What is the REAL problem with Ost T4?

Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2020, 08:42 AMporkloin

In 5 duels with IS2 vs double stugs or panther:

Stugs win 4 out of 5 fights
Panther wins 1 out of 5 fights
In a series of 5 duels with 2 stugs vs kv-1 and panther vs kv-1

Stugs win all 5 fights, KV-1 manages to kill 2 stugs in different duels
Panther wins only 4 fights


In a trial of 2 brumbar vs 5 guards squads, and 3 ostwinds vs 5 guards squads

7 guards models remain from fighting 2 brumbars
6 guards models remain from fighting 3 ostwinds



In short t3 is the most cost effective vehicle tier for OST. It is at a minimum equal which means teching to t4 is a waste of resources and time.

Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2020, 08:46 AMKatitof

Zero micro vaccuum brawls with unrealistic placement and no additional factors that usually are there are indicators of whooping nothing.

Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2020, 08:49 AMporkloin

Okay. Design a test with these additional factors then. I'll be waiting for your results.

Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2020, 09:00 AMKatitof

Its called a playing the game.
You aren't going to get yourself results from this, unless you've got access to developers api on units.

Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2020, 07:06 AMmrgame2

Ost bunker need 1-2 pop cost. Cancer in 4v4

Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2020, 07:51 AMEsxile

But Ostheer isn't facing any stock heavy in the game except for the churchill. Allied heavies are all doctrinal thus when you see them you built your T4 for Panther.

You want to improve Ostheer T4, I say its already fine as it is. It was a problem because too expensive so it has been made cheaper in exchange of seeing panther and brumbar less powerful. That's fine there is no need to give more advantage to it.

Even if the Tiger is nerfed alongside with all other heavies (Pershing included), that will be a major buff to them, allowing the player to field one or two extra unit with it.