Login

russian armor

Stuart DPS

16 Nov 2014, 17:18 PM
#1
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

the stuart has pretty terrible dps against everything due to a combination of poor accuracy and abysmal fire rate. it's got an AoE profile slightly better than most dedicated AT weapons. right now it soft counters ATless infantry (it works similar to the V against infantry) and soft counters vehicles. it's only redeeming factor right now is shell shock, which is pretty good with a hard at source.

part of the problem is the low dps and part of it is that terrible accuracy. as far as i can tell a single shrek volks will beat the stuart. given its cost i think it deserves a general dps increase but especially so against infantry. this could be from a better aoe profile (doesn't effect its AV), faster fire rate, or better accuracy.

it doesn't need much more dps and i don't think it needs any other changes but the stuart is pretty lackluster for its cost.
16 Nov 2014, 17:28 PM
#2
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

It wants to be jack of all trades and generalist tank of light armor.

It got poor mobility, poor health, poor RoF, performs poorly against AI and other armor.

Pretty much a T34/76 of light armor.
Vaz
16 Nov 2014, 17:35 PM
#3
avatar of Vaz

Posts: 1158

I avoid it
16 Nov 2014, 17:36 PM
#4
avatar of sneakking

Posts: 655

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post16 Nov 2014, 17:28 PMKatitof
It wants to be jack of all trades and generalist tank of light armor.

It got poor mobility, poor health, poor RoF, performs poorly against AI and other armor.

Pretty much a T34/76 of light armor.


well jack of all trades would imply that it's actually decent at all of those things it does, which it doesnt.

I'd love to see this vehicle get some love.
16 Nov 2014, 22:04 PM
#5
avatar of Romeo
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 115

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

It's also too fragile.
16 Nov 2014, 22:06 PM
#6
avatar of HardworkingBulldozer

Posts: 117

Make it at least partially effective against the Puma, for AI purposes, we got sherman.
16 Nov 2014, 22:10 PM
#7
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Stug III - 230 MP 80 F
Sturat - 240 MP 70 F

:lolol:
16 Nov 2014, 22:19 PM
#8
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

I kinda like the Stuart, but it could use a buff..
16 Nov 2014, 22:21 PM
#9
avatar of Bob Loblaw

Posts: 156

The Stuart crit ability used to be awesome and reliable for stunning heavy tanks or reliably setting AT traps. Now the unit just sucks. I think it comes out at a good time but it needs a serious buff to be worth it. Getting 70 fuel worth of damage out of it just doesn't happen. Or if the shrek blob gets nerfed maybe that would work.
16 Nov 2014, 22:40 PM
#10
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

i have no issues with the mobility or health. they're meh but it's a light tank and i accept that. it's one my favorite units, partly because it's a tiny tank. at least it could kill things if it had a dps increase.

it takes as long for a stuart to kill a wurfrahmen as it does for one shrek volk to kill it, this includes both of the missing a couple times, some at point blank range. the stuart also does not have smoke.

the crit ability i've never seen work; maybe it just takes more than 5 seconds to fire. the stun shot works fine.
16 Nov 2014, 22:46 PM
#11
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

the stun shot works fine.


No, it's not because it's targeting infantry.

On the other hand... Luchs - 345/50 :lolol:
16 Nov 2014, 22:49 PM
#12
avatar of Khan

Posts: 578

Definitely needs a ROF or AOE buff.
16 Nov 2014, 22:56 PM
#13
avatar of DakkaIsMagic

Posts: 403

Needs to be cheaper. Its kinda the same cost as a stug!
16 Nov 2014, 22:58 PM
#14
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
Swap it for the chaffee
16 Nov 2014, 23:00 PM
#15
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470



No, it's not because it's targeting infantry.

On the other hand... Luchs - 345/50 :lolol:


tell it to attack tank, activate shell shock. if activating shell shock fucks up the targeting priority than activate shell shock, target tank. i have no issues with it although i've seen others mention that problem.
and
16 Nov 2014, 23:05 PM
#16
avatar of and

Posts: 140

Stug III - 230 MP 80 F
Sturat - 240 MP 70 F

:lolol:


Wow shit.
17 Nov 2014, 00:38 AM
#17
avatar of willyto
Patrion 15

Posts: 115

Swap it for the chaffee

Cynthia posted a video with the recording of some tanks sound:



We can see on 0:25 a M24 Chaffee being recorded :huhsign:

They need to add it instead of the Stuart. As I said on another thread also it was supposed to replace the Stuart in 1944.

Back to topic, the Stuart it's made of thin paper and it's way too expensive on Fuel. By the time it arrives there is too much AT that just kill it almost instantly, Stun shot targets infantry and crit ability doesn't work at all because by the time it is about to shoot it has been killed already by Schrecks blob.

I like to use it versus Osther though.
17 Nov 2014, 01:39 AM
#18
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

Stug III - 230 MP 80 F
Sturat - 240 MP 70 F

:lolol:


i think stewart could use more AI power since its stun shots and engine crit shots are good v. tanks.
17 Nov 2014, 01:41 AM
#19
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

Stug III - 230 MP 80 F
Stuart - 240 MP 70 F


Stug III tech cost: 560MP 125F
Stuart tech cost: 200MP 80F

if you're looking at direct unit cost, the fact that it costs the same as the Scott is just as egregious... that being said, the stuart has really terrible damage output. It could be dropped to 50 fuel and I don't think anyone would really mind.

Currently it feels like it is too expensive to be disposable or spammable, too little health to survive AT weapons, too little speed and acceleration to avoid said antitank weapons, not enough firepower to hit and run before the AT can reface, and it can't even wipe squads on retreat properly which even the greyhound can do.

17 Nov 2014, 01:48 AM
#20
avatar of What Doth Life?!
Patrion 27

Posts: 1664

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Nov 2014, 00:38 AMwillyto

Cynthia posted a video with the recording of some tanks sound:



We can see on 0:25 a M24 Chaffee being recorded :huhsign:

They need to add it instead of the Stuart. As I said on another thread also it was supposed to replace the Stuart in 1944.

Back to topic, the Stuart it's made of thin paper and it's way too expensive on Fuel. By the time it arrives there is too much AT that just kill it almost instantly, Stun shot targets infantry and crit ability doesn't work at all because by the time it is about to shoot it has been killed already by Schrecks blob.

I like to use it versus Osther though.


Oh crap I missed that they record the Chaffe!!! Fingers crossed for it in AA and toes crossed for the M18 Hellcat to make its way to COH2.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

651 users are online: 651 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49152
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM