Another option is to make pios cost 180.
Another option is for you to post a replay, where you have lost the game so badly to CEs that you won't let go of wanting to nerf weakest unit in game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Another option is to make pios cost 180.
Posts: 1351
Nah. To prove his point that CE aren't effective after losing 90% of the map is to game the matchup by retreat path blobbing around his minesweeper.
Posts: 1351
Another option is for you to post a replay, where you have lost the game so badly to CEs that you won't let go of weakest unit in game.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It is not the weakest! It is the best in game engineer, largely due to its price.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Nah. To prove his point that CE aren't effective after losing 90% of the map is to game the matchup by retreat path blobbing around his minesweeper.
Posts: 1351
Because the price is the only thing going for it... it doesn't have anything else that would be advantage over other 4.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 208
Nah. To prove his point that CE aren't effective after losing 90% of the map is to game the matchup by retreat path blobbing around his minesweeper.
Posts: 356
Obviously, that’s the best way to delete 4man squads with no defensive bonuses that keep overextending. You were constantly setting yourself up for wipes.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Show me some high level games where CE spam gets stomped if you think it's non-viable.
I played off-faction in a match-up I'm unfamiliar with.
You knew what you were playing against ahead of time, gamed the matchup as hard as you could, and are to afraid to rematch lol.
Posts: 356
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So just so we're clear: CE have stats on par with mainline infantry, excellent utility, cost, and are in the best mine army in the game.
Unfortunately they don't shoot while retreating thus they are an UP worker unit in need of a buff.
Did I get that right?
Posts: 1351
You forgot about the part where all of that falls apart the moment any infantry gets to vet1 or above.
Also, do you need some glasses? Because you've got a link where CE spam was roflstomped in few mins at competitive level - have you not seen that?
Your logic is same as "grens have best infantry stats per model basis and are cheaper, so just spam them and they will beat rifles", but then reality hits.
Posts: 356
You forgot about the part where all of that falls apart the moment any infantry gets to vet1 or above.
Also, do you need some glasses? Because you've got a link where CE spam was roflstomped in few mins at competitive level - have you not seen that?
Your logic is same as "grens have best infantry stats per model basis and are cheaper, so just spam them and they will beat rifles", but then reality hits.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Ah. So I guess partisans ought to be nerfed since kimbo clowns on stormjaeger with them in the match just before that. .
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Ah. So I guess partisans ought to be nerfed since kimbo clowns on stormjaeger with them in the match just before that. There's absolutely no skill difference whatsoever going on you see.
If gren models were like 20 manpower they would be the best infantry. Hell even now they're better than rifles until officers start hitting the field.
Posts: 1351
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Can anybody relate to the fact that because CEs are more easily replaceable, it leads to Soviets being a bit better than other armies and that maybe by raising their price to 200mp the game has a chance of being more balanced. The fact that they can fight is already clearly established
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Can anybody relate to the fact that because CEs are more easily replaceable, it leads to Soviets being a bit better than other armies and that maybe by raising their price to 200mp the game has a chance of being more balanced. The fact that they can fight is already clearly established
Posts: 356
30 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |