Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Well you can choose better unit for comparison.
The Gun is similar to AEC in AT and it has great AI on top of that.
Posts: 682
Another allies OP thread xD. You really complaining about Valentine? Puma easily kills it, snares make it useless. The whole point of that tank is to hit and run and you want to nerf that xD. Let me guess, you lost a game now and got outplayed by a brit with valentine and now are complaining here.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 127
One could even move to stock and make the choice of AEC/Valentine instead of AEC/Bofors.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
And where do we put the Bofors?..
Posts: 127
as stock.
One could even make it doctrinal and it would probably even see more action...
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
>Stock
That sounds somewhat interesting. Would make it a good choice, but would require huge AEC+Valentine nerfs, since you can get both.
>Doctrinal
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Posts: 127
Can not cay much about emplacements since currently they are badly designed and require a redesign...
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
And where do we put the Bofors?..
Posts: 127
Platoon CP can have AEC and valentine tech, which lock out each other and boffor is unlocked with one of those tech unlocked.
Posts: 306
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
putting valentine behind aec ish tech would actually buff it, imagine a valentine hitting the field with a 222
that would be broken beyond repair
Posts: 306
It will obviously come with a neft, such as lower speed, HP, reprofiled gun, etc. And timing can be fine tuned by adjusting cost and research time of the tech. It's timing will be similar to T70.
.
Posts: 1096
I dont know man, but if skilled people like Terror, Olvadi, CN, and even Seeking (he said it in a streaming) and a lot of people who would post it anyways after me right now(Like Stormjager below me), say Valentine its too good, maybe.... they're right you know?
 |
|
|
370 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
