Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Moreover, we already got leaks that wehr might get FHQ with retreat point, so that leaves only soviets without one in the future.
14 
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
OKW truck was never portable, instead, they were designed in an even more stupid way.
The trucks need to setup a chain with adjacent strategy points from the HQ, all points generate 66% less than other army, only the chained point give full resources, if the chain is broken or not even chained at all, the deployed points don't generate full resources, this stupidity of design making OKW NEVER able to get "normal" fuel or muni income even in small map like South Langres (but North Langres was fine, making this flaw even more obviously retarded), because the points are 3 points away from HQ.
Of course, unlike the Brits, the truck can't prevent the points being captured, but if it is captured, the truck became useless.
I really doubted my fellow alpha testers really care about the game, 95% of them just messing around in 4v4, and doesn't give a shit to this obvious flaw, some even think there is nothing wrong with this. I complained a lot yet Relic don't give a shit until the very end of alpha.
And the last patch overbuffing the trucks to high speed, heavy crush, high armour unit which able to squad wipe the first Rifles in the first minute, and even bring it to the first release.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Why not buff the mighty squad merge? I use it a lot as soviets and I think people forget it exists. I always have a cons squad just to reinforce my support units.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 2561
Posts: 249
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
8 Posts: 2470
i also think reinforce mechanic can use true sight mechanic.
for example an ambulance is behind a thick hedgerow. the rifleman shuld not be able to reinforce on the opposite side of the hedge... in my humble opinion.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
That... doesn't make any sense what so ever and definitely does not address what was said before.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
4 Posts: 951
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Forward retreat point for everyone or for no oneI choose that no one gets it.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I choose that no one gets it.
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
I know. I choose the former because like OP said, forward retreat point is causing the constant action and massive micro to avoid nades etc instead of preparing flanks and defenses.
I was little confused myself in fact ^^
Point is, OKW and USF should not have forward retreat point if Soviets and Ostheer don't have.
Second option is to give Soviets and Ostheer such point with ability to reinforce and heal troops.
1 
Posts: 2885
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Forward retreat point for everyone or for no one
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Not only is it unfair to other factions but it downgrades the gameplay experience. Giving it to everyone would just create even more lame matchups.
4 Posts: 951
Posts: 353
Posts: 135
 |
|
|
334 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
