Login

russian armor

Rear Echelons

17 Oct 2014, 01:16 AM
#1
avatar of The Soldier

Posts: 218

So, I'm fairly certain we all know that the USF Rear Echelons are possibly the worst engineer unit out of all the factions. They lack any combat abilities, unlike both Axis engineers (who can handle combat fairly easily), lack anti-garrison without having to build a pit of death (unlike the vanilla armies' engineers, who can get flamethrowers), and lack any explosives whatsoever, unlike EVERY OTHER engineer in the game.

My suggestion, although feel free to object to it, is to arms all the Rear Echelons with M2 Carbines upon reaching Vet 2. It's effectively an automatic upgrade compared to the M1 Carbine they have right now. Gameplay-wise, they should become reasonable assault troops, better than all the other engineers (save Sturmpioneer) in combat duties. History-wise, troops were able to field-modify M1 Carbines to make them select-fire with a kit that was handed out. A few made it to Europe by the end of 1944, so that's covered.

Comments on this? I personally feel that this could make up for at least some of the shortcomings of the Rear Echelons.
17 Oct 2014, 01:31 AM
#2
avatar of Hati

Posts: 39

They become somewhat good infantry squad if you have munitions to arm them with m1919s for example. Also they can build tank traps which provide green cover and hard to destroy. I don't think they underperforming.
17 Oct 2014, 01:43 AM
#3
avatar of broodwarjc

Posts: 824

They get FREE grenades from fighting pits and get a free fifth man at Vet 2. They are REAR echelon troops, they are not supposed to assault, but fortify and lock down areas behind the lines. They are also the cheapest infantry in the game I believe, they are fine.
17 Oct 2014, 02:06 AM
#4
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
They get FREE grenades from fighting pits and get a free fifth man at Vet 2. They are REAR echelon troops, they are not supposed to assault, but fortify and lock down areas behind the lines. They are also the cheapest infantry in the game I believe, they are fine.


ur joking right?

They do almost ZERO damage to anything. i only give them double zooks for my early game AT. cus i cant risk losing DPS on any of my rifles.
17 Oct 2014, 02:37 AM
#5
avatar of Herr Schlake

Posts: 25

Except not very long ago there were people spamming these. When BARs didn't suck, equipping a rear echelon squad with these or 1919s made them the most cost effective infantry unit in the game. They are definitely fine as is.
17 Oct 2014, 02:37 AM
#6
avatar of The Soldier

Posts: 218

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2014, 01:31 AMHati
They become somewhat good infantry squad if you have munitions to arm them with m1919s for example. Also they can build tank traps which provide green cover and hard to destroy. I don't think they underperforming.

Eh, I tend to stay away from Tank Traps - far as I can tell, Panthers and Brummbars still just crush them, making them worthless. M1919A6s also require a doctrine, so that's not always going to be the case, although if they do get M1919s, they do get fairly effective, but hey, so does anything else that picks it up. :) And I'm not about to put 120 munitions into a squad that's very liable to perish quickly.

They get FREE grenades from fighting pits and get a free fifth man at Vet 2. They are REAR echelon troops, they are not supposed to assault, but fortify and lock down areas behind the lines. They are also the cheapest infantry in the game I believe, they are fine.

Yes, free grenades that, first of all, requires them to be inside of a Fighting Position, and second of all, makes them EXTREMELY vulnerable to counter-rifle grenades from Grenadiers, which will literally wipe the squad 100% of the time unless they have more than 4 guys. The grenades also do 40 damage - half a soldier's health pool. It's a niche tool that can come in handy with accurate ranged support, but it needs positions that can be easily defended.

Cheapest infantry, yes, but also the most worthless infantry in the game. Taking into consideration the USF's Vehicle Crews, there's literally no reason to get them except to get Minesweepers - which in an of themselves makes them worth getting, but not for any other reason I know of.
17 Oct 2014, 02:38 AM
#7
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
Except not very long ago


Your comment is invalid
17 Oct 2014, 02:40 AM
#8
avatar of Herr Schlake

Posts: 25

What a surprise, Ratchet wants to make his American unit more powerful despite already being good with weapon upgrades and being among the cheapest units in the game. When BARs get rebuffed I can see these being spammed again.
17 Oct 2014, 02:48 AM
#9
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Yes, spend hundreds of munitions to deal with infantry that can counter them without the need of munitions themselves. Cheap engineer unit that i dont keep more than one of in my forces, mainly for repairs.

Spend 120 munitions or instead buy another rifleman squad. "Hard" decision.
17 Oct 2014, 04:10 AM
#10
avatar of heeroduo

Posts: 144

OK you can spend some muni for them. and you can get more strong RE.

but other engineers don't need muni :D Remember sturm pios :D
17 Oct 2014, 05:02 AM
#11
avatar of kafrion

Posts: 371

What a surprise, Ratchet wants to make his American unit more powerful despite already being good with weapon upgrades and being among the cheapest units in the game. When BARs get rebuffed I can see these being spammed again.


because spamming 120 munitions is easy right and they wouldnt get focusfired to oblivion ? and why would you not equip the bars on the actual riflemen that you have already produced which would have made sense , if just one bar, was enough to make rets > grens thats a problem for bars not rets . what a surprise , axis fanboy has no clue
17 Oct 2014, 05:04 AM
#12
avatar of ASneakyFox

Posts: 365

i wish theyd raise the muntions cost for volley fire up to 25, maybe even 30 (depending on testing) in exchange for increasing the speed at which volley fire takes effect. I've NEVER used it succesfully except to win out against another pioneer squad in a 1v1 firefight. In normal mid game firefights.. the combat tends to be over by the time volley fire takes effect.
17 Oct 2014, 05:07 AM
#13
avatar of kafrion

Posts: 371

i wish theyd raise the muntions cost for volley fire up to 25, maybe even 30 (depending on testing) in exchange for increasing the speed at which volley fire takes effect. I've NEVER used it succesfully except to win out against another pioneer squad in a 1v1 firefight. In normal mid game firefights.. the combat tends to be over by the time volley fire takes effect.


even with that pios will generally loose one model and then proceed to overpower your rets
17 Oct 2014, 05:08 AM
#14
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1



ur joking right?

They do almost ZERO damage to anything. i only give them double zooks for my early game AT. cus i cant risk losing DPS on any of my rifles.
Just bump up their damage to a reasonable level. Never understood why they should not be able to kill anyone even if they shoot for a minute.

While we have obers that can beat enemies that outnumber them.....
17 Oct 2014, 18:04 PM
#15
avatar of Herr Schlake

Posts: 25

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Oct 2014, 05:02 AMkafrion


because spamming 120 munitions is easy right and they wouldnt get focusfired to oblivion ? and why would you not equip the bars on the actual riflemen that you have already produced which would have made sense , if just one bar, was enough to make rets > grens thats a problem for bars not rets . what a surprise , axis fanboy has no clue


Buffing a unit with no serious thought of the ramifications that this will bring when BARs and zooks are brought up to an acceptable level just shows how shortsighted this community is. Clearly cheapest unit in the game means nothing to you. Least of all that given weapons, these squads perform way above their cost. High level players were spamming these not two patches ago for a reason. You want to buff RET fine, but they should not be allowed to pick up weapons. The problem is bars are an awful upgrade for rifles right now because they already have such high DPS. In order to make them worth it they must be a sizeable upgrade for rifles. And when they are that means that RET with these upgrades will be able to out DPS and win for cost against squads they shouldn't be beating.
17 Oct 2014, 18:30 PM
#16
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

The problem is bars are an awful upgrade for rifles right now because they already have such high DPS.


This comment shows ur complete ignorance towards this game
17 Oct 2014, 18:31 PM
#17
avatar of DakkaIsMagic

Posts: 403

What are you talking about? I use them instead of Riflemen all the time and end up winning games. They are great at holding the line and I dont even spend mun on getting them BARs or anything, just save it for the fighting pits to protect the ground you have taken. I tend to use four with the LT and Capt and they do there job.

There fine, if you want to get more out of them, pry to the RNG god from the stupid warspoil system that you get the bulletin for them.

17 Oct 2014, 18:47 PM
#18
avatar of gunther09
Donator 22

Posts: 538

put them in the m20 and get a Shrek squad for 160mp. Very nice.
But beware: they do not auto repair once they exit the m20
17 Oct 2014, 19:29 PM
#19
avatar of kafrion

Posts: 371



This comment shows ur complete ignorance towards this game


i stoped reading his post exactly at this point too :D , yeah dem rifles thgey make even g43 grens jealous with their high dps Kappa
17 Oct 2014, 19:59 PM
#20
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

IMO they don't need any kind of buff. they are very cheap, and they are good support units. And people tend to forget "Volley Fire" which is very useful when used right. They are not supposed to fight, but I think some kind of garrison-clearing weapon (FT) could make them more useful. But again, IMO they are fine.
I think another reason is that in most situations (and in 1v1 and 2v2 of course) Rifles are pretty much superior (they can get to mid range which they excel at) and it would be too much DPS if your REs had extra firepower.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 19
unknown 6
Canada 3
Germany 2

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

1010 users are online: 1010 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49080
Welcome our newest member, Keensler
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM