Should we let Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun buff?

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 3

I believe that the Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun should be buffed because it has a few DPS against infantry and buffing it would be a great infantry support tank tbh.

Posts: 3

26 Feb 2021, 02:40 AMRHL

I believe that the Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun should be buffed because it has a few DPS against infantry and buffing it would be a great infantry support tank tbh.

Wrong thread pls delete sorry mods

Posts: 615

Churchill has a sten gun?

Playercard of NorthWeapon

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P

COH2 YouTube Channel

I'm making a videogame based off of CoH2

Multi Quote

Posts: 45

26 Feb 2021, 03:43 AMNorthWeapon

Churchill has a sten gun?

Yeah, at vet 1 the crew fires Stens out of the side hatches. Does around 5 DPS at 10 range and under.

Playercard of T.R. sidewinder

1v1: P	streak: + 9
1v1: P	streak: - 1
3v3: P	streak: + 1	with flyingpancake, & Toad In A Sandwich
3v3: P	streak: + 1	with flyingpancake, & Toad In A Sandwich

Multi Quote

Posts: 3042 | Subs: 3

26 Feb 2021, 02:40 AMRHL

I believe that the Vet 1 Churchill Sten gun should be buffed because it has a few DPS against infantry and buffing it would be a great infantry support tank tbh.

the churchill also gets a pintle-mount vickers at vet 1 with the upcoming patch, so no need for that anymore

Posts: 571

26 Feb 2021, 12:22 PMaerafield

the churchill also gets a pintle-mount vickers at vet 1 with the upcoming patch, so no need for that anymore

Does that apply to Crocodile as well?
(Please say no)

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2021, 06:44 AMmortiferum

Does that apply to Crocodile as well?
(Please say no)

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

They should have just let vet 1 give a slight buff to co-ax, hull and maybe side gun, instead of a 2dps pintle.

Posts: 416 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2021, 11:39 AMSupport Sapper

They should have just let vet 1 give a slight buff to co-ax, hull and maybe side gun, instead of a 2dps pintle.

I completely agree. That would read better, since other tank pintles are decent. I also don't like the look of so many armor ports open and crewmen exposed.
The Churchill pintle is ok for a modder's "we added this because this is all we can do" type feature, but I think it should have stayed that way.

Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

3 Mar 2021, 19:08 PMRoastinGhost

I completely agree. That would read better, since other tank pintles are decent. I also don't like the look of so many armor ports open and crewmen exposed.
The Churchill pintle is ok for a modder's "we added this because this is all we can do" type feature, but I think it should have stayed that way.

The pintle itself isn't look very bad but when two out of three guys in the turret pop out on top at the same time, it just odd.

Posts: 1594

4 Mar 2021, 05:38 AMSupport Sapper

The pintle itself isn't look very bad but when two out of three guys in the turret pop out on top at the same time, it just odd.

Given that the pintle is locked to turret rotation, there's really little reason for it to exist at all, honestly. All it is, functionally, is a second coaxial MG.

I agree with the previous suggestion that the Coaxial MG just get a buff to its DPS equal to the DPS of the new "pintle" at vet1. The only reason I'd say its worth keeping the new pintle is if it gains normal pintle rotation.

New topic

New Reply

0 user is browsing this thread:

Subscribe to thread

SHOUT IT OUT!

OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
Today, 11:18 AM

Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
Today, 04:30 AM

Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
Today, 04:29 AM

Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
Today, 04:07 AM

theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
Today, 04:00 AM

theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
Today, 03:59 AM

theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
Today, 03:54 AM

theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
Today, 03:52 AM

theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
Today, 03:52 AM

theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
Today, 03:51 AM

KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
Last Friday, 19:14 PM

OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
Last Thursday, 16:35 PM

aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
Last Thursday, 13:33 PM

Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
Last Thursday, 12:13 PM

OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked!

Last Thursday, 10:49 AM

Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
Last Thursday, 03:20 AM

Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive.

05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM

Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM

Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM

Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Ladders Top 10