Login

russian armor

April 24th Patch Notes Discussion

PAGES (17)down
23 Apr 2014, 19:15 PM
#61
avatar of MadeMan

Posts: 304

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 18:51 PMShazz

StuG and SU76 changes are a bit perplexing. These two units were already pretty bad and changes on paper seem to make them worse, but will have to see how they synergize with all the other changes.

I was surprised too, mainly at the armour decrease. SU76 did get a penetration buff though, which is very nice in my mind. Considering you can build so many, having them bombard infantry to the stone age, and then mobbing up to attack armour will be more effective too. Maybe they'll be more of a glass cannon style unit, or even just more spammable since they have better offensive capability now?
23 Apr 2014, 19:17 PM
#62
avatar of Senseo1990

Posts: 317

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 19:10 PMKatitof


I know, right??

Hingie on official forums already got meltdown.


Hm doesent seem like that to me. He just asked a good question concerning the new range penetration system and is a bit concerned about Panthers.

Scared? Maybe. Meltdown? Naaah :P
23 Apr 2014, 19:20 PM
#63
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8



Hm doesent seem like that to me. He just asked a good question concerning the new range penetration system and is a bit concerned about Panthers.

Scared? Maybe. Meltdown? Naaah :P

Read earlier posts :)

About panther, nothing really will change except with fights with KVs(which already were bad in AT fights) and against IS-2, which will now fiend off panther much more effectively.

I just want to play it and see KV-1.
23 Apr 2014, 19:29 PM
#64
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

The small weapons profile adjustments seem pretty bang on. PQ posted some sexy charts and stuff.
23 Apr 2014, 19:31 PM
#65
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

We should wait to plat the patch but:

the howitzer changes seem like a flat out nerf. Which was the last thing these units needed. What was wrong with destroying someones base with artillery? It's barely useful against moving targets if your opponent had a brain and did not blob up against a player with a howitzer.


Copypasta.


Changing a bit the subject: no one said anything regarding the Howitzers ?

I hate the mechanic of you are fucked without an offmap because it´s sitting inside the enemy base and recon + offmap equal easy goodbye howitzer. The thing that many german doctrines have either cheap (light arty) or abundant offmaps in several good commanders is something a bit annoying.

With this changes, how would it play having artillery with less range but being cheaper?

I hope this is just a first step.

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 18:08 PMAbdul
It seems there are some good improvements to infantry. Engineers cost less, scout car cost less and has more health and penetration. Cons can do more damage. Guards cost less and upgrade for less.


Brace yourselves...M3 + Engineer + Guard spam is comming. Huehuehue.


23 Apr 2014, 19:33 PM
#66
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

Howitzer's were already questionable. The value proposition just went down further on them. No biggy.
23 Apr 2014, 19:35 PM
#67
avatar of Tristan44

Posts: 915

Exactly! Ugh!! I love all on map arty and now it's not efficient whatsoever.
23 Apr 2014, 19:39 PM
#68
avatar of Abdul

Posts: 896



Brace yourselves...M3 + Engineer + Guard spam is comming. Huehuehue.




u forgot sniper
23 Apr 2014, 19:40 PM
#69
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

Exactly! Ugh!! I love all on map arty and now it's not efficient whatsoever.


It's effective *only* if you know what commander the opposing player has picked. The value proposition remains low though. Using a rocket truck has the same results but is cheaper and mobile. I hope relic address's Arty in the future.
23 Apr 2014, 19:41 PM
#70
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Brace yourselves...M3 + Engineer + Guard spam is comming. Huehuehue.

In case you haven't played over the last month, its already here because its the only viable strat :P
23 Apr 2014, 19:44 PM
#71
avatar of DarthBong420

Posts: 381

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 19:40 PMNapalm


It's effective *only* if you know what commander the opposing player has picked. The value proposition remains low though. Using a rocket truck has the same results but is cheaper and mobile. I hope relic address's Arty in the future.

they are waiting for Brits to sell more Royal Arty Commanders.
23 Apr 2014, 19:45 PM
#72
avatar of ferrozoica

Posts: 208

The tank changes look very nice indeed. Looking forward to trying them out!
23 Apr 2014, 19:45 PM
#73
avatar of Kreatiir

Posts: 2819

Arty was fine..
It has an easy counter with katties or long range mortars , kv 8 rush,..
I dont like the nerfs.
I am eager to play, but I fear for the arty.
23 Apr 2014, 19:51 PM
#74
avatar of Sedghammer

Posts: 179

Looks great, can't wait to try it out!
23 Apr 2014, 20:09 PM
#75
avatar of MajorasLiepa

Posts: 105

I like that M5 now going to came much faster.yay.
23 Apr 2014, 20:10 PM
#76
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

Woooooooooooooooow nice german nerf, extremely ultra good buff to the ISU152, now he has better penetration and same health than Elef. Prepare your anus to see more ISU152's, you dont have elefant? say GG xD



elephant pen: 400. vs. isu 152 pen: 230.

400 > 230...

as a proud asian, i am personally offended that a literate person can be this bad at math.

ps. patch looks nice. can't wait to try it.
23 Apr 2014, 20:13 PM
#77
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 20:10 PMpigsoup



elephant pen: 400. vs. isu 152 pen: 230.

400 > 230...

as a proud asian, i am personally offended that a literate person can be this bad at math.

ps. patch looks nice. can't wait to try it.


Figured some smartass would point this out. I wasnt comparing the pens of both tanks, only the health.
23 Apr 2014, 20:20 PM
#78
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

I want to try su76 spam now.
23 Apr 2014, 20:22 PM
#79
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2



Figured some smartass would point this out. I wasnt comparing the pens of both tanks, only the health.


"better penetration and same health"

im sorry. i have no idea where i got ideas about penetration from. it must be one of those quarter age alzheimer people talk about. or it must be my damn restless leg syndrome interfering my brain activity.
23 Apr 2014, 20:28 PM
#80
avatar of TNrg

Posts: 640

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 18:53 PMKyle


I mean for god sake G43 is a long range Rifle, WITH SCOPE. I mean SCOPE for better aiming at far range, not to be god as medium and close.



I think if the G43 grens have scopes then it's just lazyness on Relic's part to make a different G43 model without the scope for grens and using the sniper's G43 model :D
PAGES (17)down
3 users are browsing this thread: 3 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

320 users are online: 320 guests
0 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
35 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49217
Welcome our newest member, Hodnefield01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM