Relics Legendary Team Game Matchups
11 Feb 2021, 10:54 AM
#21
Posts: 163
From what I've heard the longer the match making queue time go the bigger it search, so the best is the lowest queue time
17 Feb 2021, 13:08 PM
#22
Posts: 830 | Subs: 3
From what I've heard the longer the match making queue time go the bigger it search, so the best is the lowest queue time
Yes, exactly.
As the computer searches for an opponent it may begin to broaden the search if no opponent is found. Playing Company of Heroes 2 at times when there are less players online, may result in a greater chance of getting a match against a player whose Elo+ rating doesn’t match your own.
cf. http://www.companyofheroes.com/blog/2014/09/19/matchmaking-in-company-of-heroes-2-and-elo
1 Mar 2021, 05:12 AM
#23
Posts: 2144 | Subs: 2
Dear Relic,
I think you have a problem with your match maker. I am not sure what it is. But we got rekt really hard on this game. Maybe someone could look into why we got completely destroyed and required 17 hours of reconstructive anal surgery.
Thank You,
A Fan
For reference there are 12059 OST 4v4 players currently.
I think you have a problem with your match maker. I am not sure what it is. But we got rekt really hard on this game. Maybe someone could look into why we got completely destroyed and required 17 hours of reconstructive anal surgery.
Thank You,
A Fan
For reference there are 12059 OST 4v4 players currently.
8 Mar 2021, 11:14 AM
#24
Posts: 163
Dear Relic,
I think you have a problem with your match maker. I am not sure what it is. But we got rekt really hard on this game. Maybe someone could look into why we got completely destroyed and required 17 hours of reconstructive anal surgery.
Thank You,
A Fan
For reference there are 12059 OST 4v4 players currently.
They are probably queueing for a long time, and with the recent patch many casual players dislike the changes/okw changes and quit for a time.
16 Mar 2021, 04:47 AM
#25
Posts: 960
#224 (me) and #1100 vs. #20 and #1000
How does that make sense? It certainly wasn't a fun match. At this point, the only way to 'play' is by cancelling and re-queuing every minute or two, to prevent the ELO range from getting too high. Still better than the weekend when it matched me (several times) against top-100 pre-made teams as a random #250 player.
edit: #234 (me) and #760 vs. #17 and #360
edit2: 2 days later I get this - #276 (me) and #380 vs. #144 and #211. This seems reasonable, until you notice that the #144 player is the exact same player as the #20 and #17 from earlier. Even worse, this was 1-2 minute queue. Effectively, there's no reason to play if specific people are on, because the MM will assume that a #250 player can take on a top-20 player.
How does that make sense? It certainly wasn't a fun match. At this point, the only way to 'play' is by cancelling and re-queuing every minute or two, to prevent the ELO range from getting too high. Still better than the weekend when it matched me (several times) against top-100 pre-made teams as a random #250 player.
edit: #234 (me) and #760 vs. #17 and #360
edit2: 2 days later I get this - #276 (me) and #380 vs. #144 and #211. This seems reasonable, until you notice that the #144 player is the exact same player as the #20 and #17 from earlier. Even worse, this was 1-2 minute queue. Effectively, there's no reason to play if specific people are on, because the MM will assume that a #250 player can take on a top-20 player.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
3 Apr 2021, 20:05 PM
#26
Posts: 960
Me (#248) and #125 vs. #1 and #7 as a pre-made.
Stop wasting my time, please.
edit: Me (#250) and #100 vs. 1630 and Unranked... I only had to build 2 squads. That wasn't fun for anyone.
Stop wasting my time, please.
edit: Me (#250) and #100 vs. 1630 and Unranked... I only had to build 2 squads. That wasn't fun for anyone.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
6 Apr 2021, 19:47 PM
#27
Posts: 2144 | Subs: 2
Not sure who won this match. For some weird reason I think Axis probably did. Just a hunch. Maybe its just something I ate.
12 Apr 2021, 01:14 AM
#28
Posts: 359
Thank you matchmaker, very cool
27 May 2021, 20:58 PM
#29
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36
Pls all your stuff is nothing...
That is 20.389 on allies side vs. 484 axis.
Also 7k 2AT premade means probably even lower in random rank
That is 20.389 on allies side vs. 484 axis.
Also 7k 2AT premade means probably even lower in random rank
27 May 2021, 22:01 PM
#30
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
imo there should just be an option "teamgame" which combines 3v3 and 4v4
or scrap one of those modes entirely
or scrap one of those modes entirely
6 Jun 2021, 05:49 AM
#31
Posts: 960
Took a 2 month break and came back right after the free weekend; might not have been the best choice.
Me (440), 341, 1093 vs. 101, 673, 56
Me (440), Unranked (~5k), Unranked (~2.5k) vs. 163, 79, 134
Me (440), 148, 634 vs. 3x Unranked
Me (440), 351, 380 vs. 2x Unranked, 2500
Me (440), 2x Unranked vs. Unranked, 252, 206
It's not a good sign when getting a bunch of new players means the experience for everyone is significantly worse. I don't understand how there's still no "rank range limit" system in place. There's no reason a ~5k/unranked player should ever be facing top-100s; it's an awful experience for everyone involved.
edit:
Me (476 now), 648, Unranked vs. 176, 207, 114
Seriously, this is virtually unplayable; I haven't had a fair match in days. I quit for 2 months because of this, and now it's actually worse because they gave it out for free. I'm usually in favor of increasing the player base and getting new people involved, but the match-making system just isn't good enough to support a large player base or a large addition of new players.
Me (440), 341, 1093 vs. 101, 673, 56
Me (440), Unranked (~5k), Unranked (~2.5k) vs. 163, 79, 134
Me (440), 148, 634 vs. 3x Unranked
Me (440), 351, 380 vs. 2x Unranked, 2500
Me (440), 2x Unranked vs. Unranked, 252, 206
It's not a good sign when getting a bunch of new players means the experience for everyone is significantly worse. I don't understand how there's still no "rank range limit" system in place. There's no reason a ~5k/unranked player should ever be facing top-100s; it's an awful experience for everyone involved.
edit:
Me (476 now), 648, Unranked vs. 176, 207, 114
Seriously, this is virtually unplayable; I haven't had a fair match in days. I quit for 2 months because of this, and now it's actually worse because they gave it out for free. I'm usually in favor of increasing the player base and getting new people involved, but the match-making system just isn't good enough to support a large player base or a large addition of new players.
Opinions reflect all team modes (not 1v1)
I often edit my posts several times after posting
I often edit my posts several times after posting
4 Jul 2021, 23:08 PM
#32
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
Watchmaker = Rosbone btw.
Kind of my own fault though for searching 4v4 after midnight europe time
9 Jul 2021, 17:25 PM
#33
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
11 Jul 2021, 12:34 PM
#34
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
SoE-Luckpanther 
11 Jul 2021, 13:09 PM
#35
Posts: 956
SoE-Luckpanther
Ahhh so he does get the matchmaker working for him then? Saltpanther no more xD
For Italy! We have outfoxed the enemy once more!
12 Jul 2021, 15:25 PM
#36
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
3 minute search time
17 Jul 2021, 18:22 PM
#37
Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
And the unranked team of 2 are two day 1 beginners with less than 10h played
search time was 4 minutes
search time was 4 minutes
17 Jul 2021, 19:03 PM
#38
Posts: 2144 | Subs: 2
Recently, I keep seeing mismatches where a team of 2 or maybe even 3 are given a lot more weight. In a perfect world It makes me hope Relic has made an adjustment to boost premades.
In this particular case, maybe they were still calibrating? So they will get matched high?
In this particular case, maybe they were still calibrating? So they will get matched high?
22 Jul 2021, 16:37 PM
#39
Posts: 956
Casualties were high but we prevailed. Somehow carried the 5.2k. That or the power of Ettelbruck
For Italy! We have outfoxed the enemy once more!
21 Aug 2021, 13:45 PM
#40
Posts: 956
Fastest Alt+F4 in the West.
My MAKO's old (so doesn't show premades properly) but I've only seen Genesis and Chris in a premade together.
For Italy! We have outfoxed the enemy once more!
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
12 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
281 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
402 users are online:
402 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM