Posts: 184
yes the rifle nade has become really strong after the patch from what I can tell. It's very common for a gren to force retreat a maxim with it.
Posts: 17
Posts: 1162
It was pretty nice before. As if germans needed more reasons to spam Grens.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
There should be a tutorial on how to make fair and balanced polls, offering options for everyone. So far I have seen mostly biased polls on this site.
This applies to both Soviet and Ostheer fanboys.
Posts: 525
There should be a tutorial on how to make fair and balanced polls, offering options for everyone. So far I have seen mostly biased polls on this site.
This applies to both Soviet and Ostheer fanboys.
2 
Posts: 2181
As opposed to the oorah and a molotov against an MG. Come on, there are problems with the soviet faction but these complaints are getting more and more ludicrous by the day.
Posts: 184
There should be a tutorial on how to make fair and balanced polls, offering options for everyone. So far I have seen mostly biased polls on this site.
This applies to both Soviet and Ostheer fanboys.
Posts: 1637
Agreed, both polls ask such a loaded question I thought it was election season.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Posts: 879
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Posts: 1617
I like the new assymetrical balance of long-range grens vs cons and penals.
The problem is grens are too effective at long range. So my brief list:
1) Slightly nerf long-range gren damage so cons have a chance OR increase default Molotov range. Can't do both, or Sov will be totally OP again.
3) Increase M3 long-range DPS and nerf the close range if you want. I really have been trying to use it at range. IT DOES NOT WORK, like that guy's video shows it does no damage at max range and any closer, it gets eaten alive by pios or faust.
After that we can look at LMG and G43 efficiency once vetted. I don't think they are a big deal unvetted, but vet 2 is atrocious.
Posts: 1617
Or if not buffing the conscripts, they should be a bit cheaper, around 210mp to better reflect their role and some better veterancy could help them.
Posts: 1702
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Or if not buffing the conscriptsm they should be a bit cheaper, around 210mp to better reflect their role and some better veterancy could help them.
Posts: 184
I voted no, but conscripts and CE should not be equal. I support the idea of making conscripts cheaper. And makes sense too.
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
Posts: 1637
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 525
I voted "no," but I strongly disagree with your first point that cons "need" to be even with grens. Didn't read the rest after that one.
Posts: 1702
Why wouldn't they be equal,isn't that the point in balance?
 |
|
|
78 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
165 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
