IS-2 is weak until 2 stars. Need play very carefully and gain exp.
How does it become good at vet-2?
Posts: 378
IS-2 is weak until 2 stars. Need play very carefully and gain exp.
Posts: 1003
How does it become good at vet-2?
Posts: 378
IS-2 Heavy Tank
Vet 1:
Unlocks the "OF-471 Fragmentation Shell" ability.
Vet 2:
+50% weapon rotation speed.
+25% range of fire.
+20% accuracy.
Vet 3:
+30% reload speed.
+20% rotation speed.
+20% maximum speed.
+20% ac/de-celeration.
Posts: 1273
Posts: 956
Posts: 378
IS-2 exists? Huh and I thought it was a fat T-34/85. It's not intimidating except vs lone AT guns and its appearance frequently means a bigger, meaner Tiger brother appears soon (lacking fuel for TDs). At which point it might as well give up.
Posts: 956
What do you mean? the t-34-85 is really good(in my personal experience), esp against wehr p-IV. Soviet is my most played faction also.
Posts: 570 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1515
T-34/85 is a very good medium. IS-2 is basically a fat version with better pen and armor but slooooow and expensive. Not worth its price tag, but that's the state of heavies in general these days. Except maybe KV-1/Churchill which are kinda special heavy armor/hp, weak gun affairs.
Posts: 213
Tiger is still viable. I still don't see a 3v3 game where there isn't one. People mostly complained about the Tiger nerf in the Heavy nerf patch, because it used to be batshit OP. Basically Tiger went from OP to normal. Pershing went from fragile infantry killer to just fragile. IS-2 went from OK to "meh". KT was not touched, but outside of 3v3 and 4v4, it's not really a menace. Sure, a supported KT can turn the tide of the game and net you a win, but only if it's supported well.
Most people, even in top 50, still buy KT, bring it to the frontline SOLO and then complain how it's completely UP and useless because it couldn't solo 3 AT guns and TDs and infantry.... since you know, if the tank is expensive, it has to solo win everything.
KV-1 and Churchill are still great heavies. Weak guns but high survivability.
KV2 is in a league of it's own. A really special tank.
Brummbar is also a special tank and one of the best stock heavy tanks.
Overall, if IS-2 needs anything, it's a slight rework of it's weaknesses and strengths. Make it slow and non-agile but increase survivability and damage output. But again, it's quite difficult to rework such heavies.
Pershing is ez. It only needs a slight armour buff (to 290 or 300) and that's it.
KT needs nothing
Tiger might need a slight buff in turret rotation, but that's also it.
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Posts: 155
Posts: 103
Other than that I really don't have many problems with the IS-2 other than its horrendous pathfinding sometimes.
Posts: 999 | Subs: 1
My issue is the lack of consistency. I also find the vet 1 ability to be very underwhelming, I don't think I've ever seen it get a wipe all the times I've used it though it does heavily damage whatever it directly hits. Takes a long time to fire too, which I understand because it would be silly if you could just walk up to an AT gun and instantly use an ability.
I feel like it should do more though, increase the ammo cost even and make it something that can reliably punish a blob. It already has the warning indicator when you're firing and it takes a few seconds before it fires so there's plenty of time for an aware player to avoid it.
Other than that I really don't have many problems with the IS-2 other than its horrendous pathfinding sometimes.
Posts: 810
Posts: 5279
The is-2's gun caliber is 122mm, so why is it only 160 dmg?
The 88mm King Tiger's damage is 240
And is-2 also lost its personality after the armor was nerfed.
My solution)
armor 340->360
Canon dmg 160->240
Canon range 40->45
Cost 640/230 -> 720/230
OF-471 DMG 120->160
7 | |||||
1 | |||||
21 | |||||
10 | |||||
9 | |||||
6 | |||||
5 | |||||
5 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |