Login

russian armor

My wish for better infantry combat

23 Oct 2014, 19:23 PM
#1
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

Hello ladies and gents of the COH2.org community! I would like to share my thoughts on infantry combat and why it is problematic and how it can be improved.

I am really enjoying the combat in the first 10 minutes of the game. I especially like the infantry play in the first several minutes. Flanking is rewarded and proper positioning is important. It is really satisfying running up your conscript squad next to a gren squad, where the conscripts close-range advantage make it more lethal. Flanks around machine guns also feel wonderful.

This dynamic seems to change drastically in the mid and late game. There are more units to control first off, so micro and attention is harder. However most of these units are either vetted or elite infantry. They have great damage but also significant durability. These units, when blobbed, really make infantry combat not very fun. These blobs can do a lot of damage, even to units in cover, and take a lot of damage. This diminished the advantages of smart flanking and good cover.

I would like late game infantry fights to retain the dynamics of those first minute skirmishes, where flanking and cover are key to success.

I am not sure how to fix this issue, but I hope you players feel the same way about this problem. Perhaps Relic should:

1. tone down infantry lethality to discourage a-moving powerful units that pulverize everything
2. change the bonuses/penalties for units in cover/negative cover
3. ???

23 Oct 2014, 19:25 PM
#2
avatar of VIPUKS

Posts: 431 | Subs: 1

Everything is fine. Case closed.
23 Oct 2014, 19:35 PM
#3
avatar of Hon3ynuts

Posts: 818

Offensive vet outweighs the impact of defensive vet bonuses at the moment. While units may be balanced initially dynamics change with vet adding ~40% accuracy and 20% weapon cooldown while only mitigating the effects of the accuracy with defensive bonuses. In short vet = everybody dies faster

If you translate some of those offensive bonuses into defensive ones combat will slow down and it will be more rewarding to manuever into different ranges and cover discouraging standing in the open.

Also with lower damage lmgs won't kill a model just about every burst.

This will also make supression more helpful as mgs will be harder to focus down since they don't get any survivability bonuses with vet making them quite vulnerable

at least thats what i think should be done. This could make the blobs super durable, but since you can still blow them up with tanks and grenades i think durability is more counterable, Raw dps is harder to counterplay
23 Oct 2014, 19:40 PM
#4
avatar of spajn
Donator 11

Posts: 928

You make the problem worse by decreasing infantry lethality. Remember infantry damage was much lower at the beginning of coh2 and cover didn't matter at all. Every squad could just move up to a enemy in green cover with minimal damage and throw their grenades and grenades decided almost every infantry fight, not cover.

Just make machineguns better at killing and bonus vs blobs and decrease their crew to 3 like vcoh because it works and prevents machinegun spam.
23 Oct 2014, 19:48 PM
#5
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 19:40 PMspajn
You make the problem worse by decreasing infantry lethality. Remember infantry damage was much lower at the beginning of coh2 and cover didn't matter at all. Every squad could just move up to a enemy in green cover with minimal damage and throw their grenades and grenades decided almost every infantry fight, not cover.


That is a good point. Good find :D That was not my intention hehe
23 Oct 2014, 19:53 PM
#6
avatar of MoerserKarL
Donator 22

Posts: 1108

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 19:25 PMVIPUKS
Everything is fine. Case closed.


edit:

If you want this kind of infantry dynamic, you should try men of war assault squad ;)
23 Oct 2014, 23:27 PM
#7
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 19:40 PMspajn
You make the problem worse by decreasing infantry lethality. Remember infantry damage was much lower at the beginning of coh2 and cover didn't matter at all. Every squad could just move up to a enemy in green cover with minimal damage and throw their grenades and grenades decided almost every infantry fight, not cover.

Just make machineguns better at killing and bonus vs blobs and decrease their crew to 3 like vcoh because it works and prevents machinegun spam.


I would say it's rather a matter of tweaking vet, long range weapon dps, MG and blobs.
If you read him again, he just want to have late game stage of game feel a bit more like first 10-15mins where lethality is there but not too high because of upgrades.

24 Oct 2014, 00:41 AM
#8
avatar of wongtp

Posts: 647

lmgs are the core of the problem. long range units are much safer and also more effective to use than short range troopers. together with good grenades on some of these infantry, they can fight smg troops in a pinch or rape them from afar.

there is no fun in infantry combat once lmg upgrades and obers come to play.
24 Oct 2014, 00:42 AM
#9
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

I remember November infantry combat of last year....

Never again.
24 Oct 2014, 00:57 AM
#10
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Oct 2014, 00:41 AMwongtp
lmgs are the core of the problem. long range units are much safer and also more effective to use than short range troopers. together with good grenades on some of these infantry, they can fight smg troops in a pinch or rape them from afar.

there is no fun in infantry combat once lmg upgrades and obers come to play.
Change LMG to original style again? Short-mid range weapon.
24 Oct 2014, 01:15 AM
#11
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Oct 2014, 00:57 AMsteel
Change LMG to original style again? Short-mid range weapon.


OMG, what i'm supposed to do with this useless conscripts nao!

24 Oct 2014, 01:17 AM
#12
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1



OMG, what i'm supposed to do with this useless conscripts nao!

6 rifles. Still good to kill at long range.
24 Oct 2014, 01:20 AM
#13
avatar of Medster

Posts: 13

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Oct 2014, 00:41 AMwongtp
lmgs are the core of the problem. long range units are much safer and also more effective to use than short range troopers. together with good grenades on some of these infantry, they can fight smg troops in a pinch or rape them from afar.

there is no fun in infantry combat once lmg upgrades and obers come to play.


It'd be nice if there was actually a downside to choosing lmgs, like disabled grenades or disabled AT.
24 Oct 2014, 03:44 AM
#14
avatar of Glassfish
Benefactor 340

Posts: 88

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Oct 2014, 01:20 AMMedster


It'd be nice if there was actually a downside to choosing lmgs, like disabled grenades or disabled AT.


well when you talk about LMG units i assume you are talking about Grenadiers mainly, they do loose the ability to shoot on the move makeing then less effective in offensive situations or any situations where micro is required or where they have to move often, they also loose effectiveness as the enemy closes in range and at close range the LMG-42 does the same damage as a regular Mauser K98k

and considering the 60muni price tag they should gain the advantages

you also have to remember the grenadiers are not durable due to having only a 4 man squad which makes the purpose of Grenadiers clear long range only, lmg just gives them more relevance late game
24 Oct 2014, 06:25 AM
#15
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Oct 2014, 00:57 AMsteel
Change LMG to original style again? Short-mid range weapon.


Maybe opt for flat DPS regardless of range? Or model-based success (low dps vs singles, bonus dps vs blobs)? Or maybe a flat +__ DPS to their standard weapons?
24 Oct 2014, 06:29 AM
#16
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

Nerf these ridiculous "received accuracy" bonuses some units get. Mainly Volks.
24 Oct 2014, 06:31 AM
#17
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1



Maybe opt for flat DPS regardless of range? Or model-based success (low dps vs singles, bonus dps vs blobs)? Or maybe a flat +__ DPS to their standard weapons?
I like this. Flat DPS would be good.
24 Oct 2014, 06:36 AM
#18
avatar of wongtp

Posts: 647



well when you talk about LMG units i assume you are talking about Grenadiers mainly, they do loose the ability to shoot on the move makeing then less effective in offensive situations or any situations where micro is required or where they have to move often, they also loose effectiveness as the enemy closes in range and at close range the LMG-42 does the same damage as a regular Mauser K98k

and considering the 60muni price tag they should gain the advantages

you also have to remember the grenadiers are not durable due to having only a 4 man squad which makes the purpose of Grenadiers clear long range only, lmg just gives them more relevance late game


what micro? A+move with lmg blob.
24 Oct 2014, 15:05 PM
#19
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070



Maybe opt for flat DPS regardless of range? Or model-based success (low dps vs singles, bonus dps vs blobs)? Or maybe a flat +__ DPS to their standard weapons?



Hey good ideas :D



It is a delicate balancing act. Perhaps dps nerfs and received accuracy nerfs and or cover bonuses changed.

Too much DPS nerf = Units just running up to your face regardless of situation.
Received accuracy nerfs - things die too fast

So it would be good to change both of these at the same time. Some units like Volks and Obers just never die. They tank so much damage without really being in cover.
24 Oct 2014, 15:16 PM
#20
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

Hmm I think one of the biggest reasons why late-game infantry combat is so much less exciting than early game infantry combat is because in the late game there is yellow cover EVERYWHERE and it works in all directions.

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

583 users are online: 1 member and 582 guests
chikkamagalur
1 post in the last 24h
13 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53294
Welcome our newest member, chikkamagalur
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM