New faction British??

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 09:29 AMJohnnyB

Japanese tanks were shittiest ever, more shitty than shermans and every tank from WW2 you can imagine (except maybe from german satelites country's tanks). So it will be verry hard to fit japanese faction into a game were tanks are so important. More than this, Japan didn't have effective AT infantry. They were good at planes, ships, artilery. That's all. They would fit into a scenary that would involve alot of water. Like battles for islands and peninsulas.

And no, COH2 doesn't need more factions.

When COH3 will be issued, they can focus on Pacific war. That's were they fit best. But tbh, I would like COH3 to be focused on Afrika. Afrikakorps, italians, british and americans. That's a theater where 4 factions would go verry well both from balance and historycal point of view.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 09:39 AMCrecer13

what do you want more? Britons and fifth Germans fraction.
Come on. Besides Japan there are no alternatives.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 09:50 AMGrenadierIT19

Yep, because Italy is the same as Germany ... Seriously?

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 09:30 AMExardus

Americans and Soviet playing together in City 17 or Kholodni ferma come on. They will kill each other

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 10:58 AMEsxile

British and Afrika Corps can join the game under one or many commanders with their dedicated units. There is no need to add 2 new specific faction in game.

And for Japan, that's sound too alien to me. Pacific theater is more adequate for a naval strategic game than field one.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 12:41 PMdrChengele

In my opinion Brits did not clash with Japanese enough in the Asian theatre to merit an entire expansion around this scenario.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 12:41 PMdrChengele

From what we see, Brits are in, so the other faction, if any, will be something Brits fought. In my opinion Brits did not clash with Japanese enough in the Asian theatre to merit an entire expansion around this scenario.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 13:19 PMJames Hale

You are entitled to your opinion, but in this instance it does correlate with History.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 12:41 PMdrChengele

People are right, if you can include Italians, then faction-design-wise, you can include the Japanese.

Multiplayer skirmishes are not meant to reflect historical scenarios, they tossed that out the window the moment they decided it's ok to have Americans in Kholodny Ferma or Soviets in France. A decision I fully agree with, by the way.

Still, not gonna happen. The two new introduced factions will most probably be thematically appropriate to one another. From what we see, Brits are in, so the other faction, if any, will be something Brits fought. In my opinion Brits did not clash with Japanese enough in the Asian theatre to merit an entire expansion around this scenario.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 13:35 PMnigo

the japanese LOBBY reached coh2.org.


sad day

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 13:15 PMdasheepeh

we need the 4 factions to be balanced first. 6 factions is going to be a whole another story..

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 10:12 AMAustralian Magic

Don't act like you were stupid.

It's Europe and they both were fighting agasint nazi.

Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2015, 14:29 PMdrChengele

Yeah, the game can be ultra-balanced tomorrow. And then 2 new factions will completely piss on that balance anyway.

In short, MOAR FACTIONS. Game will never be balanced, at least give us more stuff to have in-game diversity .