My US micro at its best - any tips?
3 Feb 2013, 19:41 PM
#1
1
Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6
[deleted]
3 Feb 2013, 20:00 PM
#2
Posts: 172
I'm not really sure what you want feedback on here. Do you simply want feedback on how to execute those all-in 3rifle nade-attacks, or do you want hints on how to play better overall?
Gonna watch the replay regardless, but I'd ask you to consider that before I reply, because a strategy like that is something you should go for if you see an opening for it, otherwise you're taking quite an unnecessary gamble.
Gonna watch the replay regardless, but I'd ask you to consider that before I reply, because a strategy like that is something you should go for if you see an opening for it, otherwise you're taking quite an unnecessary gamble.
3 Feb 2013, 20:02 PM
#3
Posts: 409 | Subs: 17
This could have been posted in the other topic http://www.coh2.org/topic/1652/coh-ask-the-strategists.
Anyways can you be more specific?
Anyways can you be more specific?
3 Feb 2013, 20:07 PM
#4
1
Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6
[deleted]
3 Feb 2013, 20:23 PM
#5
Posts: 172
Ah crap, can't get CoH to work on this computer so I can't watch the replay.
Anyways. The point we were trying to make was that giving feedback based on what's essentially an all-in, especially all-ins that went well, isn't something you're going to get much out of. There's not necessarily much you could have done better in the scenario that was provided, but there are probably several mistakes your opponents made that could have been pointed out. If there were any mistakes worth mentioning from your side, they probably weren't during your successful flank.
And, honestly, micro isn't what separates the good from the great in CoH. Making smart decisions with your teching and your units is what separates the good from the great. If you have the basics of the game down and want to improve, your first priority should be understanding that process of decisionmaking, and most importantly why a given choice is good or bad in a given situation.
Anyways. The point we were trying to make was that giving feedback based on what's essentially an all-in, especially all-ins that went well, isn't something you're going to get much out of. There's not necessarily much you could have done better in the scenario that was provided, but there are probably several mistakes your opponents made that could have been pointed out. If there were any mistakes worth mentioning from your side, they probably weren't during your successful flank.
And, honestly, micro isn't what separates the good from the great in CoH. Making smart decisions with your teching and your units is what separates the good from the great. If you have the basics of the game down and want to improve, your first priority should be understanding that process of decisionmaking, and most importantly why a given choice is good or bad in a given situation.
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
SHOUT IT OUT!
Rosbone: This has been a paid for announcement from The People for the betterment of Coh Society.
Last Thursday, 20:11 PM
Last Thursday, 20:11 PM
Rosbone: And at a point when they need to have as many positives as they can. Instead they drop the ball and beg people for upvotes. You wouldnt need begging if you just did your jobs, like ever.
Last Thursday, 20:08 PM
Last Thursday, 20:08 PM
Rosbone: They put out new maps and increase the chance you get the new maps! Great idea! Thanks! Now its been 2 months of getting the same map over and over and over. How do they always fail themselves. Turn a positive into a negative everytime.
Last Thursday, 20:07 PM
Last Thursday, 20:07 PM
Rosbone: Seriously now, how is Relic still around. They cant do anything at all without F'ing it up.
Last Thursday, 20:05 PM
Last Thursday, 20:05 PM
GenMe: Its pointless even recording wins or losses in coh or any other RTS, they are being maphacked to death
Last Wednesday, 05:16 AM
Last Wednesday, 05:16 AM
aerafield: But make no mistake, this is not supposed to be a "DAK OP" rant. The whole game CoH3 is designed in a way so that stupid players can perform well and reach high ladder spots. Low effort, maximum reward strategies are everywhere
Last Tuesday, 22:51 PM
Last Tuesday, 22:51 PM
aerafield: Yeah I was gonna say, you clearly never saw the 10 IQ 10 APM blobbers roaming around on CoH3's top 20 ladders as DAK. Blobbing VSL Pgrens near the camouflage truck
Last Tuesday, 22:47 PM
Last Tuesday, 22:47 PM
Lady Xenarra: Nvm, I was wrong about VSL. Ultra efficient blob smashers go brrrrrr
Last Tuesday, 21:31 PM
Last Tuesday, 21:31 PM
Rosbone: 4v4 has enough players or Wespe blobs but 3v3 doesnt? Some good axis teams are only playing 4v4?
16 Jan 2025, 15:31 PM
16 Jan 2025, 15:31 PM
Rosbone: @aerafield What is up with the Coh3 win rates? 4v4 1500 has axis at 57% winrate. Same setting in 3v3 is allies at 52% win rate.
16 Jan 2025, 15:30 PM
16 Jan 2025, 15:30 PM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Couldn't spam pumas, he ragequit after 4 mins. Told his teammates they sucked and disappeared into a puff of smoke
09 Jan 2025, 00:55 AM
09 Jan 2025, 00:55 AM
Livestreams
204 | |||||
46 | |||||
33 | |||||
26 | |||||
6 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.855.944+26
- 2.843223.791+6
- 3.1103405.731+8
- 4.38861.864+1
- 5.657233.738-1
- 6.292157.650-1
- 7.282108.723+33
- 8.308114.730+4
- 9.11942.739+6
- 10.370283.567+3
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
13
Download
1289
Board Info
510 users are online:
510 guests
1 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
55 posts in the last month
4 posts in the last week
55 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51042
Welcome our newest member, banickb72
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, banickb72
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM