Tournament Statistics! (and no pretty graphs DEAL WITH IT)
Posts: 203 | Subs: 2
Here is how the data is broken down, I will take a look at each round and look at its corresponding statistics. I ignored round 1 because, well, mirror matches don't really tell much.
As the rounds go up, more descriptive information would be given. What does more descriptive information entail? Commander choice, map choice (for rounds applicable), first 5 units, how close/far a victor it was, tech path, how long the game was, and etc. (I'm open to suggestions here, but be mindful, I have to sit though these games. :C)
LIMITATIONS OF THE DAMN STATISTICS
There are many limitations of the statistics I have presented. First off, the sample size becomes increasingly small as the rounds go up, in terms of games as well as players. This means that the statistics reflect those players that remain. Whether or not you can justify saying that a particular player exemplifies a faction is up to you. I have also assumed that commander choice influences your teching structure. This is not always true. I did this out of simplicity.
Anyways, without further ado, here is the statistics (barring missing information):
MAP WIN RATES!
Win Percentages
Faymonville: Played 36 times
OKW: 47.2%
OST: 18.2%
SOV: 40.7%
USF: 66.6%
Ferma: Played 64 times
OKW: 53.3%
OST: 31.6%
SOV: 54.5%
USF: 50%
Langres: Played 19 times
OKW: 60%
OST: 25%
SOV: 46.2%
USF: 50%
Semois: Played 17 times
OKW: 7.7%
OST: 25%
SOV: 90%
USF: 85.7%
Tournament-Wide Stats
Games Recorded: 272
Win Percentages
OKW: 52%
OST: 26.3%
SOV: 53.2%
USF: 59.5%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 72.1%
OST: 27.9%
SOV: 69.1%
USF: 30.9%
Win Against Percentages
OKW Won 51 times!
Against SOV: 68.6%
Against USF: 34%
OST Won 10 times!
Against SOV: 90%
Against USF: 10%
SOV Won 50 times!
Against OKW: 62%
Against OST: 38%
USF Won 25 times!
Against OKW: 64%
Against OST: 26%
Commander Chosen (only R3 and up)
OKW: Chosen 59 times!
Breakthrough: 5.1%
Fortifications: 50.8%
Luftwaffe: 23.7%
No Commander: 3.4%
Scavenge: 11.9%
Special Ops: 5.1%
OST: Chosen 19 times!
Assault Support: 5.3%
Close Air Support: 5.3%
Festung Armor: 5.3%
Jaegar Infantry: 5.3%
Mechanized Assault: 36.8%
Mobile Defense: 5.3%
No Commander: 15.9%
Ostruppen: 15.9%
Spearhead: 5.3%
SOV: Chosen 55 times!
Advanced Warfare: 1.8%
Armored Assault: 5.5%
Conscript Support: 1.8%
Counterattack: 7.3%
Guard Motor: 29.1%
Guard Rifle Combined: 1.8%
Mechanized Support: 5.5%
No Commander: 9.1%
Shock Motor Heavy: 1.8%
Shockrifle Frontline: 34.5%
Soviet Shock: 1.8%
USF: Chosen 23 times!
Airborne: 52.3%
Armor: 13%
Recon Support: 34.8%
Commander won (only R3 and up)
OKW: Chosen 59 times!
Breakthrough: 33.3%
Fortifications: 56.7%
Luftwaffe: 35.7%
No Commander: 0%
Scavenge: 85.7%
Special Ops: 33.3%
OST: Chosen 19 times!
Assault Support: 0%
Close Air Support: 0%
Festung Armor: 0%
Jaegar Infantry: 0%
Mechanized Assault: 42.9%
Mobile Defense: 0%
No Commander: 33.3%
Ostruppen: 0%
Spearhead: 0%
SOV: Chosen 55 times!
Advanced Warfare: 100%
Armored Assault: 0%
Conscript Support: 0%
Counterattack: 50%
Guard Motor: 56.3%
Guard Rifle Combined: 100%
Mechanized Support: 33.3%
No Commander: 40%
Shock Motor Heavy: 0%
Shockrifle Frontline: 68.4%
Soviet Shock: 0%
USF: Chosen 23 times!
Airborne: 66.7%
Armor: 33.3%
Recon Support: 75%
Length of Matches! (5 minute intervals)
Minimum: 5 minutes
Median: 25 minutes
Mean: 24.2 minutes
Maximum: 60 minutes
Round Specific Stats
Round 2
Games Recorded: 58
Missing: 4
No-shows: 2
Win Percentages
OKW: 53.8%
OST: 31.6%
SOV: 53.8%
USF: 52.6%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 67.2%
OST: 32.8%
SOV: 67.2%
USF: 32.8%
Round 3
Games Recorded: 33
Missing: 2
No-Show: 2
Win Percentages
OKW: 68.2%
OST: 18.2%
SOV: 71.4%
USF: 66.7%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 66.7%
OST: 33.3%
SOV: 72.7%
USF: 27.3%
Round 4
Games Recorded: 17
Missing: 0
Win Percentages
OKW: 61.5%
OST: 25%
SOV: 41.7%
USF: 60%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 76.5%
OST: 23.5%
SOV: 70.6%
USF: 29.4%
Round 5
Games Recorded: 11
Missing: 0
Win Percentages
OKW: 11.1%
OST: 0%
SOV: 100%
USF: 80%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 81.8%
OST: 18.2%
SOV: 54.5%
USF: 45.5%
Round 6
Games Recorded: 9
Missing: 0
Win Percentages
OKW: 55.6%
OST: n/a%
SOV: 42.9%
USF: 50%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 100%
OST: 0%
SOV: 77.7%
USF: 22.2%
Round 7
Games Recorded: 8
Missing: 0
Win Percentages
OKW: 16.7%
OST: 50%
SOV: 83.3%
USF: 50%
Percentage Chosen
OKW: 75%
OST: 25%
SOV: 75%
USF: 25%
PLAYERCARDS (for players in round 5 and up)!
Want to know the build orders for your favorite players? WE GOT EM NOW WOOOOOOO! (also errors inbound, will try to catch them)
Percentage Chosen
BartonPL: 3 games
Soviet: 33.3%
• Engineer, Engineer, Conscript, Conscript, Conscript: 100%
OKW: 66.7%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren: 100%
cruzz: 7 games
OST: 14.3%
• Gren, Gren, Gren, Gren, Mortar: 100%
OKW: 28.6%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Flak Halftrack: 50%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, MG34: 50%
USF: 28.6%
• RE, Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, M20: 50%
• RE, Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, Rifle: 50%
SOV: 28.6%
• Conscript, CE, Conscript, Maxim, Maxim: 50%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, CE: 50%
Jesulin: 7 games
OKW: 42.9%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, JLI: 33.3%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, MG34: 66.6%
Soviet: 66.7%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, Mortar: 25%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, CE, M3: 25%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, M3, Guards: 25%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, M3, Shocks: 25%
Luvnest: 8 games
OKW: 37.5%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Puma, Pfusiliers: 33.3%
• Volksgren, Kubel, Volksgren, Volksgren, JLI: 33.3%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Puma: 33.3%
SOV: 62.5%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, CE: 100%
OMGPOP: 7 games
OKW: 54.1%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Puma: 25%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, MG34, MG34: 25%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Flak Halftrack: 50%
USF: 42.9%
• Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, M20, Rifle: 33.3%
• Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, M20, 50 Cal: 33.3%
• Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, 50 Cal: 33.3%
Simon: 2 games
OKW: 50%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Raketen: 100%
USF: 50%
• Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, M20, Ambulance: 100%
Symbiosis: 3 games
OKW: 66.7%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, MG34, MG34: 100%
USF: 33.3%
• Rifle, Rifle, Rifle, M20, 50 Cal: 100%
VindicareX: 3 games
OST: 33.3%
• Gren, Gren, Gren, MG42, MG42: 100%
SOV: 33.3%
• Conscript, Conscript, Conscript, CE, M3: 100%
OKW: 33.3%
• Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgren, Volksgrens, MG34: 100%
Here is the link to the spreadsheet, I might update it: https://www.dropbox.com/s/stxemc05dw0en1r/coh2.org%201v1.xlsx?dl=0
Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Looking forward to the data, there's no way I'd be able to accomplish something like this without tearing my hair out.
Posts: 203 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4
Permanently BannedPosts: 203 | Subs: 2
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
There is almost nothing you have highlighted, which conflicts with my own predictions.
viz
SU: Shock Frontline Tactics
Ost: Mechanised Assault
OKW: Fortification
USF: A/B
But I do not understand the fascination with OKW Fortification? Lazy turtling?
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
But I do not understand the fascination with OKW Fortification? Lazy turtling?
MG34 is OP as fuck. OKW tends to have a huge manpower surplus at times which can easily be put into an Pak43, skipping the need to invest anything into raketens. Smines are great against certain strats. And that's really all you need, bunkers and zeroing have no real reason to exist for OKW.
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
MG34 is OP as fuck. OKW tends to have a huge manpower surplus at times which can easily be put into an Pak43, skipping the need to invest anything into raketens. Smines are great against certain strats. And that's really all you need, bunkers and zeroing have no real reason to exist for OKW.
Thnx.
And BTW, a huge shout out to you and Jeez for those games we watched this evening
Posts: 4
Posts: 203 | Subs: 2
I don't get why ostheer is so underrepresented in this tournament, do the OKW really outclass them that much?
Ostheer just has an incredibly hard time against usf. Against soviets, they don't hold MUCH of an advantage against soviets either.
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
I don't get why ostheer is so underrepresented in this tournament, do the OKW really outclass them that much?
Things Ostheer does better:
Minesweeping (but on the other hand OKW has so much manpower and large squads that they don't even need to sweep...)
Non-fuel artillery (largely meaningless in 1vs1 outside of Semois, on which I'd say Ostheer is actually a superior choice to OKW)
Munition based artillery (useful against B4...and that's about it)
Vehicle snares (largely meaningless when you don't get the ubiquitous shrekblobs of OKW)
Long term vehicle production (no fuel penalty but huge tech costs compared to OKW)
Things OKW does better:
Everything else
Ostheer has a rather weak earlygame especially against USF. Their advantages over OKW are not particularly useful for 1vs1.
Posts: 186
OST underpowered for 1v1, Allies losing due to being played by the wrong hands.
Posts: 117
Posts: 203 | Subs: 2
Posts: 764
Posts: 24
Man OST is performing badly... and is under-represented!
The win percentages are much cloer than the cries of "nerf OKW" would suggest. Also in round for when the "better" players are playing OKW looks to be massively outclassed by USF and Soviets.
So this does lend support to the fact that balance is really only an issue at the higher levels. So when these top players start claiming balance is askew then it is worth listening to otherwise the rest of us mere mortals just need to l2p.
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
As for Ostheer underperforming, it isn't a huge surprise. The early game strength of the faction has been slowly gutted over the course of CoH 2 with nerfs to the HMG42, LMGs, FHT, tech timing, PaK 40, Pgrens etc etc. The usual justification for this was that late game Tigers/Panthers are super strong. Sadly, Ost T4 isn't feasible in a close game. Ost T3 flounders against Soviet call-ins and USF in general leaving the only option for Ostheer as Tigers. Properly managed T34/85s deal with Tigers without much trouble as long as Mark Target is available. And the new Is-2 can pretty much go head to head with a Tiger and come out on top. PaK40s are still amazing but when a faction is crutching on one late game heavy tank and their AT gun... things aren't looking good.
LMG Grens are still strong but they don't have the ability to hold the line like late game Volks with their insane Vet bonuses (plus the ease at which they get there with schrecks) and 5 man squads. Nor do LMG grens have the raw killing power of Obers. The MG34 fills the same role as the HMG42 but OKW has a better arsenal with which to support it.
Not to mention the fact that the Luchs is the perfect vehicle to tide an OKW player over before getting a Panther whereas investing into a P4 could potentially mean never Ostheer never making it to a Tiger. Plus the P4 is probably easier to kill than a Luchs with the combination of small target size, crazy killing potential, in-combat stealth and raw speed.
TLR - Ostheer is plagued with an overly expensive teching system if you go past anything but T2. Plus their base-line tanks cannot compete with Soviet call-ins or USF Major tanks. Tigers are strong but they come late (often too late against USF). Grens are too fragile and you don't have the luxury of mass amounts of schrecks everywhere to supplement your other AT. Soviet would suffer from the same problems as Ostheer regarding tech costs except they get phenomenal doctrinal choices like Shocks, 120mm mortars, Mark Target, T34/85s and 30 munition mines - oh and demo charges.
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
4 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, kubetstore
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM