The only thing which is unfair about ST nerf is that AVRE didnt get same CP\price nerf.
It did got price nerf
Fuel cost from 160 to 175.
But yes, CP remains at 9 while ST's CP is nerfed to 10.
Posts: 472
The only thing which is unfair about ST nerf is that AVRE didnt get same CP\price nerf.
Posts: 2243
The only thing which is unfair about ST nerf is that AVRE didnt get same CP\price nerf.
Posts: 213
its the brit bonus. didn ut reailze it yet? most things brits got is a better / superior version from other factions.
Start with teching (no building with pio etc)
IS is a better rifles these days,
best lv in game
very early AEC to counter most stuff easily which has armor execpt mediums/puma (even there very usefully) in this time
best turle mechanics in game
got units which other faction only with doc
powerfull offmaps and arty options
etc etc
even a Sturmtiger equivalent was given to them
Posts: 37
Now that the Sturmtiger has been nerfed to oblivion can it please 1 shot a t34 again or at least increase its deceleration while firing so it doesn't take so long to shoot, because in its current state its way worse than the AVRE
Posts: 2243
I don't even use the AVRE cause i think it's silly , I mean is this not the same as saying why my machine gun can't be a MG42? Cause it's way better then anything i have for that price or the panther that clearly outperforms most TD's with that front armour , why can't i have that aswell?
Actually let me beg really quick "Why does my vickers underperform so much????? Look at that MG42 it's the best thing ever made why do i need to have crappy vickers why can't i pin anyone in 0.2 seconds? PLEASE BUFF , PLEASE BUFF!
Posts: 2243
cmon dude, brits have no bonus, they probably have the least amount of questionable (imba) units/mechanics atm.
Puma, t70 and 222 are all more effective than the Aec, having no snare makes sections worse than rifle
About Sturmtiger: Let this unit be underwhelming. Retarded unit with dumb design
Posts: 37
oh boi...the vickers is in most fight the winner when fighting.
since it has more range and mostly the same pin point and more dmg...or take aim... must be fail by you when you think the vickers is worse.
combin this with the much better infantry and UC at start ----must be really your own learn2play issue to lose fights to ost
Posts: 772
why do you think a mainline infntry need AT nades? its even better on much cheaper pio sqauds...which can nade and even take 2 handheld AT to own by itsself most armor ---even mediums pretty often
IS are better than rifles these days....
Posts: 2243
nobody needs AT nades, until a t70 or 222 rolls up in your face and starts blasting you, lmao.
Posts: 772
right..brits dont neet at on mainline since the AEC comes at mostly the same time like 222.
Posts: 1096
its the brit bonus. didn ut reailze it yet? most things brits got is a better / superior version from other factions.
Start with teching (no building with pio etc)
IS is a better rifles these days,
best lv in game
very early AEC to counter most stuff easily which has armor execpt mediums/puma (even there very usefully) in this time
best turle mechanics in game
got units which other faction only with doc
powerfull offmaps and arty options
etc etc
even a Sturmtiger equivalent was given to them
Posts: 1158
The only thing which is unfair about ST nerf is that AVRE didnt get same CP\price nerf.
Posts: 1289
Asymetric balance
Posts: 472
why do you think a mainline infntry need AT nades? its even better on much cheaper pio sqauds...which can nade and even take 2 handheld AT to own by itsself most armor ---even mediums pretty often
IS are better than rifles these days....
Posts: 472
combin this with the much better infantry and UC at start ----must be really your own learn2play issue to lose fights to ost
Posts: 321
Why not give pio a AT nade & remove it from the gren? That would be awesone buff to the OST according to your logic right?
98 | |||||
33 | |||||
11 | |||||
5 | |||||
2 | |||||
32 | |||||
11 | |||||
5 | |||||
3 | |||||
3 |