Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Tulips exist, do damage and do light snare. End of story.
Great lets increase the accuracy of the Ele and JT because they have abysmal reload.
Finally this thread has a specific suggestions try to focus on that and not me.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1515
Posts: 5279
They, however, do not perform that role in the same way.
That's just arguing semantics(again).
Its widely accepted by the community for years that tank destroyers regard 60 range TDs, while tank hunter is panther exclusive as its meant to use its superior mobility and durability to engage and win by brawling/outlasting targets, not sniping them from afar.
The only thing that could be argued is that M10 and StuG3 sit somewhere in-between these 2 roles, exchanging range and durability for superior numbers.
Posts: 31
The JP having its range reduce to 50 is also problematic since the units is designed to counter M36/Su-85/FF because OKW do not have a 60 range ATG as other faction do.
The problem is a bit more complicated…Finally introducing a medium TD to all faction would only make sense if all faction had the same tools in other sector also and they do not. For instance they do not all have light tanks.
Posts: 31
Is HHF seriously saying FF is bad rn? Or that standardization will make it bad? I’m confused.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
FF is by far the worst TD. Not sure how people think it's somehow good. Super vulnerable to blitzing P4s or Panthers, super vulnerable against ATGs and handheld AT.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
In which gametype are you talking about? Cause FF is great in team games. Tulips are even more useful cause the stun can setup flanks by your allies
Su85 isn't vulnerable to being blitzed? I'd say its just as vulnerable if not more because of no turret
Posts: 320
Vetted SU85 is faster than Jackson, do I need to say more?
Posts: 5279
Vetted SU85 is faster than Jackson, do I need to say more?
Posts: 1515
And how's its return fire capabilities? It's not the speed alone that makes the Jackson king, it's that even on retreat it's a threat to armour that chases it.
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Vetted SU85 is faster than Jackson, do I need to say more?
Jackson is a king of speed and maneuverability. It's a tank with a position and role brilliantly defined. Glass cannon by definition. It needs no nerfs/buffs. And Jackson can't really escape any ambush.
Posts: 1515
Yeah you do... Ever heard of moving accuracy? Ever heard of a turret? p4s and panthers have blitz, speed alone isnt going to help you, ability to fight back is just as important
And again...what game type? FF is great in team games
He didn't say it needed any buffs, and if your Jackson gets ambushed to begin with then you were being way too aggressive or you made a mistake. It has 60 range for a reason
 |
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
129 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
