Which factions needs to be nerfed ?
27 Feb 2015, 12:41 PM
#1
Posts: 137
Select which factions are too strong and needs to be nerfed.
27 Feb 2015, 12:43 PM
#2
Posts: 1042
A "they're fine" option would be nice.
Although, I did vote OKW kappa.
Although, I did vote OKW kappa.
27 Feb 2015, 12:44 PM
#3
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
This poll makes no sense, because its not that simple.
All armies need changes and its not always nerfs.
All armies need changes and its not always nerfs.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
27 Feb 2015, 12:45 PM
#4
Posts: 137
A "they're fine" option would be nice.
Although, I did vote OKW kappa.
Yes...sorry, I forgott to put that option.
27 Feb 2015, 12:47 PM
#5
Posts: 137
This poll makes no sense, because its not that simple.
All armies need changes and its not always nerfs.
Yes. I know, but i made this poll to see which factions needs more attention.
27 Feb 2015, 12:49 PM
#6
Posts: 531
this'l just see which faction has the most fanboys
USF nerf = OH fanboys
soviet nerf = OKW fanboys
OKW nerf = US fanboys
OH nerf = soviet
USF nerf = OH fanboys
soviet nerf = OKW fanboys
OKW nerf = US fanboys
OH nerf = soviet
27 Feb 2015, 12:50 PM
#7
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Someone wants to nerf OST, really? 
27 Feb 2015, 12:51 PM
#8
Posts: 137
this'l just see which faction has the most fanboys
USF nerf = OH fanboys
soviet nerf = OKW fanboys
OKW nerf = US fanboys
OH nerf = soviet
That will be cool too.
27 Feb 2015, 12:51 PM
#9
Posts: 137
Someone wants to nerf OST, really?
It seems so
))
27 Feb 2015, 12:54 PM
#10
Posts: 1217
WFA (USF and OKW) are totally out of proportion and rewarding dull gameplay.
27 Feb 2015, 12:54 PM
#11
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
OKW and USF ??? Are you people crazy? What's wrong with USF besides that it's more powerfull than Ostheer which means Ostheer needs buff but not USF nerfs?
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
27 Feb 2015, 12:54 PM
#12
Posts: 471
This poll makes no sense, because its not that simple.
All armies need changes and its not always nerfs.
Is the right answer. /Close thread
27 Feb 2015, 12:57 PM
#13
Posts: 1217
OKW and USF ??? Are you people crazy?I suggest you play Ostheer versus them. Early game disadvantage to Rifles, late game disadvantage to Jacksons and P47s.
27 Feb 2015, 12:58 PM
#14
3 
Posts: 658
No offense but the question is stupid. No faction needs to be nerfed.
OKW needs a design overhaul, no straight nerfs for specific units.
USF are fine, so are Soviets. Wehrmacht only struggles ATM because of overpriced teching.
Fix teching for vanilla factions, re-design OKW, fix the call-in meta and then relic can look for OP/UP units and change what needs to be changed.
OKW needs a design overhaul, no straight nerfs for specific units.
USF are fine, so are Soviets. Wehrmacht only struggles ATM because of overpriced teching.
Fix teching for vanilla factions, re-design OKW, fix the call-in meta and then relic can look for OP/UP units and change what needs to be changed.
27 Feb 2015, 13:01 PM
#15
Posts: 137
Is the right answer. /Close thread
I close the thread when i want. Capisci?
27 Feb 2015, 13:01 PM
#16
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
I suggest you play Ostheer versus them. Early game disadvantage to Rifles, late game disadvantage to Jacksons and P47s.
Yes but that means that Ostheer is crippled right now, not USF broken.
For ostheer teching is to expensive and its vehicles cost to much fuel. In addition, Mg42 could perform better. That may be the root of the problem.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
27 Feb 2015, 13:06 PM
#17
Posts: 1042
I think with regard to OH you'd be looking at buffing their early units (MG42 seems formost on our mind, Pgrens could do with a buff, though preferably not to where they were when the game released) whilst toning down some of their late game units a tad IMO
27 Feb 2015, 13:07 PM
#18
Posts: 137
No offense but the question is stupid. No faction needs to be nerfed.
OKW needs a design overhaul, no straight nerfs for specific units.
USF are fine, so are Soviets. Wehrmacht only struggles ATM because of overpriced teching.
Fix teching for vanilla factions, re-design OKW, fix the call-in meta and then relic can look for OP/UP units and change what needs to be changed.
Can u use another word beside "stupid" ? Why you people are so rude? Can u talk like a normal person without offend? Thx...
27 Feb 2015, 13:14 PM
#19
Posts: 1217
I think with regard to OH you'd be looking at buffing their early units (MG42 seems formost on our mind, Pgrens could do with a buff, though preferably not to where they were when the game released) whilst toning down some of their late game units a tad IMOI agree on the Mg42 being too weak. PGs could maybe do with a slight reinforcement cost decrease. I wouldn´t touch their performance.
I disagree on the late game nerfs for Ost. What exactly is too strong? Throughout the game Ost got multiple nerfs to its lategame. Panthers proofed poor before their frontal armor was buffed. The Elefant is highly situational and imo also performing poorly with its range nerf to 70. The Tiger has received a pretty significant health nerf and goes down fast. The only thing that´s overpowered in Ost lategame is the Tiger Ace.
Yes but that means that Ostheer is crippled right now, not USF broken.I know what you mean. But currently their gameplay revolves around blobbing also. Additionally the concept of a mobile, 60 range, 240 dmg tank destroyer is broken though imo.
For ostheer teching is to expensive and its vehicles cost to much fuel. In addition, Mg42 could perform better. That may be the root of the problem.
27 Feb 2015, 13:18 PM
#20
Posts: 130
OKW is fine, have they most expensive tanks, the most expensive artillery and don't have early panzerfaust, 66% fuel and 80% ammo can't reinforce points so why need to be nerfed? 
EZPZLMNSQZ 
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1259
Board Info
626 users are online:
626 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
25 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
25 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49851
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Eovaldis
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM