where is flanking
Posts: 366
I saw the WFA today as americans and rifles have smoke grenades of the bat(long range on them too) WTF???
For me this means we will not be seeing mg42s at all in mixed allies and american games at decent and high level play simply becoz it is easily outwitted. Althouh amercans dont have T0 tanks like russians or brits there is still vaulting in coh2 which can be used to pull amazing flanks in the early game with bars and what not.
i fear the we will be seeing grens vs rifles as the early game only.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Posts: 4928
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
You're not even using that right!
Improvising is always a good thing.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Tell me how much you know about flanking
One does not simply use an MG42
Tries to use an MG42, get´s stolen
"Flanking"
____________________
I fear way too much things.
Posts: 783 | Subs: 3
Posts: 366
While I am still not sold on free t0 smoke nades, any ability that cost munitions can't be used non-stop without consequences. It is still possible to relocate your MG after it gets smoked if you have adequate support.
plz somebody tell relic that americans should be an upgrades and strategic army rather than abilty based tactical army.
thx to dear vonivan for hijacking. I am not surprised that you DONT know flanking. I know you since coh1
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
thx to dear vonivan for hijacking. I am not surprised that you DONT know flanking. I know you since coh1
Smaug I know you too buddy, we played in VCoH. When you say "where is flanking" I just laugh because there is tons of flanking in CoH2, and even with smoke grenades it isn't that hard to just re-position your mg42, just like with dealing with regular mortars. Fact of the matter is this thread made me cringe, because I know you rarely play CoH2 and make ludicrous statements such as this. So please, if you like the old "flanking", stick with VCoH, it's your game.
Posts: 522
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 578
Posts: 366
Smaug I know you too buddy, we played in VCoH. When you say "where is flanking" I just laugh because there is tons of flanking in CoH2, and even with smoke grenades it isn't that hard to just re-position your mg42, just like with dealing with regular mortars. Fact of the matter is this thread made me cringe, because I know you rarely play CoH2 and make ludicrous statements such as this. So please, if you like the old "flanking", stick with VCoH, it's your game.
fair enough.. i stop posting in these forums from now on.
"ludicrous statements". These were my observations, you didnt have to be that harsh. cheers
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
fair enough.. i stop posting in these forums from now on.
"ludicrous statements". These were my observations, you didnt have to be that harsh. cheers
Then don't say I don't know what flanking is
Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
The simple answer: COH2 is all about cheese. You won't find the tactical gameplay of vCOH here.
Man, these rose tinted comments never get old. Maybe one of these days people will accept that coh2 is not meant to be vcoh 2.0. If you can't see the tactical side of coh2 then you aren't really paying attention. All of the tactical elements of vcoh exist in coh2. If anything, coh2 is lacking in the strategic department. The current meta restricts teching options (or teching at all tbh) and the linear commander trees limit strategic options. If your going to bash the game, at least try to do it in an accurate manner.
Boring vcoh fanboy posts are boring.
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
Boring vcoh fanboy posts are boring.
I find it hilarious how these guys are still hanging on CoH2 fansites and CoH2 streams even a year after release. Apparently they can't get enough of the thing they hate so much.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Probably 'muricans wet dream.
How well pure folk opening worked against rifles in vcoh? I wouldn't expect much to change on this aspect.
Posts: 252
Man, these rose tinted comments never get old. Maybe one of these days people will accept that coh2 is not meant to be vcoh 2.0. If you can't see the tactical side of coh2 then you aren't really paying attention. All of the tactical elements of vcoh exist in coh2. If anything, coh2 is lacking in the strategic department. The current meta restricts teching options (or teching at all tbh) and the linear commander trees limit strategic options. If your going to bash the game, at least try to do it in an accurate manner.
Boring vcoh fanboy posts are boring.
^dis
Posts: 369
The simple answer: COH2 is all about cheese. You won't find the tactical gameplay of vCOH here.
(zombie)grenspam, Brit blobs, piospam, 1 sec arti, kangaroos... Need I go on?
CoH1 has probably seen way more cheese strats than CoH2.
Posts: 379
Posts: 1702
Yes, infact infantry CAN be flanked. Even vs pure gren spam vs pure conspam there is lots of flanking involved.
2 grenadiers getting shot by conscripts from 2 different directions will lose.
And 2 conscripts vs 2 grenadiers shooting at them from two directions will also lose.
Flanking flanking flanking.
In coh, mg 42 was better than in COH 2, however, volks were much weaker than grens in COH 2.
So its a tradeoff really. Mg 42 is weaker, grens are stronger.
MG 42 is not useless, however , you always need gren support to back it up.
Which is why i feel getting 4 grens is a must this patch, 3 grens 2 support weapons you just get horribly outcapped by the soviets.
Livestreams
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1120623.643+1
- 10.265138.658+2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, praptitourism
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM