Login

russian armor

Priorities for COH2

24 Sep 2014, 13:14 PM
#1
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

Hallo to everybody,

i want to state the obvious and hopefully you Guys (the community) will follow so maybe Relic realizes that and do something about it.

So, priorities

1) Biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig BUG fixing patch (Since balance-fixing is so hard for Relic:D)

2) Optimization for this gorgeous Game so that more people can enjoy its full potential.

3) Balance the Game for all modes (as good as it gets). I know, some will say, first for 1v1s others say for 4v4s. I don't care to be honest, just get it done. This might be the toughest one but you have proven to us that you can do it (and sometimes not).

4) All the other stuff like new Units, Factions DLCs (please stop with that milking a cow DLC policy).

This is it!!!!

Thoughts?
24 Sep 2014, 13:17 PM
#2
avatar of Lazarraga
Donator 11

Posts: 204

24 Sep 2014, 14:50 PM
#3
avatar of boxman80

Posts: 57

I never understand why 3v3 and 4v4 are written of as "unfixable", these modes are half the game (probably more in real terms) and should be balanced even if it's just in the way of restrictions or multiplier bonuses that only apply during these sized games.

Sure 1v1's and 2v2's are great personal challenges and a good way to lord it over players (when you're half decent) but writing larger games off in the current way is unacceptable, especially in this day and age.
24 Sep 2014, 15:04 PM
#4
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

They should definitely fix the bugs and the most glaring balance issues such as Kubel. Although I love 4v4 mode, they need to get ready the game for the ESL.
24 Sep 2014, 15:18 PM
#5
avatar of Imagelessbean

Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1

Is the mg bug still in? I had a DSHK face the wrong direction yesterday.

Yes #1 priority: FIX BUGS.
#2: Fix balance in team games so its not just a ROFL stomp of allies.
25 Sep 2014, 09:34 AM
#6
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

For a thread like this to get attention from the community, it has to be writen bei someone like inverse or sibirian? I Don't get it, no one wants this changes? I am a little disappointed :-(
25 Sep 2014, 10:08 AM
#7
avatar of Siberian

Posts: 545 | Subs: 3

This could've been laid out and written in a much more informative and constructive manner but I think it's the fact that everyone is aware of all these things that you have mentioned. We're just going around in a circle and the best we can do is to keep giving feedback and wait for the fixes to arrive.
25 Sep 2014, 12:15 PM
#8
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

I get your point Siberian and thank you for replying. But as you said, there are many Threads about this, i just wanted to write one just objectively. I mean only the points that count.

Anyway, i hope Relic will fix the millions (exaggeration) bugs first because they are really to many of them in the game. It is a win win situation if you think about it, the players will stop complaining + they will enjoy the game more and then Relic has more time to balance the Game.
25 Sep 2014, 12:44 PM
#9
avatar of TNrg

Posts: 640

We're just going around in a circle and the best we can do is to keep giving feedback and wait for the fixes to arrive.


How long did this phase take with vCoH? I wasn't around in it's first years, I think I started playing it in 2010ish.
25 Sep 2014, 12:55 PM
#10
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 12:44 PMTNrg


How long did this phase take with vCoH? I wasn't around in it's first years, I think I started playing it in 2010ish.


Around 3 years and 2 expansions. Certain bugs remain to this day.
25 Sep 2014, 13:34 PM
#11
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

Well, the level of interaction and communication during the balance patch beta and 2.602 drummed up a lot of community support for the game and franchise. Mind you, this was around the time preorders for CoH2 were needed, so it makes sense in retrospect.
25 Sep 2014, 14:17 PM
#12
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

What I don't really understand is why in the world didn't they give USF more comanders with powerfull air strikes (and especially AT air strikes). That would be so realistic and USF would answer better to strong german armor in late game.
25 Sep 2014, 14:38 PM
#13
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 14:17 PMJohnnyB
What I don't really understand is why in the world didn't they give USF more comanders with powerfull air strikes (and especially AT air strikes). That would be so realistic and USF would answer better to strong german armor in late game.


The reason is very simple, at the time of multiplayer, which is 44-45 Luftwaffe was at its prime, allies or soviets could not launch normal day attacks without heavy losses, this is why allies have berely any plane based off maps, while axis have plentiful with 2 exclusively luftwaffe oriented doctrines, it is also why all axis air strikes are more cost effective, maybe except SCAS vs P-47.

Oh wait...
25 Sep 2014, 14:57 PM
#14
avatar of boxman80

Posts: 57

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 14:17 PMJohnnyB
What I don't really understand is why in the world didn't they give USF more comanders with powerfull air strikes (and especially AT air strikes). That would be so realistic and USF would answer better to strong german armor in late game.


Agreed, the US superior airpower is under used for the USF and yes, if included this should more than compensate for the lack of heavy tanks.
25 Sep 2014, 15:00 PM
#15
avatar of SlaYoU

Posts: 400

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 14:38 PMKatitof


The reason is very simple, at the time of multiplayer, which is 44-45 Luftwaffe was at its prime, allies or soviets could not launch normal day attacks without heavy losses, this is why allies have berely any plane based off maps, while axis have plentiful with 2 exclusively luftwaffe oriented doctrines, it is also why all axis air strikes are more cost effective, maybe except SCAS vs P-47.

Oh wait...


Reading lesson of the day:
Luftwaffe Ground Forces Doctrine.

The only German faction that is 1944-1945 is Oberkommando (or maybe you are playing another game? Would explain a lot actually), please list all the air strikes the faction has. One paratroops drop, that's it.
25 Sep 2014, 15:16 PM
#16
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post25 Sep 2014, 15:00 PMSlaYoU


Reading lesson of the day:
Luftwaffe Ground Forces Doctrine.


Which doesn't have one of the most potent plane based offmaps that grants free squad and can be used in FOW at all.

Wait again...
25 Sep 2014, 16:06 PM
#17
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

:ot: guys, :ot:. So please stop!!!

Thank you!
25 Sep 2014, 18:08 PM
#18
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

I like that you're moderating your own thread, Sandreas. :) This is how it should be.
25 Sep 2014, 21:05 PM
#19
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

Thanks MajorBloodnok :D. I stop now so you can do it, i hope it will not be necessary :)
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 19
unknown 13
Canada 2
Germany 1

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

941 users are online: 941 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49081
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM