how do you lose 3 squads and tanks if youre not blobbing? in fact, how the hell do you even lose a tank at all?
He pulls out a tank to rep > close up with Stuka > kills crew, tank or both.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
how do you lose 3 squads and tanks if youre not blobbing? in fact, how the hell do you even lose a tank at all?
Posts: 2053
He pulls out a tank to rep > close up with Stuka > kills crew, tank or both.
Posts: 647
You repair when no one is around... OKW must be maphacking to see that.
Posts: 21
Posts: 381
how do you lose 3 squads and tanks if youre not blobbing? in fact, how the hell do you even lose a tank at all?
Posts: 752
Because allies had to learn not to blob, and even then walking stuka can single handedly destroy 2-3 squads and tanks.
This is a knee jerk reaction to the same thing.
Relic obviously intended this as there is a 300+ thread on why the walking stuka is broken so they probably wanted the other rocket arty brought in line. It needs a cost increase, thats it.
Posts: 139
Thanks, but I asked him.
Meaning I want to hear his justification.
Posts: 139
Posts: 381
A lot of the maps have narrow choke points that can't be easily avoided, plus many times the stuka bombs will insta kill setup teams that can't get out fast enough.
I don't see a Kat doing that
Posts: 1108
Posts: 139
you fucking kidding right? kat destroys mgs and paks there is nothing that can be done. don't even go into okw. kat destroys their base buildings 1 or 2 strikes. fuck with armor pen bulletin in can even destroy p4's. kat can do this over and over and over every minute.
Posts: 381
I think a price increase is justified but making the cooldown equivalent is absurd consider the difference in damage output.
Posts: 139
I am. Kat every 60 seconds with this damage is way better.
Posts: 65
I think a price increase is justified but making the cooldown equivalent is absurd consider the difference in damage output.
Posts: 950 | Subs: 1
I think a price increase is justified but making the cooldown equivalent is absurd consider the difference in damage output.
Stuka does all of its damage instantly.
Kat takes quite a while and acts as an area denial weapon.
Additionally fals popping out of buildings can insta kill these with a faust and I am already seeing people in team games adapting.
Posts: 139
yes, lets consider the difference in damage. like milka said, 16 rockets at 160 damage is 2560 damage. compare that to 6 rockets at 200 damage which is only 1200 damage.
considering it only takes a single rocket for a squad wipe, ill take 16 over 6
the katyusha is also unpredictable and hits faster. you have less time to react and the rockets will hit more than just a straight line. you can even manipulate katyusha scatter to your advantage. if you want to quickly destroy a building, get close. if you want a large amount of spread to hit units that arent in a blob, barrage from max range.
if only soviets had cheaper AT infantry that also spawned from buildings.
Posts: 665
if only soviets had cheaper AT infantry that also spawned from buildings.
Posts: 692
Posts: 139
The shoe is on the other foot and jerry doesn't like it.
"just don't blob"
56 | |||||
2 | |||||
4 |