Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
So are we going to test this new idea proposed by @Kurobane in this patch?
Cuz it looks promising way to deal with the heavies solution.
Posts: 65
Posts: 658
So are we going to test this new idea proposed by @Kurobane in this patch?
Cuz it looks promising way to deal with the heavies solution.
Posts: 187
Reminder that mod team = modding team and it's not equal to moderation team on coh2.org.
So i don't know what to tell u
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
After testing the new Tiger---> I think the AOE and veterancy nerfs are fine, but I don't know why the Tank Commander ability was removed on top of nerfing AOE + veterancy. The change is very very weird and counter-intuitive. It just makes no sense at all that you can upgrade the KT with it but not the Tiger. Meanwhile you can also upgrade the P4 with the tank commander? 90% of the player base will not get why this was done. This change needs to be deleted IMO. Tiger is fine after AOE+veterancy nerfs, no need for this awkward change.
Posts: 187
After testing the new Tiger---> I think the AOE and veterancy nerfs are fine, but I don't know why the Tank Commander ability was removed on top of nerfing AOE + veterancy. The change is very very weird and counter-intuitive. It just makes no sense at all that you can upgrade the KT with it but not the Tiger. Meanwhile you can also upgrade the P4 with the tank commander? 90% of the player base will not get why this was done. This change needs to be deleted IMO. Tiger is fine after AOE+veterancy nerfs, no need for this awkward change.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
After testing the new Tiger---> I think the AOE and veterancy nerfs are fine, but I don't know why the Tank Commander ability was removed on top of nerfing AOE + veterancy. The change is very very weird and counter-intuitive. It just makes no sense at all that you can upgrade the KT with it but not the Tiger. Meanwhile you can also upgrade the P4 with the tank commander? 90% of the player base will not get why this was done. This change needs to be deleted IMO. Tiger is fine after AOE+veterancy nerfs, no need for this awkward change.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
We've had similar arguments when Pershing lost vehicle crew ability.
That turned out to be fine at the end.
It'll be fine for Tiger as well.
OKW one dominated meta so badly, the only situation when you would ever consider different vehicle was if you already had it on field.
It was never supposed to be this answer to all magical wunderwaffe it became.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Pershing never had a disembark crew ability.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 682
We've had similar arguments when Pershing lost vehicle crew ability.
That turned out to be fine at the end.
It'll be fine for Tiger as well.
OKW one dominated meta so badly, the only situation when you would ever consider different vehicle was if you already had it on field.
It was never supposed to be this answer to all magical wunderwaffe it became.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Command tank that has the no commander upgrade. Let's get rid of the commisar model in that squad and nuke the leutnant for the Germans too for consistency.
The commander was an issue when the tiger was dropping models on at guns when they were trying to move. They'd drop the gun and boom. Since it's been pretty nerfed, it's weird that it's still gone. Quad nerfing has never worked.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Irrelevant, it was faction trait that needed to go to make the unit work and not be insane.
Similar case here.
Posts: 3260
After testing the new Tiger---> I think the AOE and veterancy nerfs are fine, but I don't know why the Tank Commander ability was removed on top of nerfing AOE + veterancy. The change is very very weird and counter-intuitive.
Posts: 682
How's that relevant? Is commissar OP, murderfucking every infantry squad around, while providing strong buffs? Is german officer?
You sure?
Con 7th model got already 4 nerfs, 3 consecutive ones in this very preview patch and I don't see anyone REEEE-ing about it.
When so many nerfs are needed to bring back the unit or ability in line, then that's what's needed to be done.
Posts: 3260
It doesn't make a terrible amount of sense when the KT still has it's aoe.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
The KT doesn't have speed.
They removed the tank commander because the artillery strike combined with the Tiger's speed, durability and AoE made it trivally easy to take out anti-tank guns.
I agree, it feels very arbitrary, but the alternative is a combo the balance team judged to be too strong.
Posts: 682
The KT doesn't have speed.
They removed the tank commander because the artillery strike combined with the Tiger's speed, durability and AoE made it trivally easy to take out anti-tank guns.
I agree, it feels very arbitrary, but the alternative is a combo the balance team judged to be too strong.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
90% of the player base will not get why this was done.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Well at least now heavies will be consistent.....ly bad. Except for the KV2, it’ll be nuking everything in 1v1 and won’t be countered by anything except HEAT and KTs.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
 |
|
|
90 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
163 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
