That's all you wanted to do anyway. You've made several posts like this that are mostly just presumption, wild speculations and an excuse for you to act like a know it all contrarian.
Why don't you whine about the graphics, historical authenticity (lol), and features when it actually comes out and your complaints might have some actual substance.
Listen here:
I only made a 100% correct presumption that Tiger I tanks would be incorporated into a NA strategy game on the basis that lelic is completely oblivious to basic ww2 lore. Turns out I was correct.
The poster that blatantly ad hominem'd me and my history knowledge made a host of assumptions that I proved above
that even if they turn out to be true, they are completely dumb and misrepresentative of the historical field the game wants to emulate.
That's all I did. I personally could not care less about COH3's authenticity since I know for a fact it's going to be meh. But putting Tiger I tanks in NA is the equivalent of putting AK47s in Stalingrad USSR. Sure, Kalashnikov lived there and there are surviving sketches of AK47's being put into some test back then but where they
actually used my most Sov soldiers? Fuck no. That's why it's not historically authentic to put them there.
I hope you know what I mean.