Login

russian armor

Free for all weapon racks (americans)

Let USF weapon racks available for teammates
Option Distribution Votes
54%
32%
14%
Total votes: 71
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
12 Sep 2014, 14:57 PM
#1
avatar of jackill2611

Posts: 246

It's an idea. So, you upgrade your soviet HQ with medics - your teammate can use them, right, USA partner upgrades his base with bars/bazookas. Why don't make that weapon racks Available for teammates(maybe just increase muni cost like for USA = 60 munis, for others - 90 munis)
12 Sep 2014, 14:59 PM
#2
avatar of KovuTalli

Posts: 332

I thought it already was? At least for other USA Team mates. Unless they patched it out.
12 Sep 2014, 14:59 PM
#3
avatar of jackill2611

Posts: 246

No, teammates cant get access to weapon racks
12 Sep 2014, 15:08 PM
#4
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281

I think yes case right now US is the worst faction in team games.
12 Sep 2014, 15:14 PM
#5
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

I think yes case right now US is the worst faction in team games.


Feels like if people want to play Allies with a competetive mindset, they choose Soviets. You simply choose USF if you feel like it, not to be competetive. USF honestly feels like the weakest faction out there.
12 Sep 2014, 15:17 PM
#6
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281



Feels like if people want to play Allies with a competetive mindset, they choose Soviets. You simply choose USF if you feel like it, not to be competetive. USF honestly feels like the weakest faction out there.

they are, I saw in a tread on the offical forum the win precentage of the best 200 and US was the weakes in all modes.
12 Sep 2014, 15:24 PM
#7
avatar of steel

Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1

I'm not interested to see shock troops carry bazooka and m1919a6 walking around dealing death and destruction to everything save the tanks.
12 Sep 2014, 17:24 PM
#8
avatar of juggernauth

Posts: 118

Rofl suuureee.




No.
12 Sep 2014, 19:42 PM
#9
avatar of Albus

Posts: 125

lol, imagine Conscript squads with duel BAR/Bazooka equip. Nope. Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope.

My biggest problems with the Americans is that if you don't go for the infantry doctrine, Rifleman don't scale into the late game. Like, at all. Especially against the OKW. Also, lack of mines on echelons is frustrating and makes dealing with (super-)heavy armour an extreme pain in the ass.
12 Sep 2014, 19:55 PM
#10
avatar of korgoth

Posts: 170

It could MAYBE work out:

1.Like OP said it should cost more for your allies. (60muni to 90muni for exemple)

2.Work only for the BARs and Zookas. (doctrinal M1919 not available to allies)
12 Sep 2014, 20:16 PM
#11
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

I thought it already was? At least for other USA Team mates. Unless they patched it out.


USA Player can buy from other USF bases if he researched his own first. If you research BAR's, you'll be able to buy BAR's at any base. If your teammate researched Bazookas but you did not, you will not be able to buy them at any base.
12 Sep 2014, 20:25 PM
#12
avatar of lanciano

Posts: 210

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Sep 2014, 19:42 PMAlbus
lol, imagine Conscript squads with duel BAR/Bazooka equip. Nope. Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope.

My biggest problems with the Americans is that if you don't go for the infantry doctrine, Rifleman don't scale into the late game. Like, at all. Especially against the OKW. Also, lack of mines on echelons is frustrating and makes dealing with (super-)heavy armour an extreme pain in the ass.


totally agree +1
12 Sep 2014, 20:56 PM
#13
avatar of JHeartless

Posts: 1637



totally agree +1


+2

But I would like interchangeable weapon slots on Riflemen. So I can swap out a BAR with a Bazooka if I so desire. Not locking a weapon into the hands of a rifle squad FOEVA. Its a rack. Put down the damn BAR for someone else to take and pickup that ZOOK!
12 Sep 2014, 21:23 PM
#14
avatar of jackill2611

Posts: 246

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Sep 2014, 19:42 PMAlbus
lol, imagine Conscript squads with duel BAR/Bazooka equip. Nope. Nope nope nope nope nope nope nope.

My biggest problems with the Americans is that if you don't go for the infantry doctrine, Rifleman don't scale into the late game. Like, at all. Especially against the OKW. Also, lack of mines on echelons is frustrating and makes dealing with (super-)heavy armour an extreme pain in the ass.

Read carefully, muni price for teammate should be bigger. Noone should spend 4*90 munis to equip shitty con squad.
12 Sep 2014, 23:56 PM
#15
avatar of Cabreza

Posts: 656

No, sorry but shared weapon racks would destroy balance in team games.
13 Sep 2014, 02:38 AM
#18
avatar of Ohme
Honorary Member Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 889 | Subs: 1

I removed a post with no substance whose only goal was to insult coh2.org members. Show some restraint, and don't go out of your way to be an antagonist, Arclyte.
13 Sep 2014, 06:39 AM
#20
avatar of Airborne

Posts: 281

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Sep 2014, 23:56 PMCabreza
No, sorry but shared weapon racks would destroy balance in team games.

they is no balance in team games I gues. it can also make american lease bad in 2vs2.
I don´t think allies will be uber OP in team games if soviet can pick up 1 american weapen from ranks.
Win-Lose-Ratio from time span 27.8 - 7.9.2014.
Notice that numbers are rounded to 3 decimals and data is collect from top 200 players.

- Soviet OKW US Ostheer
2vs2 0.612 0.755 0.566 0.683
3vs3 0.563 0.821 0.547 0.737
4vs4 0.543 0.854 0.576 0.832
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

389 users are online: 1 member and 388 guests
WAAAGH2000
1 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49187
Welcome our newest member, manclubgayote
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM