Posts: 1515
Well, if i had the game opened i would had tried. I thought about it. But i wouldn't bother taking a picture and uploading it.
I was amused by the idea of: is it possible for this to happen?
Posts: 5279
Well, technically he didn't. No video showing it. However, I don't think that solo panzergrens can take on pershing. Maybe if you keep moving around and it's missing pretty much every shot.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 960
Just fought a guy who built 3 Pershings in a 51 min game. All 3 died to my double StuGGs. I think the unit is UP at the moment. If there is to be a buff I'd like to see more of an anti-armour focus.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
It's two dedicated AT vehicles (560mp/180f) fighting a generalist 'premium medium' (600mp/230f), that's generally what's supposed to happen.
Posts: 960
No like all 3 times it died easily and it had 2 AT guns around it. I just flanked and chased with StuGGs, they barely ever bounced and it couldn't fight back basically. It also didn't do much on the anti infantry department, only like 1 wipe in a 51 min game and like 6 kills.
Not worth it imo.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
If you're managing to flank with STUGs, chase, and didn't end up facing a horde of REs with Bazookas, it sounds like you just completely out-played your opponent.
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Just fought a guy who built 3 Pershings in a 51 min game. All 3 died to my double StuGGs. I think the unit is UP at the moment. If there is to be a buff I'd like to see more of an anti-armour focus.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Did he use the skillshot with the Pershing tho, it allows you to 3-shot Stugs.
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
I stayed at max range cuz he had bazooka blobs and I didn't wanna lose a StuGG. Guess he didn't feel confident from max range. Not gonna pretend like he managed it perfectly or anything, it was adequate but I kept finding his pershing with double StuGGs and shrek Pgren behind his main line and diving it.
I must say double StuGG is love.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
If he had kept a Pershing alive, he could've added a Jackson and used Combined Arms for that sweet -30% reload. That would have given the Stugs a bad day.
My point being, I don't think the Pershing (doctrine) is lacking in terms of AT.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
I called in a Pershing to fight a sqaud of vet 2 Panzergrenadiers equipped with Panzerschreks. This was a 1v1 fight and the Pershing lost. That's right, a 230 Fuel 640 MP tank lost to a single Wehrmacht AT sqaud.
Posts: 682
That's right
Posts: 658
Posts: 1794
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
I stayed at max range cuz he had bazooka blobs and I didn't wanna lose a StuGG. Guess he didn't feel confident from max range. Not gonna pretend like he managed it perfectly or anything, it was adequate but I kept finding his pershing with double StuGGs and shrek Pgren behind his main line and diving it.
I must say double StuGG is love.
Pershing
We are reducing the AOE damage on the Pershing as a general reduction amongst the majority of heavy tanks.
CP requirement from 9 to 12
Pershing Manpower cost from 600 to 640; brings it in line with other heavy tanks.
AOE damage near from 1/0.4/0.175 to 0.75/0.4/0.175
AOE distance from 0.25/1.5/3.25 to 0/1/3.25
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Care to tell us why it wouldn't have been possible before the patch? You've outplayed your opponent, GG, but who cares?
You're discovering that Stug are good TDs, they've always been - just that last meta was staling for Tiger and no stugs.
 |
|
|
63 | ||
 |
|
|
40 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
