Relic... just fix it please...
Posts: 110
RELIC, just fix that random please...
Automatching against AT with random mate is wrong imho.
Also automatching random guys with top 500 mate when you are top 3, really sucks.
Getting bored then I play automatch and facing top 5 AT team with 100 hours played mate... In a row with different guys...
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Way too few players in mp and I don't find waiting hour for uneven game really that appealing.
Posts: 117
Thats... not gonna happen, ever.
Way too few players in mp and I don't find waiting hour for uneven game really that appealing.
yeah the MP population is too low, i personally like playing against better opponents, one of the only ways to learn IMO
Posts: 818
Inverse put this in the shoutbox the other day its pretty interesting
Posts: 110
yeah the MP population is too low, i personally like playing against better opponents, one of the only ways to learn IMO
Thats... not gonna happen, ever.
Way too few players in mp and I don't find waiting hour for uneven game really that appealing.
I can't believe that there are no top 100 players online and searching automatch. and having guy from top 400-500...
Only guys with 100 hours played?
I was #1 on rank, but lost 3 matches in a row now cause of that reason... beginner mates...
That is really so unfair and boring...
They should remove AT vs random or balance top ranking system... opponents both top 20, my mate top 400. That's funniest.
Posts: 110
http://joostdevblog.blogspot.nl/2014/11/why-good-matchmaking-requires-enormous.html
Inverse put this in the shoutbox the other day its pretty interesting
Actually that means nothing for me...
Few times happened that my steam friend with same skill/rank was searching automatch with me but I matched with guy from top 500... It doesn't works well, Relic has to fix.
Posts: 655
Permanently BannedPeople who play video games have lives, you know.
Posts: 107
Lots of people here will advice you to find a team mate to play with. Its easier than re program the matchmaking system which mostly works fine given the amount of players being online at any given time.
Posts: 110
You do realize how small the "top 100" player base is right? You seem to think there are thousands of "top 100" players when by definition there can only be 100 of them (per faction).
People who play video games have lives, you know.
You can check top 100 player's playtime...
your post looks like it has more to do about you being super good and that you are not in the top 10 any more and less with how the matchmaking works.
Lots of people here will advice you to find a team mate to play with. Its easier than re program the matchmaking system which mostly works fine given the amount of players being online at any given time.
Bro, you mad? What about having a noobiest mates again and again?
and opponents always top 20. is this right?
Posts: 655
Permanently Banned
You can check top 100 player's playtime...
I'm aware of how to browse the leaderboards.
Don't make a thread about something, whining about how broken it is, and then act like you know more than the people trying to give you advice about it.
Posts: 2885
Posts: 680
The risk is that the ats would have less teams to steamroll...
Posts: 2070
Posts: 2885
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
fuck relic. their matchmaking is complete fucking trash. it matched me and my buddy who have hundreds of hours with the game with two other allies with only a dozen. its fucking pathetic. fuck you relic
Likely because you or them have waited so long for the pop that matchmaker made possible bracket to match with wider so you(or them) don't have to wait hour for a game.
It works like that in every single matchmaking I know maybe except the one SC2 uses, but they got the population needed to funnel it.
There is only one thing that fixes matchmaking-huge playerbase.
There is no other way, no magical fix or patch, even best system will fail miserably if poll to draw from is too small for accurate matching.
Posts: 93
Posts: 710
Check site rules if your post is missing.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
What you all say is true but for me it's ridiculous that AT is matched against random team... That just shouldn't happen given that matchmaker "knows" who is AT and who is random. Also leaderboards have no sense when it is done just like it is now.
One hundred percent true. It was not one time when i got matched with a random opponent against teams. That's not right.
Posts: 2070
ya its pretty cool when you get matched with folks that are not at your level on the ladder while the other team has players that know what they are doing.... they proceed to destroy your teammate and then destroy you..... tonight has been really bad for me....
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.883398.689+5
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.998646.607+2
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.454189.706+8
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, desertsafariprice
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM