:22 PMGenDodo
I rly don't see an issue if such a unit was/is introduced in the game and for the simply reason being that some arguments go with "it's not ok because people would object for it being an animal".

So in short... their argument is that killing human beings is ok while dogs is not in video games, kinda absurd don't you think?

lol yeha.. I know but u know there is always those that kind of people..
22 Nov 2012, 16:41 PM
#19
avatar of Relaxx666677676

Posts: 134

Didn't Rome Total War have dogs?
22 Nov 2012, 16:44 PM
#20
avatar of Twister
Honorary Member Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 2072 | Subs: 1

It also had (useless) incendiary pigs.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Livestreams

unknown 10
United States 40
United States 14

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

753 users are online: 753 guests
0 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49124
Welcome our newest member, hello88tube
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM