Login

russian armor

That Feeling When......

15 Jan 2015, 09:32 AM
#61
avatar of Mirage357

Posts: 341

...your mate talks up his new opening strat then you vs. him and he gets walked on. :gimpy:

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jan 2015, 09:16 AMCruzz

When your own mortar sinks your own tank on ice :foreveralone:


:rofl: I have to assume this has happened to you personally.
15 Jan 2015, 10:58 AM
#62
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jan 2015, 09:16 AMCruzz


They say it in response to oorah, because of what it is classified in the game files.


Actual gaming experience tells me that they say it in response to Rear Echelon's "Volley" ability.
15 Jan 2015, 14:12 PM
#63
avatar of VonIvan

Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21

When you realize not going meta really reeaaaally hurts. :foreveralone:
15 Jan 2015, 14:52 PM
#64
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1

When Relic releases a new patch :megusta:
15 Jan 2015, 15:26 PM
#65
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

When M-42 is more useful against infantry then armor...
15 Jan 2015, 15:39 PM
#66
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

When your critically-damaged ISU is finished off by a Luchs.
15 Jan 2015, 16:09 PM
#67
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jan 2015, 15:26 PMKatitof
When M-42 is more useful against infantry then armor...


That is actually quite accurate historicaly (yay Relic?)

From interview with Khrapov Ivan Vasilyevitch (Храпов Иван Васильевич), Soviet sergeant, artilleryman, commander of M-42 crew

- How would you describe the effect of fragmentation shells of 45-mm cannon?

- Weight of fragmentation shell was more than two kilogramms. Imagine what it's like inside stuffed with TNT. Distance travelled by fragments is much greater than that of a hand grenade. They were especially effective against enemy machine-gun points. In principle, the main advantage of the 45-mm gun was that it shoots like a sniper rifle - very accurately. No deviations, because you shoot direct fire. If it is good to aim, then fire a single shot was enough for the destruction of enemy machine guns teams, which consisted of two or three people. There was also a buckshot, which we initially issued. But it somehow did not take, because it had shot distance of only 200 meters. This is useful when the enemy approaches very close, but such situations did not happen, so we refused to use buckshot at all.

- You were used mainly to suppress the enemy machine-gun points?

- Basically, yes. In battle we shot machine-gun and mortar points all the time.



Full interview in original (russian) [url=http://iremember.ru/memoirs/artilleristi/khrapov-ivan-vasilevich/?sphrase_id=842]http://iremember.ru/memoirs/artilleristi/khrapov-ivan-vasilevich/?sphrase_id=842
15 Jan 2015, 17:09 PM
#68
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

M42 spam new meta.
15 Jan 2015, 17:50 PM
#69
avatar of Theodosios
Admin Red  Badge

Posts: 1554 | Subs: 7

...when you as 1v1/2v2 player join the 3v3/4v4 business and notice how bad your even high ranked opponents are. :snfBarton:
15 Jan 2015, 18:06 PM
#70
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



That is actually quite accurate historicaly (yay Relic?)

From interview with Khrapov Ivan Vasilyevitch (Храпов Иван Васильевич), Soviet sergeant, artilleryman, commander of M-42 crew

- How would you describe the effect of fragmentation shells of 45-mm cannon?

- Weight of fragmentation shell was more than two kilogramms. Imagine what it's like inside stuffed with TNT. Distance travelled by fragments is much greater than that of a hand grenade. They were especially effective against enemy machine-gun points. In principle, the main advantage of the 45-mm gun was that it shoots like a sniper rifle - very accurately. No deviations, because you shoot direct fire. If it is good to aim, then fire a single shot was enough for the destruction of enemy machine guns teams, which consisted of two or three people. There was also a buckshot, which we initially issued. But it somehow did not take, because it had shot distance of only 200 meters. This is useful when the enemy approaches very close, but such situations did not happen, so we refused to use buckshot at all.

- You were used mainly to suppress the enemy machine-gun points?

- Basically, yes. In battle we shot machine-gun and mortar points all the time.



Full interview in original (russian) [url=http://iremember.ru/memoirs/artilleristi/khrapov-ivan-vasilevich/?sphrase_id=842]http://iremember.ru/memoirs/artilleristi/khrapov-ivan-vasilevich/?sphrase_id=842


Now you made me dream about shell change akin to ISU/sherman one where we'd have AT shells and AI shells. Damn, then this AT gun would be truly unique and actually useful if it was more effective against inf in some way.
15 Jan 2015, 18:43 PM
#71
avatar of JHeartless

Posts: 1637

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jan 2015, 18:06 PMKatitof


Now you made me dream about shell change akin to ISU/sherman one where we'd have AT shells and AI shells. Damn, then this AT gun would be truly unique and actually useful if it was more effective against inf in some way.


Can you say M42 Canister shot? :wub:
15 Jan 2015, 20:02 PM
#72
avatar of somenbjorn

Posts: 923

Yeah the M-42 was very accurate, it had a 4x scope if Im not mistaken. What they would do against later war tanks was to conceal themselves, something that is quite easy with the small M-42.
Wait till the enemy tanks are close enough and then fire at the tracks. Being accurate they would knock the threads of, causing the enemy tank swing around and show it's weaker side armour.
And that ofc could be punched through.
15 Jan 2015, 20:06 PM
#73
avatar of CasTroy

Posts: 559

That feeling...when I have to face a variety number of balance threads on this site lately where not even one single participant is giving constructive criticism but insulting its opponents. :(
15 Jan 2015, 21:35 PM
#74
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

That feeling when your sniper gets killed by a CE at max range :P
15 Jan 2015, 23:19 PM
#75
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post15 Jan 2015, 18:06 PMKatitof


Now you made me dream about shell change akin to ISU/sherman one where we'd have AT shells and AI shells. Damn, then this AT gun would be truly unique and actually useful if it was more effective against inf in some way.

Something like Stug E gun, but with more accuracy and much lesser AoE, because otherwise it will wipe ostheer 4-man squads. Yeah, M-42 would be unique and useful.
16 Jan 2015, 00:21 AM
#76
avatar of herrtin

Posts: 64

When IS2 deflects 5 shots in a row :D
16 Jan 2015, 02:19 AM
#77
avatar of DakkaIsMagic

Posts: 403

When that King Tiger one shots your three star con/Penal/Irrg/Guard/Rifleman/CE/Major/LT/Capt/Airborne Squad.
16 Jan 2015, 02:35 AM
#78
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959

when your damaged IS2/ISU goes down with the walking stuka's barrage.
28 Jan 2015, 21:48 PM
#79
avatar of Imagelessbean

Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1

Your ally in 4v4 is afk so one person quits but you remember you are playing as German so you cannot really lose.

http://www.coh2.org/replay/30173/germans-are-the-best
28 Jan 2015, 22:11 PM
#80
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

When I suck but I blame my teammate.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

821 users are online: 821 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM