Some Talks For USF's Armors.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 14:11 PMNorthWeapon

Regarding exploit, if you mean USF player X leaves his m4 Sherman and then player Y enters the Sherman to upgrade it so player X can have an upgraded Sherman, then I think teamwork should be rewarded. I have the same opinion for the Vickers K drop. I think intentionally blocking teamwork for Vickers K drop and M4 Sherman upgrade is babysitting players too much and limiting creativity. If players have enough coordination to do such things, I think it is a great feature of the game and not a bug.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 14:11 PMNorthWeapon

I think trying so hard to figure out all the exploits and try to block it so players don't use it takes too much time and is too much babysitting. Things like multiple sturmtiger exploit, or giving WC51 to Assault Sections. There are 1 million "exploits", and I think it is silly to go after all of them. They are rare and unintended features that require exceptional effort and coordination to accomplish.

I think starting production of a weaker default version of a unit to later upgrade
it is the point of an upgrade. Upgrades are for improving the stats of a unit after its default version has been purchased. We purchase a Obersoldaten and then upgrade it with STG44s to make them better. We purchase a Panzer IVJ to upgrade them with commander ability. I think it is intentional.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 14:25 PMVipper

You have not seen a single argument explaining why the Dozer should be an upgrade and not a separate unit.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 16:55 PMTygrys

We haven't seen a single argument from you why the dozer shouldn't be an upgrade.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 18:20 PMpvtgooner

And you won't. He makes a claim and when someone says "explain pls" he asks you to explain why you think it isnt.

But I'll take a crack at explaining why it should be retained. Diversity. USF doesnt have the amount of armor to choose from that other factions do, why should we be removing more armor choices, doctrinal ones at that, from a faction that already has the smallest lineup of mediums.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 18:43 PMTygrys

I know how he "argues" on these forums. I'm just waiting for what stupid shit he'll come up with this time.

And of course the dozer should stay. US has exactly one tank which isn't paper thin and it's doctrinal and stuck in a singular doctrine. If anyone wants to get rid of dozer blades then they need to be replaced with a dedicated damage sponge tank like a Jumbo, which obviously isn't happening because there will be no new models added to this game.

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 19:11 PMNorthWeapon

1. Upgrade can be exploited by vehicle crew hopping/switching

2. Paying less fuel for a tank that is actually more powerful than m4 Sherman

3. Bundled 2 abilities in 1 is bad

Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2021, 20:20 PMTheGentlemenTroll

Getting an excellent premium medium is already a good deal for a doctrine slot. But for mechanized ontop of that they get a buff to one of the best stock medium tanks in the game as well. Seems to be way too much for a single doctrine slot imo.