GPU update - R9 270X with 2GB or 4GB VRAM
Posts: 246
I am planning a CPU+GPU update from my Phenom II X4 645 & HD6850 to some i5 4xxx and a R9 270X (the Sapphire Dual-X as they seem to be quite quiet ). I noticed that there is also a version with 4GB VRAM instead of 2GB. Normally I'd say that 2GB fits the perfomance of this card better and from what I've seen in the past ~15 years, buying more VRAM for a middle class GPU does not pay off, but has anyone of you any real experience with CoH2's VRAM hunger? (we all know how badly optimized this game is) Maybe this game is one exception where the extra VRAM does pay off?
Maybe anyone here has some experience with 4GB he might want to share? (I've read Cyanara's guide, but it is not enough for this decision )
Thanks in advance!
edit:
- The prices in my country are ~170 / 200 bucks.
- My screen resolution is 1680*1050.
- The only other "HW-intense" games I play: BF3/4
Posts: 94
Hope this helps
Posts: 324 | Subs: 2
There are however quite a few games that eat VRam for breakfast no matter the resolution (Shadows of mordor, Dying light, Ubisoft games) partly because they're unoptimized console ports (new consoles have unified memory, which doesn't translate all to well to PC in some cases), so keep that in mind.
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Posts: 110
Posts: 276
In short: bigger is always better.
In my 25 years experience with building my own and friends/families computers, not even 1 person cried about having too much vram or ram.
Posts: 341
I'm running 2xR9 290X 8GB VAPOR-X cards at 7680x1600 When it comes to RAM and VRAM always use the condom theory, better to have one and not need it than need it and not have one!
Posts: 322
If you want to go cheap then get the cheapest 270x.
Posts: 246
It's not a sweet spot. If you don't mind spending more then get a gtx960 - a bit better in Coh2 and a lot better in many other games.
If you want to go cheap then get the cheapest 270x.
I just took a quick glance at the GTX 960 before and quickly decided it was beyond what I was willing to spend for a 2GB card. But I took a closer look and wow, the energy efficiency of that thing is amazing which leads to fantastic noise levels! Maybe I spend the 30 extra Euros for completely silent card in desktop mode and almost inaudible card at load (my PC is built to be quiet, so this would probably fit even better than the 270X)
Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
I just took a quick glance at the GTX 960 before and quickly decided it was beyond what I was willing to spend for a 2GB card. But I took a closer look and wow, the energy efficiency of that thing is amazing which leads to fantastic noise levels! Maybe I spend the 30 extra Euros for completely silent card in desktop mode and almost inaudible card at load (my PC is built to be quiet, so this would probably fit even better than the 270X)
that is not entirely true! yes, the gtx 960 has a good efficiency, but if you buy a good custom amd, they are very quiet aswell. imo nvidia means less bang for your buck.
i would rather buy a r9 280, it has 3 gigs ram and is faster than the 960. if you buy a good custom one, it should be the price range of a gtx 960, at least here in germany.
Posts: 341
R9290x>R9290>R9280x>R9280>R9270x>GTX960>GTX770>GTX760>R9270
This is consistent over most titles besides the few that favour Nvidia heavily and even then it only changes to.
R9290x>R9290>R9280x>GTX960>R9280>GTX770>R9270x>GTX760>R9270
As for sound levels the 960 is barely ahead at roughly between 33-38db under load compared to R9280 35-40db under load, Though Sapphire's Vapor-X cards smash thru with some 280X and 290x models being able to achieve less than 30db under load. R9290and 290X models beat the 960 hands down. Only one thing changes this...EVGA GTX 960 SSC. I have two of these puppies on my work computer, these bad boys wont even turn on their fans until you hit temps above 50 odd degrees celsuis, quietest PC in the shop, besides the bosses.
The 960's best asset is power consumption, being significantly less than its AMD counterparts.
The biggest factor here is that you'll get better performance from an AMD card for the price you pay than you will paying the same price for a Nvidia card. Not to mention AMD is soon to release their 300 series soon meaning even more price drops for cheaper AMD cards.
Posts: 16
btw,2gb is enough for 1050p
Posts: 322
Also take note that Mirage is ranking price/performance, not raw performance.
Does depend where you live though - where I am the 960 is cheap right now but the 280 costs a lot more
Sorry for offtopic
Posts: 830 | Subs: 2
Nvidia because of many update, better quality Kappa
Posts: 341
Does depend where you live though - where I am the 960 is cheap right now but the 280 costs a lot more
Really??? what prices if I may ask?
Posts: 322
Posts: 341
Posts: 246
270 ~140
270X ~160
280 ~185
280X ~210
960 ~190
The 270X I'm interested in is ~170, the 960 ~200, so you get roughly the same bang for the buck.
Posts: 341
As it's not much difference in price for a better card just go with the best you can afford. I strongly recommend staying clear of the 960 its barely better than a 760.
To help you out a little more take a gander at this http://www.futuremark.com/hardware/gpu
NOTE: 960 does not appear on this list, some sort of clue
Posts: 246
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Gigabyte/GTX_960_G1_Gaming/28.html
Btw, that is the GTX I'm glancing at
With the prices here in Germany, the price-performance-ratio is roughly the same for 270's/280's and the 960.
edit: Dammit, the 960 was not listed correctly in idealo.de, it is definitely a worse price-perfomance-ratio (fps) at least for this model.
Livestreams
1 | |||||
861 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger