Posts: 219
lol fuck you buddy
i only play 1v1s. check my playcard champ
and i was playing soviets, i had map control the entire game. then OKW puts up his flak halftrack and slows the game down completely. spams redicious call-in infantry and gets them all vet 5 because large squadsize soviet units. then he caps the entire map and spams panthers.
would you like a replay, mate?
 | Playercard of Ace of Swords | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
Also the B4 does 1440 damage )
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Vet 0 damage - 640, vet damage 3 - 960.
For mother russia doesn't increases damage, also it affects only infatry and support teams, not artillery.
Any proofs?
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I wonder who the hell decided to give OKW no at but Shreks and a resource penalty making vehicle based AT impractical
Why do you think the icon buff appears above the gun dude? Cruzz himself has said For Mother Russia effects the B4, as it is a support weapon (all artillery weapons are support weapons). And For Mother Russia gives you 50% more damage.
Guess how much damage you do if you have For Mother Russia, Vet 3, and Mark Target on a tank
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
No AT? 2x raketen in building can do wonders. I ve killed countless Shermans/AA trucks because of double raketen in building.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Yeah there is a whole lot of buildings for me to put Puppchens in when 120 mortars either destroyed them all or I'm on a open field based map. I have used trenches in conjunction with Puppchens before, but ultimately shreks are far more efficient.
But in almost every situation the puppchen is garbage, good pen, but shit accuracy and shit ROF. And when dealing with fast high damage medium armor both those things are a death sentence.
Give OKW more AT options and reduce the fuel cost on OKW vehicles but increase the MP cost and you will see less volk/shrek spam.
That's why you don't spam the recon plane, not to mention Precision strike and FMR is 190 munitions, but allows you to 1 shot any tank in the game with out any warning to that player. That's pretty fucking powerful.
Also don't build your B4's back inside your base and you won't need to use precision strike barely at all.
You want Panther to come out in 9-10min in team games and 11min in 1v1? Really? Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
120? Yes, because 120mm is not doctrinal and you see this every game.
Reduce fuel and increase MP?
About mark target from previus post:
Markt Target? Really? It's like warning "Move your damn tank because strike is coming".
In team games I shout by TS on my teammates so they won't mark it when Im shooting
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Guess how much damage you do if you have For Mother Russia, Vet 3, and Mark Target on a tank
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I never said you should always mark it, just that it already increases the huge damage to FUCK YOU amounts.
And dude what the hell do you want? Less shrek spam but want to keep OKW with out AT options? If you make the OKW Vehicles cost less fuel and more MP people won't have to be as choosy and it will help get rid of the OKW MP float.
It solves every problem you have with the faction, it reduces blobbing will increasing the amount of viable things OKW players can make so you see more variety and less Panthers.
And like I said, you don't need to spam recon. Just use infantry to scout or a sniper flare which OKW can't shoot down.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
How 9min(team) and 11min (1v1) Panther can solve any problems? It will give you option to blob Volks+Obers or just take Panther faster than Sherman.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
You are talking under ultra optimal circumstances involving the OKW player spending zero fuel at their first HQ, plus having dominant map control.
A increase in the amount of MP OKW vehicles cost would mean once you make them your MP income is reduced which means you couldn't spam them either. So it kills two birds with one stone. It allows OKW players to actually build light vehicles and cool units like the Sturmtiger, while limiting blobbing and spam.
And it feels like you haven't even played OKW, because a Panther isn't going to do shit for nothing against a player with AT guns.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
What if I told you that OKW player spends 0 fuel on the first truck, because they start with the fuel for it?
Your ideas are bad and you should feel bad when people with actual clue speak against them together with explanation.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
You know what Panther is doing? Defending you blob from Shermans. Panther behind the blob is a killer.
At Guns? You mean 57mm for example? Because ot has 40% chances to penetrate and vs vetted Panther 35%. You need a way more than 2 of them to scary Panther.
And it does not fix anything. It would be huge buff for OKW since OKW is floating MP, struggling with fuel and you want to decrease fuel cost (negating lower fuel income) and put this cost into MP which OKW has a lot all the time. 8 min Jadgpanzer in 1v1 would be real, 10min Panther, 4min Puma and on and on..
Posts: 1484
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 556
2 
Posts: 1108
How 9min(team) and 11min (1v1) Panther can solve any problems? It will give you option to blob Volks+Obers or just take Panther faster than Sherman.
| Playercard of MoerserKarL | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
dude I've in 2vs2's, never seen a panther in 10-12 minutes.
Posts: 440
Relic should never released OPKW or USF but as stand alone game, COH2 was almost perfectly balanced before this.
 |
|
|
57 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
65 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
