okwunits

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 14:03 PMspam.r33k

http://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197968413717

is that your card? if so try harder next time

not a single 1v1 in a game, which, according to it devs, is focused on 1v1 balance. 1 game as soviet none as ost. so what do you know about balance?


Edit:
to clarify: i do not agree with what alex says. i just dont like your hypocrisy

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 19:42 PMOZtheWiZARD

There is no discussion with you. You ignore facts and statistics and seems to be completely focused on your own perception of the balance that has nothing to do with the actual state.


Other thing is how easy is now to dominate as OKW in team games resulting in ladder being a bit inflated right now.

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 20:13 PMWingZero

But Alex majority of your post that I have seen so far defends Axis units. I think its fair to assume you are bit biased based on your player card with Axis only games.

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 18:15 PMSpecialka

At least, I reach Top 100 with USF where you can't even in 3v3 Axis At team .

Deal with it.

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 22:08 PMAlexzandvar

A person's rank/elo has nothing to do with the validity of their argument.

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 22:34 PMKatitof

No.

But denying long proven facts and zealously defending every single OP unit just because it is in the faction you play most, arguing that perfectly fine if not overperforming units have no place or are too weak or don't scale good despite having THE best scaling in the whole game has.

No one takes you seriously anymore, because vast majority of your posts read like they were ripped from another dimension or fairy tale.

If you were slightly more aggressive then you'd be crowned as worthy successor of vetlolcake and worthy of sitting between sierra and jaigen.

Fun fact:
Every single post WFA balance problem, excluding the ones with Ostheer had root at OKW.

Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 00:31 AMAchtAchter

Guys whas all with the playercard bashing? He has games from both sides while most people criticising him are allies only players,that hide their playercard.

What Alexander says makes sense if you base it on team games. Puma is a beast in 1vs1 but a questionable choice in team games,e.g. Some okw units like the jgpz4 or uhu shine on certain maps and situations but can't be always considered a good choice.

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 20:02 PMAlexzandvar

You haven't posted a single argument against anything I have said, and continue to resort to personal attacks. "L2P" is not a valid argument.

Jump back to quoted post11 Feb 2015, 23:00 PMAlexzandvar

Please bring up some examples,

Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 05:47 AMOZtheWiZARD

I beg to differ. Beside it is hard to argue with the nonsense you were writing in different topic.

You said Obers its self are a "fine unit" saying that the lmg34 only makes them op

Then i had to tell you u cant separate the weapon that Obers deploy with

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 22:47 PMAlexzandvar

Why, take away the LMG34 and Ober's are pretty mediocre.

Jump back to quoted post12 Feb 2015, 07:53 AMAlexzandvar

Again, you fail to actually provide anything concrete. And it's not hard to argue at all, you simply just don't want to put in either the effort or don't actually have anything to say.



You obviously lack reading comprehension because I said "Obers would be perfectly fine if they didn't have the MG34", which is correct. With out the MG34 Obers are just a all round good infantry rifle unit.