Should we let Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun buff?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 3

I believe that the Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun should be buffed because it has a few DPS against infantry and buffing it would be a great infantry support tank tbh.

Posts: 3

26 Feb 2021, 02:40 AMRHL

I believe that the Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun should be buffed because it has a few DPS against infantry and buffing it would be a great infantry support tank tbh.

Wrong thread pls delete sorry mods

Posts: 615

Churchill has a sten gun?

Playercard of NorthWeapon

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

COH2 YouTube Channel

I'm making a videogame based off of CoH2

Multi Quote

Posts: 45

26 Feb 2021, 03:43 AMNorthWeapon

Churchill has a sten gun?

Yeah, at vet 1 the crew fires Stens out of the side hatches. Does around 5 DPS at 10 range and under.

Playercard of T.R. sidewinder

1v1: P	streak: + 9
1v1: P	streak: - 1
3v3: P	streak: + 1	with flyingpancake, & Toad In A Sandwich
3v3: P	streak: + 1	with flyingpancake, & Toad In A Sandwich

Multi Quote

Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3

26 Feb 2021, 02:40 AMRHL

I believe that the Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun should be buffed because it has a few DPS against infantry and buffing it would be a great infantry support tank tbh.

the churchill also gets a pintle-mount vickers at vet 1 with the upcoming patch, so no need for that anymore

Posts: 571

26 Feb 2021, 12:22 PMaerafield

the churchill also gets a pintle-mount vickers at vet 1 with the upcoming patch, so no need for that anymore

Does that apply to Crocodile as well?
(Please say no)

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2021, 06:44 AMmortiferum

Does that apply to Crocodile as well?
(Please say no)

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

They should have just let vet 1 give a slight buff to co-ax, hull and maybe side gun, instead of a 2dps pintle.

Posts: 416 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2021, 11:39 AMSupport Sapper

They should have just let vet 1 give a slight buff to co-ax, hull and maybe side gun, instead of a 2dps pintle.

I completely agree. That would read better, since other tank pintles are decent. I also don't like the look of so many armor ports open and crewmen exposed.
The Churchill pintle is ok for a modder's "we added this because this is all we can do" type feature, but I think it should have stayed that way.

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2021, 19:08 PMRoastinGhost

I completely agree. That would read better, since other tank pintles are decent. I also don't like the look of so many armor ports open and crewmen exposed.
The Churchill pintle is ok for a modder's "we added this because this is all we can do" type feature, but I think it should have stayed that way.

The pintle itself isn't look very bad but when two out of three guys in the turret pop out on top at the same time, it just odd.

Posts: 1594

4 Mar 2021, 05:38 AMSupport Sapper

The pintle itself isn't look very bad but when two out of three guys in the turret pop out on top at the same time, it just odd.

Given that the pintle is locked to turret rotation, there's really little reason for it to exist at all, honestly. All it is, functionally, is a second coaxial MG.

I agree with the previous suggestion that the Coaxial MG just get a buff to its DPS equal to the DPS of the new "pintle" at vet1. The only reason I'd say its worth keeping the new pintle is if it gains normal pintle rotation.