Login

russian armor

Hands on Western Fronts Armies

PAGES (75)down
17 Jun 2014, 23:35 PM
#941
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Well, apparently the m5 can reinforce fine with its entire cargo space filled with a quadmount machine gun, fat chance of realistically reinforcing from it. Why wouldnt a 251 flak truck that is its mirror not share this trait?
17 Jun 2014, 23:42 PM
#942
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

Well, apparently the m5 can reinforce fine with its entire cargo space filled with a quadmount machine gun, fat chance of realistically reinforcing from it. Why wouldnt a 251 flak truck that is its mirror not share this trait?


Wait till you see the damage this guy does to infantry before you judge it's utility.
17 Jun 2014, 23:50 PM
#943
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

Well, apparently the m5 can reinforce fine with its entire cargo space filled with a quadmount machine gun, fat chance of realistically reinforcing from it. Why wouldnt a 251 flak truck that is its mirror not share this trait?


because 251 flame half track already mirror it?
17 Jun 2014, 23:53 PM
#944
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053



Wait till you see the damage this guy does to infantry before you judge it's utility.


So its even better than the m5 quadmount is what you are saying? (Just finding it strange why all infantry halftracks, regardless of its armament [excluding 250] can reinforce, and some 251's cannot reinforce like the other 251's)

IMO, i wouldnt call the 251 FHT the quadmount's mirror. It lacks AA as well as range, and i am a big fan of range with suppression.

EDIT: Just realized your WFA avatar, it looks awesome!
17 Jun 2014, 23:54 PM
#945
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2014, 23:50 PMpigsoup


because 251 flame half track already mirror it?


And OKW don't have a flame halftrack.....
18 Jun 2014, 00:43 AM
#946
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Next one up!

http://blogs.companyofheroes.com/category/unit-profiles/


M8 Greyhound. I was surprised, I thought the M20 Utility Car completely replaced it, but it looks like he's not gone yet! And he's a stock unit!
18 Jun 2014, 00:48 AM
#947
avatar of morten1

Posts: 368

Meh fuck canister rounds will relic ever learn?
18 Jun 2014, 00:52 AM
#948
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Anti-blob measures are always welcomed by me. We don't have enough.
18 Jun 2014, 00:52 AM
#949
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

God damn canister without veterancy requirement..it better cost good munitions.
18 Jun 2014, 00:54 AM
#950
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

M20 lays mines, has a bazooka, and an m8 is an m8. Goodbye m20..
18 Jun 2014, 00:55 AM
#951
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

Also is the top gunner upgradeable or inherent?Coz top gunner plus main gun..thats very good AI if we take canister with it.It also has a 37 mm cannon,so not a slouch vs light/medium vehicles i bet.
18 Jun 2014, 00:57 AM
#952
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

crap, I hated that unit in coh1... -.-
18 Jun 2014, 00:57 AM
#953
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

Also is the top gunner upgradeable or inherent?Coz top gunner plus main gun..thats very good AI if we take canister with it.It also has a 37 mm cannon,so not a slouch vs light/medium vehicles i bet.


Its no puma; its not going to take any tank on. Light armor counters light armor and infantry, OKW have lots of both.
18 Jun 2014, 01:00 AM
#954
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705



Its no puma; its not going to take any tank on. Light armor counters light armor and infantry, OKW have lots of both.


Yeah m8 looks really great unit...MG plus main gun ,plus canister vs infantry.
And i think it will beat flak halftrack ..though not any tank.Overall more utility than m20 for sure.Veterancies are a bit meh though.

One thing to note it doesn't have vehicle decrew...
18 Jun 2014, 01:00 AM
#955
avatar of coh2player

Posts: 1571

Did the M8 replace the M20?
18 Jun 2014, 01:03 AM
#956
avatar of austerlitz

Posts: 1705

Did the M8 replace the M20?


Looks like...it has same requirement as m20...but wasn't seen in video...what's going on.Or is it replacing stuart tank?
18 Jun 2014, 01:04 AM
#957
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

So some Americans vehicles can decrew and some dont? Its either all one or all the other. I was actually relieved when i thought there was only a m20; i didnt like the m8, and i can predict future rage for it. I thought bad memories shouldnt be repeated.

I wouldnt think anything is being replaced.
18 Jun 2014, 01:15 AM
#958
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

Might be some changes they are making with the warspoils system and call ins, making them come out of buildings, being tech dependent. Just a guess.
18 Jun 2014, 01:19 AM
#959
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

The M8 only concerns me because if it's T2, Ostheer has no counter, if it's T3, it might suffer T-70 syndrome (great unit, but nobody wants it when StuG's are on the prowl).
2 of 4 Relic postsRelic 18 Jun 2014, 03:05 AM
#960
avatar of Noun

Posts: 454 | Subs: 9



One thing to note it doesn't have vehicle decrew...



Thanks for spotting that, it's an oversight. It's been updated. (The blog not the vehicle).
PAGES (75)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

799 users are online: 799 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49121
Welcome our newest member, Hanra274
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM