What do you want in CoH2....
28 Nov 2014, 01:17 AM
#41
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Urban panzergrenadiers with double flamers and armor
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
28 Nov 2014, 02:23 AM
#42
5 
Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
An interesting, strategically diverse, and competitive meta. Oh, and bug fixes. Boring I know...I guess I should have said MOAR COMMANDERS!*!!*#@%)(*&@#%
Oh, and eliminate all of the "hybrid" maps. We need dedicated maps for each game mode.
Oh, and eliminate all of the "hybrid" maps. We need dedicated maps for each game mode.
28 Nov 2014, 03:13 AM
#43
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
_____________________________________________________________________________
28 Nov 2014, 03:21 AM
#44
Posts: 4928
Oh, and eliminate all of the "hybrid" maps. We need dedicated maps for each game mode.
Hybrid maps?
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
28 Nov 2014, 03:26 AM
#45
Posts: 543
Gib optimization
28 Nov 2014, 03:29 AM
#46
Posts: 1122
Commanders and death of call-in meta.
28 Nov 2014, 03:34 AM
#47
Posts: 1042
A decently made up Soviet faction. (see my Workers Militia faction for more on that...)
28 Nov 2014, 04:15 AM
#48
5 Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
Hybrid maps?
I'm referring to maps that are designed for a specific number of players like la gleize, lanzerath ambush, and ettlebruck (4v4) but are playable in other game modes as well (2v2, or 3v3) leaving, in the case of 3v3s, one player all on his own away from his team mates.
This is also a problem with maps like minsk being far to big for 1v1 (and extremely dull) and kharkov being to small for 2v2.
Maps like vaux farmlands and rails and metal that are specifically designed for 2v2s feel great, as there is enough room for players to maneuver and coordinate in a way that feels natural.
28 Nov 2014, 04:52 AM
#49
Posts: 431
The Japanese.
28 Nov 2014, 04:59 AM
#50
Posts: 4928
The Japanese.
Just play Soviets, build lots of mines, and never get anything larger than a T-70
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
> Kriegsbeute Doctrine|Partisan Rework|British Infantry Rework|Soviet Assault Squad <
28 Nov 2014, 07:32 AM
#51
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
1) "RECONNECT FUNCTION" please... pretty please... I BEG YOU.
2) UI improvements/mechanics:
-Control over garrisoned MGs (and Raketen).
-Manual reload for MGs.
-vehicle turret lock/prioritizing for every vehicle.
-HE/AT shells indicator.
-A lot more which can be found in forums.
3) Better vehicle pathing. Last night I lost a freaking KT just because the dump garden decided to rotate the whole vehicle with reverse gear.
4)Minor bug fixes (retreat bug, ghost howitzer bug etc) and better frame rate.
2) UI improvements/mechanics:
-Control over garrisoned MGs (and Raketen).
-Manual reload for MGs.
-vehicle turret lock/prioritizing for every vehicle.
-HE/AT shells indicator.
-A lot more which can be found in forums.
3) Better vehicle pathing. Last night I lost a freaking KT just because the dump garden decided to rotate the whole vehicle with reverse gear.
4)Minor bug fixes (retreat bug, ghost howitzer bug etc) and better frame rate.
28 Nov 2014, 07:36 AM
#52
Posts: 431
Just play Soviets, build lots of mines, and never get anything larger than a T-70
Pretty much. I think they'd be a really interesting team if done correctly. They'd focus largely on camo, ambush, first strike bonuses, and booby traps. I think it would be really cool. Plus, they'd be an Axis team without uber armor so that would be nice.
28 Nov 2014, 08:02 AM
#53
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
I would build a list with my wishes, but I will reduce it to one, which is the most important:
FIX GAME PERFORMANCE. It's laggy, runs like shit for to manny times. Do something about it and everybody will be happier.
FIX GAME PERFORMANCE. It's laggy, runs like shit for to manny times. Do something about it and everybody will be happier.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
28 Nov 2014, 08:03 AM
#54
Posts: 403
A decently made up Soviet faction. (see my Workers Militia faction for more on that...)
Major Conscript user.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
Sometimes NKVD Commander.
28 Nov 2014, 08:14 AM
#55
17 Posts: 2838 | Subs: 3
Random faction search for automatch.
28 Nov 2014, 08:49 AM
#56
10 Posts: 10
I would really like to see a North African theater of war. Africa Korps agains the desert rats !
Generally this is early in the war so nothing for the heavy tank fans. This would be a light amour war, but heavy artillery. I have seen pictures of Tigers in North African but as think they were quite rare.
You could have commonwealth (Australians, New Zeelanders, etc.), The Free French, Germans, Italians, and the Americans fight it out. There could be a lot of new unites Americans Grant and Lee tanks after the invasion, the British could have their 25 pounder and Cruiser Tank Mark, Crusador, Germans their PZ4 that were better than their adversary at the time, Italians their Fiat tanks . The ability to build heavy fortifications like “pill boxes” and big mine fields.
Just think about the epic battles being fought – El Alamein, Tobruk, etc.
Generally this is early in the war so nothing for the heavy tank fans. This would be a light amour war, but heavy artillery. I have seen pictures of Tigers in North African but as think they were quite rare.
You could have commonwealth (Australians, New Zeelanders, etc.), The Free French, Germans, Italians, and the Americans fight it out. There could be a lot of new unites Americans Grant and Lee tanks after the invasion, the British could have their 25 pounder and Cruiser Tank Mark, Crusador, Germans their PZ4 that were better than their adversary at the time, Italians their Fiat tanks . The ability to build heavy fortifications like “pill boxes” and big mine fields.
Just think about the epic battles being fought – El Alamein, Tobruk, etc.
28 Nov 2014, 09:38 AM
#57
Posts: 133
1. More Soviet units. Maybe some of inter-war tanks: BT-7, T-26, T-28 or T-35.
2. Japan's Kwantung Army faction.
2. Japan's Kwantung Army faction.
The balance is a lie.
The balance is a lie.
The balance is a lie.
The balance is a lie.
The balance is a lie.
The balance is a lie.
The balance is a lie.
28 Nov 2014, 09:57 AM
#58
Posts: 710
Random faction search for automatch.
This, only thing I wish for.
28 Nov 2014, 10:05 AM
#59
Posts: 829
I wish Relic isn't thinking this
28 Nov 2014, 10:36 AM
#60
Posts: 76
more commanders.........
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1262