My US micro at its best - any tips?
3 Feb 2013, 19:41 PM
#1
1
Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6
[deleted]
3 Feb 2013, 20:00 PM
#2
Posts: 172
I'm not really sure what you want feedback on here. Do you simply want feedback on how to execute those all-in 3rifle nade-attacks, or do you want hints on how to play better overall?
Gonna watch the replay regardless, but I'd ask you to consider that before I reply, because a strategy like that is something you should go for if you see an opening for it, otherwise you're taking quite an unnecessary gamble.
Gonna watch the replay regardless, but I'd ask you to consider that before I reply, because a strategy like that is something you should go for if you see an opening for it, otherwise you're taking quite an unnecessary gamble.
3 Feb 2013, 20:02 PM
#3
Posts: 409 | Subs: 17
This could have been posted in the other topic http://www.coh2.org/topic/1652/coh-ask-the-strategists.
Anyways can you be more specific?
Anyways can you be more specific?
3 Feb 2013, 20:07 PM
#4
1
Posts: 2439 | Subs: 6
[deleted]
3 Feb 2013, 20:23 PM
#5
Posts: 172
Ah crap, can't get CoH to work on this computer so I can't watch the replay.
Anyways. The point we were trying to make was that giving feedback based on what's essentially an all-in, especially all-ins that went well, isn't something you're going to get much out of. There's not necessarily much you could have done better in the scenario that was provided, but there are probably several mistakes your opponents made that could have been pointed out. If there were any mistakes worth mentioning from your side, they probably weren't during your successful flank.
And, honestly, micro isn't what separates the good from the great in CoH. Making smart decisions with your teching and your units is what separates the good from the great. If you have the basics of the game down and want to improve, your first priority should be understanding that process of decisionmaking, and most importantly why a given choice is good or bad in a given situation.
Anyways. The point we were trying to make was that giving feedback based on what's essentially an all-in, especially all-ins that went well, isn't something you're going to get much out of. There's not necessarily much you could have done better in the scenario that was provided, but there are probably several mistakes your opponents made that could have been pointed out. If there were any mistakes worth mentioning from your side, they probably weren't during your successful flank.
And, honestly, micro isn't what separates the good from the great in CoH. Making smart decisions with your teching and your units is what separates the good from the great. If you have the basics of the game down and want to improve, your first priority should be understanding that process of decisionmaking, and most importantly why a given choice is good or bad in a given situation.
PAGES (1)
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
33 | |||||
18 | |||||
2 | |||||
164 | |||||
16 | |||||
4 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
804 users are online:
804 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM